Every category where a model named Catchpoint for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Website and synthetic monitoring	IT operations and endpoint	2%	15 of 67	50%	8	under 10 labels · led by UptimeRobot at 24%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Catchpoint yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Catchpoint across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	1	0	0	1
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labelsNone

Paraphrase16 labels3

Comparative6 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative31 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I recommend starting with Catchpoint if you sell to a global audience and care deeply about page load times” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Uptime monitoring · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Catchpoint excels in proactive monitoring of application performance, availability, and user experience” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Uptime monitoring · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“consider Catchpoint as an enterprise-oriented comparison” GPT-6 Luna · Uptime monitoring · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“What I'd Avoid for a Typical Mid-Sized B2B ... Excellent but enterprise-focused; median contract ~$51K/year. Overkill” Kimi K2 · Uptime monitoring · paraphrase prompt · hard negative

“More expensive and complex; best for large enterprises... optional add‑ons rather than core” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Uptime monitoring · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

“This is enterprise territory — probably more than a mid-sized B2B company needs.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Uptime monitoring · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

“It bypasses the complexity of enterprise tools like Dynatrace or Catchpoint.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Uptime monitoring · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Catchpoint, over the 31 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Catchpoint was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Datadog Synthetic Monitoring24 of 317Not among the top eight

Dynatrace23 of 318Not among the top eight

New Relic Synthetics19 of 311Not among the top eight

Site24x79 of 312Not among the top eight

Cisco ThousandEyes9 of 310Not among the top eight

Pingdom7 of 311Not among the top eight

Checkly6 of 312Not among the top eight

ThousandEyes5 of 310Not among the top eight

Better Stack4 of 311Not among the top eight

AppDynamics4 of 310Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Catchpoint. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 27 of the 31 answers that named Catchpoint and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

motadata.com11

newrelic.com11

contentsquare.com10

catchpoint.comYour site9

zendikt.com9

gartner.com7

kentik.com7

comparitech.com6

cubeapm.com6

dotcom-monitor.com6

Seventy-three of the eighty-two domain citations in answers naming Catchpoint came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

motadata.com/blog/top-digital-experience-monitoring-tools10

contentsquare.com/guides/digital-experience-monitoring/tools9

zendikt.com/top-10-synthetic-monitoring-software9

newrelic.com/blog/observability/digital-experience-monitoring-tools7

atatus.com/blog/synthetic-monitoring-tools5

newrelic.com/blog/dem/synthetic-monitoring-tools5

openobserve.ai/blog/best-synthetic-monitoring-tools5

comparitech.com/net-admin/digital-experience-monitoring-solutions4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

catchpoint.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Catchpoint takes 2% of first choices and UptimeRobot takes 24%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “uptime monitoring tool”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “website monitoring tools”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 1,000 a month (“catchpoint”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 25 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 44,364 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 4,761 · 316 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 3,632
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 15 of 67 in uptime monitoring

Segment leader

24%

UptimeRobot

First choices: 3 across its categories
Named in: 31 answers
Its own site cited: in 27 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on catchpoint.com

1,536

subdomains included

Content

1,102

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

2 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	765	2	2026-08-01	CDN, APM
News or press	101	undated		DEX
Webinar or virtual event	71	0	2024-08-22	CDN
Comparison	45	1	2026-07-22	APM, SD-WAN
Case study	41	1	2026-08-05
Glossary or explainer	30	0	2026-05-12	APM
Podcast or video	24	0	2022-04-11
Conference or event	13	0	2025-11-17
Report or ebook	10	0	2021-11-08	CDN
Template or tool	2	undated		CDN

Most recent

2026-08-05Box case study
2026-08-01Apdex blog
2026-08-01Tcp flags blog
2026-07-22Catchpoint vs thousandeyes comparison
2026-07-01Cloudinary case study
2026-06-30Fastly case study

Events in person

Last twelve months

November 4, 2025Peak Performance Summit: BangaloreMG Road, Bengalaru · attended
October 21, 2025Catchpoint on the Road: ChicagoTopgolf Schaumburg · hosted

As the event pages on catchpoint.com state them, read October 5, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page catchpoint.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name CDN (17); 0 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Catchpoint

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Catchpoint is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Internet Performance Monitoring (IPM)
catchpoint.com
For: IT and digital teams
catchpoint.com
Price stated: Pricing catchpoint.com/platform
Free plan or trial: free trial catchpoint.com/legal/trust
Integrations claimed: 100 catchpoint.com/partners
Certifications: SOC 2 Type 2 CertificationISO 27001 CertificationSOC 2 compliant
Customers named: GoogleLinkedInL'OréalHoneywellAkamaiHostingerPricelineEquinix
Not stated on the pages read: Starting price, hosting

What Catchpoint's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: catchpoint.com, catchpoint.com/legal/trust, catchpoint.com/platform, catchpoint.com/customers, catchpoint.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Catchpoint's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Catchpoint, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Catchpoint by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Catchpoint is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Catchpoint, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.