1 category · RankedInfoblox Threat Defense
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DNS filtering | Network and edge | 0% | 16 of 94 | 14% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by DNSFilter at 59% |
Movement
By model
How each model treated Infoblox Threat Defense across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best for: Enterprises already heavily invested in DDI (DNS, DHCP, IPAM) infrastructure” DeepSeek V4 Flash · DNS filtering · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for: Enterprises already using Infoblox DDI infrastructure” Kimi K2 · DNS filtering · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Powerful but expensive and complex — generally overkill for mid-market” DeepSeek V4 Flash · DNS filtering · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Infoblox Threat Defense, over the 36 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Infoblox Threat Defense was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 34 of the 36 answers that named Infoblox Threat Defense and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
154 of the 154 domain citations in answers naming Infoblox Threat Defense came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
infoblox.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Infoblox Threat Defense takes 0% of first choices and DNSFilter takes 59%.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 90 a month (“infoblox threat defense”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 1 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 32,766 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 3,833 · 429 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 6,909
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This edition- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 36 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 34 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHide| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,864 | 40 | 2026-10-01 | SIEM, SOAR | |
| News or press | 272 | 5 | 2026-08-06 | ASM | |
| Podcast or video | 204 | 6 | 2026-08-24 | SOAR, DDI and IPAM | |
| Report or ebook | 184 | 5 | 2026-08-13 | XDR, ASM | |
| Case study | 140 | 0 | 2026-05-11 | SIEM | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 123 | 15 | 2026-09-28 | XDR, ASM | |
| Glossary or explainer | 93 | 0 | 2024-11-14 | DLP, SASE | |
| Conference or event | 27 | 0 | 2026-03-19 | ||
| Comparison | 8 | 0 | 2026-06-18 | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-10-01Celebrating the partners driving customer impact and growth across the americas blog
- 2026-09-28Ams protecting your brand when seasonal attacks scale webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-28Apj protecting your brand when seasonal attacks scale webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-28Emea protecting your brand when seasonal attacks scale webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-23Preempt attack surface exploitation blog
- 2026-09-22Infoblox on infoblox how dns forward proxy dfp gives us unified security and visibility across hybrid networks blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page infoblox.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name SIEM (10); 0 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.
Names read as Infoblox Threat Defense
Follow Infoblox Threat Defense
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Infoblox Threat Defense is its own company.ShowHide
The company
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Quickly deploy hybrid DNS-layer security everywhere
- For
- enterprise
- Price stated
- Infoblox token-based licensing infoblox.com/pricing
- Customers named
- UC DavisCity and County of San FranciscoStupp Bros.
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Infoblox Threat Defense's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: infoblox.com, infoblox.com/pricing, trust.infoblox.com, infoblox.com/platform, infoblox.com/topic/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Infoblox Threat Defense's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Infoblox Threat Defense, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Infoblox Threat Defense by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Infoblox Threat Defense is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Infoblox Threat Defense, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.