OT and IoT security for enterprise buyers
Asked as “OT security platform”, and as “industrial and IoT device security tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 54 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each. Added to the September 2026 Edition; its answers are read by the distilled judge (ai-indexes-judge-qwen3-14b-run3), not the claude-opus-5 judge of the earlier categories: how the two compare.
Standing · first-choice share
35%
Contested · Nozomi Networks Guardian 22%
35Claroty xDome22Nozomi Networks Guardian15Microsoft Defender for IoT28others
35% of first choices, contested.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the two products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02M03
04
05
06
07
08
09Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Claroty xDome35%
Claroty xDome35%02Nozomi Networks Guardian22%
Nozomi Networks Guardian22%03Microsoft Defender for IoT15%
04Dragos Platform9%
Dragos Platform9%05Armis Centrix6%
Armis Centrix6%06Fortinet OT Security Platform4%
Fortinet OT Security Platform4%07Forescout Vistaro Platform2%
Forescout Vistaro Platform2%08Tenable OT Security0%
Tenable OT Security0%09Palo Alto Networks0%
Palo Alto Networks0%What they warned about
Three of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Armis Centrix18%
8 of 44 labels negative · 8 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“Less Predictable Options (Avoid for your use case)” GLM 4.7 FlashX, budget prompt
Microsoft Defender for IoT
12%
6 of 48 labels negative · 6 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“**Avoid for a new deployment.** If you still use it, treat migration as a priority.” GPT-6 Luna, negative prompt
Dragos Platform11%
6 of 53 labels negative · 5 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“Less Predictable Options (Avoid for your use case)” GLM 4.7 FlashX, budget prompt
Claroty xDome8%
5 of 63 labels negative · 4 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“Less Predictable Options (Avoid for your use case)” GLM 4.7 FlashX, budget prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the twelve in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
79 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1179 links across 293 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.
41 answers · 41 citations · 12 models
vendor site · NetWitness39 answers · 44 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Elisity30 answers · 32 citations · 11 models
29 answers · 29 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Fortinet24 answers · 34 citations · 12 models
24 answers · 24 citations · 9 models
21 answers · 31 citations · 8 models
vendor site · FitGap21 answers · 23 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G220 answers · 35 citations · 10 models
20 answers · 23 citations · 9 models
19 answers · 19 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Nozomi Networks16 answers · 18 citations · 7 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
41 answers · 12 models
37 answers · 12 models
30 answers · 11 models
29 answers · 10 models
24 answers · 9 models
19 answers · 10 models
16 answers · 11 models
15 answers · 7 models
15 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best ot security platform”, “ot and iot security platforms”, “ot security platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claroty xDome claroty.com | 35% | 159 | 170 | 3 | 4,901 | 14 | ||
| Nozomi Networks Guardian nozominetworks.com | 22% | 133 | 20 | 0 | 3,643 | 25 | ||
| Microsoft parent site Microsoft Defender for IoT 15% | 15% | 133 | 2,240,000 | 403,136 | ||||
| Dragos Platform dragos.com | 9% | 128 | 70 | 2 | 9,960 | 0 | ||
| Armis Centrix armis.com | 6% | 104 | 170 | 2 | 197,925 | $2,192 | 12 | |
| Fortinet parent site Fortinet OT Security Platform 4% | 4% | 66 | 49,500 | 2,339 | ||||
| Forescout eyeInspect forescout.com Forescout Vistaro Platform 2%, Forescout eyeInspect 0% | 2% | 53 | 5,690 | 41 | 2 | |||
| Cisco parent site Cisco Cyber Vision 2% | 2% | 17 | 165,000 | 48,352 | ||||
| Check Point parent site Check Point Quantum IoT Protect 2% | 2% | 3 | 14,800 | 4,487 | ||||
| CrowdStrike crowdstrike.com | 2% | 337 | 74,000 | 5,130 | 715,209 | $13,967 | 119 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 21 sites; 6 of them are among the sites the models cited here (elisity.com, fortinet.com, g2.com, gartner.com, netwitness.com, networkintelligence.ai). The first result for “best ot security platform” is fortinet.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best OT security platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which industrial and IoT device security tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade OT and IoT security platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best OT security platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a OT security platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which OT and IoT security platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Nozomi Networks GuardianNozomi Networks GuardianHeldNozomi Networks GuardianCrowdStrikeno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoTTwo alternatives
Armis Centrix, Forescout Vistaro PlatformFive alternatives
Armis Centrix, Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Forescout Vistaro Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoTThree alternatives
Fortinet OT Security Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Seceon OTMGPT-5.4 miniFortinet OT Security PlatformClaroty xDomeChangedNozomi Networks Guardianagainst: Rockwell/partnered industrial platformsCisco Cyber Visionno first choiceagainst: ABB, Johnson Controls, Mitsubishi Electric, Rockwell Automation, SUBNET Solutions
Three alternatives
Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Nozomi Networks GuardianTwo alternatives
Armis Centrix, Tenable OT ExposureFour alternatives
Dragos Platform, Fortinet OT Security Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Tenable One OT ExposureThree alternatives
Dragos Platform, Fortinet OT Security Platform, Nozomi Networks GuardianGemini 3.5 FlashDragos PlatformClaroty xDome, Nozomi Networks GuardianChangedClaroty xDomeDragos Platform, Nozomi Networks GuardianClaroty xDomeagainst: Armis Centrix, Fortinet OT Security Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, NetRise, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Palo Alto Networks, Qualys, Rapid7, ServiceNow, Tenable OT Security, runZero
Six alternatives
Armis Centrix, Claroty xDome, Fortinet OT Security Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Palo Alto NetworksTwo alternatives
Armis Centrix, Microsoft Defender for IoTFour alternatives
Armis Centrix, Dragos Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks GuardianFour alternatives
Armis Centrix, Claroty xDome, Tenable One, Thinfinity WorkspaceFour alternatives
Cisco Cyber Vision, Dragos Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks GuardianPerplexity SonarClaroty xDomeClaroty xDomeHeldno first choiceFortinet OT Security Platformno first choiceagainst: Armis Centrix, CrowdStrike, Forcepoint, Forescout Vistaro Platform, Fortinet OT Security Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Ordr, Palo Alto Networks IoT Security
One alternative
Dragos PlatformTwo alternatives
Check Point Quantum IoT Protect, Dragos PlatformTwo alternatives
Dragos Platform, Nozomi Networks GuardianGrok 4.1 FastClaroty xDomeNozomi Networks GuardianChangedClaroty xDomeMicrosoft Defender for IoTagainst: Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Nozomi Networks Guardianno first choiceagainst: Armis Centrix, Forcepoint, Palo Alto Networks IoT/OT Security
Three alternatives
Dragos Platform, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Palo Alto NetworksFour alternatives
Armis Centrix, Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoTFive alternatives
Armis Centrix, Dragos Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Tenable OT SecurityThree alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon, Forescout Vistaro Platform, Tenable OT SecurityMistral SmallClaroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Nozomi Networks GuardianCheck Point Quantum IoT ProtectChangedDragos PlatformClaroty xDome, Nozomi Networks Guardianno first choicenothing named
One alternative
AWS IoT Device DefenderTen alternatives
AWS IoT Device Defender, Armis Centrix, Claroty xDome, Finite State, Fortinet OT Security Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Palo Alto Networks IoT Security, SecuriThings, Tenable OT SecurityDeepSeek V4 FlashClaroty xDome, Dragos PlatformArmis CentrixChangedDragos Platformagainst: Forescout Vistaro PlatformMicrosoft Defender for IoTagainst: Dragos Platformno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Defender for IoTagainst: Armis Centrix, Check Point, Cisco, Forcepoint, Palo Alto Networks IoT/OT Security, Symantec Identity Governance and Administration, Tenable OT Security
One alternative
Nozomi Networks GuardianOne alternative
Claroty xDomeEight alternatives
Armis Centrix, Claroty xDome, Fortinet OT Security Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Ordr, Palo Alto Networks IoT/OT Security, Tenable OT SecurityTwo alternatives
Claroty xDome, Nozomi Networks GuardianLlama 4 MaverickClaroty xDomeno first choiceChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Darktrace, ForcepointQwen 3.7 FlashNozomi Networks GuardianNozomi Networks GuardianHeldClaroty xDome, Nozomi Networks GuardianMicrosoft Defender for IoTagainst: Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Nozomino first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Claroty xDome, FireEye, IBM Verify, Tenable OT SecurityTwo alternatives
Claroty xDome, Tenable OT SecurityThree alternatives
Armis Centrix, Darktrace, Tenable OT SecurityTwo alternatives
CrowdStrike, Tenable Vulnerability ManagementKimi K2Claroty xDome, Nozomi Networks GuardianClaroty xDomeChangedClaroty xDomeMicrosoft Defender for IoTagainst: Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Nozomi Networks GuardianArmis Centrix, Claroty xDomeagainst: Armis Centrix, Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks Guardian
Three alternatives
Dragos Platform, Fortinet OT Security Platform, Palo Alto NetworksThree alternatives
Dragos Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks GuardianFive alternatives
Armis Centrix, Dragos Platform, Forescout Vistaro Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks GuardianTwo alternatives
Fortinet OT Security Platform, Tenable OT SecurityTwo alternatives
Dragos Platform, Nozomi Networks GuardianGLM 4.7 FlashXClaroty xDome, Nozomi Networks GuardianMicrosoft Defender for IoTChangedDragos PlatformMicrosoft Defender for IoTagainst: Armis Centrix, Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Tenable OT Securityno first choiceagainst: Cisco IoT Security Suite, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Palo Alto Networks IoT/OT Security
Five alternatives
Dragos Platform, Fortinet OT Security Platform, Honeywell Forge, Kaspersky ICS, Palo Alto NetworksTwo alternatives
Forescout Vistaro Platform, Palo Alto Networks IoT/OT SecuritySeven alternatives
Armis Centrix, Claroty xDome, Forescout Vistaro Platform, Fortinet OT Security Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks Guardian, OrdrOne alternative
Fortinet OT Security PlatformMiniMax M2.5Claroty xDomeForescout Vistaro Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoTChangedDragos PlatformClaroty xDome, Dragos Platformagainst: Armis Centrix, Fortinet OT Security PlatformClaroty xDomenothing named
Two alternatives
Dragos Platform, Nozomi Networks GuardianThree alternatives
Armis Centrix, Claroty xDome, Palo Alto Networks IoT/OT SecuritySeven alternatives
Armis Centrix, Claroty xDome, Forescout Vistaro Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Palo Alto Networks Industrial OT Security, Tenable OT SecurityOne alternative
DarktraceFour alternatives
Armis Centrix, Forescout Vistaro Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks GuardianBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 23:31 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 00:53 | yes | 4 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 01:43 | yes | 14 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 01:13 | yes | 16 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 00:03 | yes | 18 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 00:42 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 02:00 | yes | 18 | 32 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 01:13 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 01:40 | no | 0 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 01:39 | yes | 9 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 23:55 | yes | 23 | 47 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 23:59 | yes | 9 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 01:30 | yes | 16 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 01:49 | yes | 4 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 01:14 | yes | 10 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 00:13 | yes | 19 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 23:01 | yes | 24 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 22:49 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 00:22 | yes | 25 | 35 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 23:36 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 01:05 | no | 0 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 01:47 | yes | 20 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 00:34 | yes | 15 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 01:00 | yes | 9 | 36 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 01:21 | yes | 17 | 11 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 01:04 | yes | 8 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 22:48 | yes | 22 | 32 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 00:43 | yes | 18 | 4 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 23:41 | yes | 25 | 11 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 00:01 | yes | 14 | 13 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 22:38 | yes | 25 | 45 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 00:03 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 00:59 | no | 0 | 33 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 01:45 | yes | 23 | 34 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 01:14 | yes | 24 | 30 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 00:54 | yes | 25 | 42 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 01:37 | yes | 16 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 22:56 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 23:16 | yes | 17 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 01:53 | yes | 19 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 22:28 | yes | 20 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 22:19 | yes | 12 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 23:33 | yes | 23 | 58 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 22:31 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 23:56 | yes | 22 | 55 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 00:56 | yes | 21 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 01:47 | yes | 22 | 141 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 00:14 | yes | 14 | 84 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 23:59 | yes | 19 | 13 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 01:27 | yes | 2 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 01:34 | yes | 6 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 00:00 | yes | 20 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 23:52 | yes | 17 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 01:52 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 23:54 | yes | 25 | 68 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 23:22 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 22:11 | yes | 25 | 59 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 01:54 | yes | 18 | 36 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 00:01 | yes | 24 | 130 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 22:33 | yes | 5 | 53 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 23:49 | yes | 18 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 23:47 | yes | 7 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 00:37 | yes | 28 | 40 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 00:18 | yes | 20 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 22:58 | yes | 24 | 12 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 01:50 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 01:48 | yes | 24 | 55 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 22:23 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 01:16 | yes | 10 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 22:10 | yes | 25 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 23:33 | yes | 21 | 186 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 23:53 | no | 0 | 44 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Armis read as Armis Centrix
Cisco Industrial Threat Defense / Cyber Vision read as Cisco Cyber Vision
Claroty read as Claroty xDome
Claroty (including Medigate) read as Claroty xDome
Claroty (xDome / CTD) read as Claroty xDome
Claroty (xDome Platform) read as Claroty xDome
Claroty (xDome Secure Access) read as Claroty xDome
Claroty (xDome/CTD platform) read as Claroty xDome
Claroty Platform read as Claroty xDome
Dragos read as Dragos Platform
Forescout read as Forescout Vistaro Platform
Forescout Platform read as Forescout Vistaro Platform
Fortinet read as Fortinet OT Security Platform
Fortinet (FortiGate & FortiNDR for OT) read as Fortinet OT Security Platform
Fortinet (FortiSRA) read as Fortinet OT Security Platform
Fortinet (Fortinet OT Security Platform) read as Fortinet OT Security Platform
Microsoft read as Microsoft Defender for IoT
Nozomi Networks read as Nozomi Networks Guardian
Nozomi Networks (Guardian/Vantage) read as Nozomi Networks Guardian
Nozomi Networks (Vantage & Guardian) read as Nozomi Networks Guardian
Nozomi Networks (Vantage / Guardian) read as Nozomi Networks Guardian
Tenable read as Tenable OT Security
Tenable OT read as Tenable OT Security
Tenable.ot read as Tenable OT Security
Tenable.ot (formerly OpSec) read as Tenable OT Security
Unresolved, counted raw
Cisco Edge Intelligence
Cisco Industrial Ethernet switches
Claroty CTD
Forescout eyeSentry
Honeywell Forge
Johnson Controls
Kaspersky ICS
Mitsubishi Electric
NetRise
Nozomi OnePass
Optigo Networks
Rockwell/partnered industrial platforms
SUBNET Solutions
Scadafence Platform
Seceon aiSecOT360
SecuriThings
Tenable OT Exposure
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.