| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Managed DNS | Network and edge | 2% | 4 of 78 | 0% | 21 | accepted challenger | |
| DNS filtering | Network and edge | 0% | 25 of 94 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by DNSFilter at 59% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Cloudflare or Akamai are excellent choices because they offer enterprise-grade reliability” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Managed DNS · direct prompt · first choice
“Enterprise providers (Infoblox, UltraDNS, Akamai, Dyn) excel in large‑scale, security‑heavy, and highly regulated environments” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Managed DNS · comparative prompt · alternative
“Another strong option, especially for companies needing a large global footprint and high availability.” Mistral Small · Managed DNS · direct prompt · alternative
“Enterprises may prefer Akamai or Oracle Dyn for advanced support and global infrastructure.” MiniMax M2.5 · Managed DNS · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 58 of the 66 answers that named Akamai Edge DNS and are not a share of its labels.
200 of the 200 domain citations in answers naming Akamai Edge DNS came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Akamai Edge DNS's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: techdocs.akamai.com/edge-dns/changelog, techdocs.akamai.com/edge-dns/reference/304, techdocs.akamai.com/edge-dns/reference/400, techdocs.akamai.com/edge-dns/reference/401, techdocs.akamai.com/edge-dns/reference/403. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Akamai Edge DNS's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Akamai Edge DNS, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Akamai Edge DNS by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: