IT AI Index
Index Vendors › Atlassian Bamboo · September 2026 Edition
Atlassian · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Atlassian Bamboo

17Judge labels
0First choices
13Negative labels
9 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Atlassian Bamboo was named 6 times in CI/CD, where GitHub Actions led with 65%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In ci/cd · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Atlassian Bamboo for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
CI/CD platformsDeveloper platform0%45 of 4583%6under 10 labels · led by GitHub Actions at 65%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Atlassian Bamboo yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Atlassian Bamboo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500011
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00011
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00011
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200011
GLM 4.7 FlashX00112
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative4 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative11 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“EOL August 21, 2026. Atlassian is sunsetting it in favor of Bitbucket Pipelines.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · CI/CD · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid (unless locked into Atlassian Data Center).” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CI/CD · negative prompt · hard negative
“Atlassian Bamboo — AVOID for new projects” Kimi K2 · CI/CD · negative prompt · hard negative
“Why to avoid: End of Life (EOL).” GLM 4.7 FlashX · CI/CD · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Atlassian Bamboo, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Atlassian Bamboo was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
GitLab CI/CD16 of 175Not in the top three
Jenkins16 of 170Not in the top three
GitHub Actions15 of 175Not in the top three
CircleCI12 of 170Not in the top three
JetBrains TeamCity12 of 170Not in the top three
Azure DevOps9 of 170Not in the top three
Travis CI8 of 170Not in the top three
Harness6 of 170Not in the top three
Buildkite5 of 171Not in the top three
AWS CodePipeline4 of 170Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Atlassian Bamboo. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 17 answers that named Atlassian Bamboo and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

blog.jetbrains.com9
octopus.com8
circleci.com7
checkthat.ai4
in-com.com4
toolradar.com4
cloudbees.com3
group-ib.com3
harness.io3
owasp.org3

Forty-eight of the forty-eight domain citations in answers naming Atlassian Bamboo came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Atlassian Bamboo

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Atlassian Bamboo; a claim can dispute any of them.
Bamboo 2Atlassian Bamboo (On-Premises / Server) 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Atlassian Bamboo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Atlassian Bamboo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at atlassian.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack