| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise AI assistants | Data platform | 0% | 19 of 145 | 22% | 23 | accepted challenger | |
| AI coding assistants | Developer platform | 0% | 29 of 48 | 25% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by GitHub Copilot at 75% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| AI IT support agents | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 116 of 121 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Freshservice with Freddy AI at 11% | |
| AI security platforms | Security operations | 0% | 213 of 233 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by SentinelOne Singularity at 11% | |
| ML platforms | Data platform | 0% | 58 of 107 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Azure Machine Learning at 21% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best used alongside another tool (like Glean or Copilot) rather than as a standalone company-wide assistant.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Enterprise AI · direct prompt · alternative
“It's worth evaluating alongside ChatGPT when document analysis, writing, or code work is central.” GPT-6 Luna · Enterprise AI · comparative prompt · alternative
“Claude for deep reasoning, massive context windows, and safety-focused regulated industries” Kimi K2 · Enterprise AI · comparative prompt · alternative
“Enterprise versions with data privacy guarantees (e.g., ChatGPT Enterprise, Claude Enterprise)” MiniMax M2.5 · Enterprise AI · negative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Consumer-grade AI platforms like free/public ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude, as they do not meet enterprise AI compliance requirements” Llama 4 Maverick · AI security · negative prompt · hard negative
“Free ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude etc. are not designed for enterprise data handling.” Muse Glimmer 30B · AI IT agents · negative prompt · hard negative
“Same issues with data being used for training” MiniMax M2.5 · Enterprise AI · negative prompt · hard negative
“all four dominant enterprise AI assistants ... have potential risks and concerns associated with them. Therefore, it is recommended to be cautious” Llama 4 Maverick · Enterprise AI · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 105 of the 109 answers that named Claude and are not a share of its labels.
245 of the 245 domain citations in answers naming Claude came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glossary or explainer | 821 | undated | |||
| Blog | 376 | undated | |||
| Case study | 283 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 13 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 6 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 4 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 3 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 3 | undated | |||
| News or press | 2 | undated |
Every page claude.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Claude's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: claude.com, claude.com/pricing, claude.com/contact-sales/security, claude.com/product/tag, claude.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Claude's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Claude, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Claude by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: