AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Google Gemini for Workspace · October 2026 Edition
Google Cloud · 1 category · Ranked

Google Gemini for Workspace

25Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Enterprise AI for enterprise buyers
Rank 20 of 145 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 7 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In enterprise ai · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Google Gemini for Workspace for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Enterprise AI assistantsData platform0%20 of 1450%7under 10 labels · led by ChatGPT at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Google Gemini for Workspace yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Google Gemini for Workspace across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.502002
GPT-6 Luna01001
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative10 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained6 labels1
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative25 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Mostly Google Workspace? Start with Gemini for Workspace; evaluate Gemini Enterprise if you need broader cross-system search” GPT-6 Luna · Enterprise AI · comparative prompt · alternative
“Choose Google Gemini if you already use Google Workspace, as the bundled pricing offers better value.” Kimi K2 · Enterprise AI · budget prompt · alternative
“If you're using Google Workspace: Gemini Business at $20/user/month is your best bet” MiniMax M2.5 · Enterprise AI · budget prompt · alternative
“Best for organizations already using Google Workspace” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Enterprise AI · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Google Gemini for Workspace, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Google Gemini for Workspace was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
ChatGPT21 of 256Not among the top eight
Microsoft 365 Copilot17 of 2511Not among the top eight
Claude11 of 250Not among the top eight
Glean9 of 251Not among the top eight
Amazon Q7 of 253Not among the top eight
Microsoft Copilot6 of 252Not among the top eight
Moveworks4 of 250Not among the top eight
Salesforce Agentforce3 of 250Not among the top eight
Anthropic Claude Enterprise2 of 250Not among the top eight
Claude for Enterprise2 of 250Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Google Gemini for Workspace. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 25 of the 25 answers that named Google Gemini for Workspace and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

coworker.ai14
slite.com11
resources.rework.com10
perceptis.ai9
xpander.ai9
intuitionlabs.ai8
monday.com8
glean.com7
moveworks.com7
meta-intelligence.tech6

Eighty-nine of the eighty-nine domain citations in answers naming Google Gemini for Workspace came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Google Gemini for Workspace stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Searches for its name, Google
170 a month (“google gemini for workspace”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
183 a month
Its own site
It sits on Google Cloud's site (google.com), so there are no site figures for it alone

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 20 of 145 in Enterprise AI
Segment leader
25%
ChatGPT
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
25 answers
Its own site cited
in 25 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Google Gemini for Workspace

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Google Gemini for Workspace; a claim can dispute any of them.
Google Gemini for Workspace / Gemini Enterprise 1

Follow Google Gemini for Workspace

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Google Cloud is the company behind Google Gemini for Workspace.
ShowHide
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Google Gemini for Workspace's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Google Gemini for Workspace, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Google Gemini for Workspace by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Google Gemini for Workspace is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Google Gemini for Workspace, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at google.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.