IT AI Index

Index › Products › DomDog · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

DomDog

15Judge labels

0First choices

2Negative labels

8 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

6 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. DomDog was named 6 times in Client-side protection, where cside led with 13%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business35 of 144

under the label threshold

Mid-market30 of 120

under the label threshold

Enterprise25 of 98

under the label threshold

In client-side protection · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named DomDog for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Client-side protection	Security operations	0%	30 of 120	17%	6	under 10 labels · led by cside at 13%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for DomDog yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated DomDog across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	0	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative7 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative3 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Simple, affordable plan for small sites | Fewer advanced features” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Client-side protection · budget prompt · alternative

“Remote scanning of payment pages (no client-side code)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Client-side protection · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Feroot, Reflectiz and DomDog” Muse Glimmer 30B · Client-side protection · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Tools to Avoid on a Tight Budget - Reflectiz, Feroot, DomDog, Jscrambler” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Client-side protection · budget prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as DomDog, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and DomDog was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Jscrambler Webpage Integrity12 of 150Not among the top eight

cside11 of 153Not among the top eight

Reflectiz11 of 150Not among the top eight

Feroot PaymentGuard10 of 150Not among the top eight

Imperva Client-Side Protection8 of 151Not among the top eight

Source Defense7 of 150Not among the top eight

Akamai Page Integrity Manager3 of 150Not among the top eight

Cloudflare Client-Side Security3 of 150Not among the top eight

HUMAN Security3 of 150Not among the top eight

otto-js2 of 151Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named DomDog. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 15 answers that named DomDog and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cside.com14

g2.com11

sourceforge.net11

us.fitgap.com11

startupstash.com10

f6s.com9

topbusinesssoftware.com9

slashdot.org8

imperva.com7

radware.com7

Ninety-seven of the ninety-seven domain citations in answers naming DomDog came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cside.com/blog/top-client-side-security-tools-full-guide14

g2.com/categories/client-side-protection10

startupstash.com/top-client-side-protection-tools10

f6s.com/software/category/client-side-protection8

sourceforge.net/software/client-side-protection/for-mid-size-business8

imperva.com/products/client-side-protection-csp7

cside.com/blog/solution-comparison-pci-dss-6-4-3-and-11-6-16

radware.com/cyberpedia/application-security/best-application-security-solutions6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

domdog.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, DomDog takes 0% of first choices and cside takes 13%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “client-side protection tool”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “client-side protection tools”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 40 a month (“domdog”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 24 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 19 · 1 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 78
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 30 of 120 in client-side protection

Segment leader

13%

cside

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 15 answers
Its own site cited: in 15 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on domdog.io

subdomains included

Content

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	2025-11 to 2026-10	Latest	Categories named
Blog	32	undated

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page domdog.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow DomDog

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

DomDog is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Page Security & Privacy Platform
domdog.io
For: MSPs, MSSPs, Payment Providers, and PaaS providers
domdog.io
Price stated: Simple, Transparent Pricing domdog.io/pricing
Starting price: 999/year domdog.io/pricing
Free plan or trial: Try Free For 30 Days; No card required domdog.io
Not stated on the pages read: Integrations, certifications, hosting, customers

What DomDog's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: domdog.io, domdog.io/pricing. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when DomDog's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as DomDog, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for DomDog by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where DomDog is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name DomDog, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.