Akamai Enterprise Threat Protector
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DNS filtering | Network and edge | 0% | 20 of 94 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by DNSFilter at 59% |
Movement
By model
How each model treated Akamai Enterprise Threat Protector across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Mid-market organizations should prioritize Cloudflare Gateway, Akamai Enterprise Threat Protector, or Prisma Access DNS Security” Claude Haiku 4.5 · DNS filtering · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Akamai Enterprise Threat Protector, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Akamai Enterprise Threat Protector was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 19 of the 20 answers that named Akamai Enterprise Threat Protector and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
103 of the 103 domain citations in answers naming Akamai Enterprise Threat Protector came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where Akamai Enterprise Threat Protector stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 10 a month (“akamai enterprise threat protector”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Its own site
- It sits on Akamai's site (akamai.com), so there are no site figures for it alone
In answers
This edition- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 20 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 19 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Akamai Enterprise Threat Protector
Follow Akamai Enterprise Threat Protector
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Akamai is the company behind Akamai Enterprise Threat Protector.ShowHide
The company
On record
Company recordsIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Returns all available Akamai built-in lists.
- Customers named
- SideCopyLazarus Group
- Not stated on the pages read
- Who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Akamai Enterprise Threat Protector's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: techdocs.akamai.com/etp-config/reference/get-akamai-lists, techdocs.akamai.com/etp-reporting/reference/get-threat-intel, techdocs.akamai.com/etp-reporting/reference/get-threat-events, techdocs.akamai.com/etp-reporting/reference/get-threat-metadata, techdocs.akamai.com/etp-reporting/reference/post-threat-event-details. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Akamai Enterprise Threat Protector's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Akamai Enterprise Threat Protector, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Akamai Enterprise Threat Protector by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Akamai Enterprise Threat Protector is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Akamai Enterprise Threat Protector, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.