IT AI Index
Index Vendors › Cursor · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Cursor

161Judge labels
6First choices
42Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
9% in AI coding for small business buyers
Rank 3 of 46 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
2 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 19% of its 52 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In ai coding · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Cursor for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
AI coding assistantsDeveloper platform4%3 of 4619%52accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Cursor yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Cursor across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.510001
GPT-5.4 mini02114
Gemini 3.5 Flash13026
Perplexity Sonar03014
Grok 4.1 Fast13015
Mistral Small12104
DeepSeek V4 Flash12115
Llama 4 Maverick11103
Qwen 3.7 Flash02226
Kimi K202114
GLM 4.7 FlashX12115
MiniMax M2.504105

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct31 labels3
Paraphrase23 labels1
Comparative35 labels12not counted in share
Budget-constrained26 labelsNone
Scale-constrained19 labels2
Negative27 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative161 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 18 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you want a state-of-the-art, everyday editor that manages your entire workspace effortlessly: Go with Cursor.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · AI coding · comparative prompt · first choice
“likely to be GitHub Copilot Business or Cursor Business, depending on the specific needs and budget” Llama 4 Maverick · AI coding · direct prompt · first choice
“the best AI coding assistants are GitHub Copilot Business and Cursor Business” Mistral Small · AI coding · direct prompt · first choice
“Cursor fits editor-first work and strong multi-file edits” Claude Haiku 4.5 · AI coding · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“avoid standard free-tier or public instances of major AI coding assistants (such as GitHub Copilot standard, Cursor, or Windsurf)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · AI coding · negative prompt · hard negative
“Over 30 vulnerabilities reported; 100% of tested AI IDEs were vulnerable to chained prompt injection and auto-approved tool calls” GLM 4.7 FlashX · AI coding · negative prompt · hard negative
“Documented security incidents involving insufficient boundaries and autonomous actions” Kimi K2 · AI coding · negative prompt · hard negative
“Cursor says turning off Privacy Mode allows it to use and store codebase data, prompts, editor actions, snippets, and other code data to improve AI features and train models.” GPT-5.4 mini · AI coding · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Cursor, over the 158 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Cursor was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Tabnine93 of 1589Not in the top three
Amazon Q Developer76 of 1586Not in the top three
Claude Code66 of 1580Not in the top three
Gemini Code Assist20 of 1581Not in the top three
Sourcegraph Cody19 of 1580Not in the top three
Aider17 of 1581Not in the top three
Augment Code16 of 1581Not in the top three
Continue15 of 1581Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Cursor. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 134 of the 158 answers that named Cursor and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

axify.io56
augmentcode.com52
dev.to41
learn.g2.com38
memeburn.com30
tech-insider.org30
layer3labs.io29
getdx.com23
zapier.com23
resources.rework.com21

343 of the 343 domain citations in answers naming Cursor came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Cursor

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Cursor; a claim can dispute any of them.
Cursor Teams 3Cursor AI 2Cursor Business 2Cursor (Enterprise Plan) 1Cursor (Free Tier) 1Cursor (Hobby) 1Cursor (Teams / Enterprise) 1Cursor Business/Enterprise 1Cursor for Teams/Enterprise 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Cursor's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Cursor, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at cursor.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.