Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 6 → 4 of 37
2 categories · RankedTabnine
120Judge labels
6First choices
9Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
9% in AI coding for enterprise buyers
Rank 5 of 48 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 33 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Tabnine →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business4 of 39
2%38 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market5 of 48
2%33 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise2 of 52
9%46 labels
accepted challenger
In ai coding · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Tabnine for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI coding assistants | Developer platform | 2% | 5 of 48 | 0% | 33 | accepted challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Enterprise AI assistants | Data platform | 0% | 84 of 145 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by ChatGPT at 25% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Tabnine held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · AI coding · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 12 → 4 of 43
Enterprise▲+11Since September 2026: 0% → 11%, +11 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
11%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 0 pointsRank 3 → 2 of 49
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI coding | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 12 → 5 of 48 |
| Enterprise AI | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 84 of 145, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Tabnine across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Tabnine across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct22 labels2
Paraphrase17 labels1
Comparative28 labelsNone
Budget-constrained19 labels3
Scale-constrained11 labelsNone
Negative23 labels13not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative120 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 19 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“on-prem / local models such as Tabnine are repeatedly called out as the privacy champion because your code never leaves your infrastructure” Muse Glimmer 30B · AI coding · negative prompt · first choice
“Prefer privacy-first tools like Tabnine (which can run locally/air-gapped and is trained only on permissively licensed code)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · AI coding · negative prompt · first choice
“I'd start with Amazon CodeWhisperer or Tabnine since they're free” MiniMax M2.5 · AI coding · budget prompt · first choice
“Tabnine: Self-hosted, fully air-gapped, zero code retention” Qwen 3.7 Flash · AI coding · negative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Tabnine, over the 119 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Tabnine was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Tabnine, over the 119 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Tabnine was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Tabnine. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 108 of the 119 answers that named Tabnine and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
augmentcode.com53
dev.to38
kilo.ai32
zoer.ai29
jellyfish.co28
resources.rework.com28
tech-insider.org27
sourcegraph.com23
axify.io21
tembo.io21
300 of the 300 domain citations in answers naming Tabnine came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
tabnine.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Tabnine takes 2% of first choices and GitHub Copilot takes 75%.ShowHide
Search and answers
tabnine.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Tabnine takes 2% of first choices and GitHub Copilot takes 75%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “ai coding assistant”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “ai coding assistants”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 2,900 a month (“tabnine”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 62 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 15,577 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 4,474 · 63 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 9,417
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 5 of 48 in AI coding
Segment leader
75%
GitHub Copilot
- First choices
- 6 across its categories
- Named in
- 119 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 108 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on tabnine.com
291
subdomains included
Content
6
counted in the table below
Documentation
160
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 2 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 2 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 2 | undated |
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page tabnine.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Tabnine
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Tabnine; a claim can dispute any of them.
TabNine 1Tabnine Pro 1
Follow Tabnine
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Tabnine is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Tabnine is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- now part of Tricentis
- For
- Individuals, small, medium, and large organizations
- Certifications
- GDPRISO 9001:2015ISO/IEC 27001SOC 2
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting, customers
What Tabnine's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: tabnine.com, trust.tabnine.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Tabnine's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Tabnine, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Tabnine by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Tabnine is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Tabnine, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.