Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 23 of 57, unchanged
Atlassian · 2 categories · Named, not rankedAtlassian Statuspage
5Judge labels
0First choices
2Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Atlassian Statuspage was named 2 times in Incidents and 1 other category, where incident.io led with 32%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market24 of 65
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In incidents · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Atlassian Statuspage for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Incident management and on-call | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 24 of 65 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by incident.io at 32% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Website and synthetic monitoring | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 28 of 67 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by UptimeRobot at 24% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Atlassian Statuspage held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Incidents · by segment
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Incidents | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 24 of 65, unchanged |
| Uptime monitoring | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 28 of 67, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Atlassian Statuspage across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Atlassian Statuspage across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“The Best for Client Communication: Atlassian Statuspage” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Uptime monitoring · direct prompt · alternative
“For Customer Trust (External): Go with Statuspage” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Incidents · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Atlassian Statuspage, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Atlassian Statuspage was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Atlassian Statuspage, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Atlassian Statuspage was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Atlassian Statuspage. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 5 answers that named Atlassian Statuspage and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
docs.datadoghq.com2
support.atlassian.comYour site2
atlassian.comYour site1
betterstack.com1
catchpoint.com1
datadoghq.com1
docs.newrelic.com1
docs.thousandeyes.com1
uptime.com1
uptimerobot.com1
Nine of the twelve domain citations in answers naming Atlassian Statuspage came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
atlassian.com ranks 4 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Atlassian Statuspage takes 0% of first choices and incident.io takes 32%.ShowHide
Search and answers
atlassian.com ranks 4 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Atlassian Statuspage takes 0% of first choices and incident.io takes 32%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “incident management platform”
5
Position for “incident management platforms”
4
- Its company's site
- atlassian.com shared with Atlassian's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 4,724,388 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 192,288 · 33,627 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 137,840
- Paid Google search
- 33 searches its ads show for, about 356 clicks and $5,906 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 24 of 65 in incidents
Segment leader
32%
incident.io
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 5 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 3 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Follow Atlassian Statuspage
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Atlassian is the company behind Atlassian Statuspage.ShowHide
The company
Atlassian is the company behind Atlassian Statuspage.
ShowHideOn record
Company recordsIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Real-Time Incident Communication with Statuspage
- For
- Support & IT teams; DEVOPS & IT TEAMS; INCIDENT RESPONSE TEAMS; MARKETING & SALES TEAMS
- Price stated
- Free; $29/month; $99/month; $399/month; $1,499/month; $79/month; $249/month; $599/month; Starting at $300/month atlassian.com/software/statuspage
- Starting price
- 29/month atlassian.com/software/statuspage
- Free plan or trial
- Free atlassian.com/software/statuspage
- Integrations claimed
- 150 atlassian.com/software/statuspage
- Customers named
- DigitalOceanDropbox
- Not stated on the pages read
- Certifications, hosting
What Atlassian Statuspage's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: atlassian.com/software/statuspage, atlassian.com/software/statuspage/pricing, atlassian.com/software/statuspage/features, atlassian.com/software/statuspage/public-pages, atlassian.com/software/statuspage/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Atlassian Statuspage's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Atlassian Statuspage, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Atlassian Statuspage by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Atlassian Statuspage is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Atlassian Statuspage, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.