Deception technology for enterprise buyers
Asked as “deception technology platform”, and as “honeypot and decoy tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 49 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the October 2026 Edition on October 4, 2026; its answers are read by the distilled judge (ai-indexes-judge-qwen3-14b-run3), not the claude-opus-5 judge of the earlier categories: how the two compare.
Standing · first-choice share
47%
Clear leader
47Acalvio ShadowPlex10Thinkst Canary06Attivo Networks ThreatDefend37others
47% of first choices, clear leader.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the one product at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to head
All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each
Thinkst Canary vs Fortinet FortiDeceptorThinkst Canary vs T-PotThinkst Canary vs Illusive NetworksAcalvio ShadowPlex vs TracebitAcalvio ShadowPlex vs OpenCanaryAcalvio ShadowPlex vs Fortinet FortiDeceptorAcalvio ShadowPlex vs T-PotAcalvio ShadowPlex vs Illusive NetworksTracebit vs OpenCanaryTracebit vs Fortinet FortiDeceptorTracebit vs T-PotTracebit vs Illusive NetworksOpenCanary vs Fortinet FortiDeceptorOpenCanary vs T-PotOpenCanary vs Illusive NetworksFortinet FortiDeceptor vs T-PotFortinet FortiDeceptor vs Illusive NetworksT-Pot vs Illusive Networks
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04C05
06I07
F08
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Acalvio ShadowPlex47%
Acalvio ShadowPlex47%02Thinkst Canary10%
Thinkst Canary10%03Zscaler Deception6%
Zscaler Deception6%04SentinelOne Singularity4%
SentinelOne Singularity4%05CounterCraft2%
06Fidelis Deception2%
Fidelis Deception2%07Illusive Networks2%
08FortiDeceptor0%
What they warned about
Five of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Proofpoint Shadow56%
5 of 9 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“making standalone cost less transparent” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt
Zscaler Deception25%
6 of 24 labels negative · 5 of 14 models
“if your environment is multi-vendor or heavily integrated with other XDR/SIEM/SOAR platforms, verify that the integration depth and data flow meet your operational requirements” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Illusive Networks
28%
5 of 18 labels negative · 4 of 14 models
“Illusive Networks / Proofpoint Deceptions Everywhere is the classic per-user example... total cost grows linearly with headcount/endpoint growth and is penalizing for large companies.” Muse Glimmer 30B, budget prompt
CounterCraft
18%
3 of 17 labels negative · 3 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“$200,000/year minimum on AWS Marketplace — very high entry cost and quote-based pricing” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
78 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1144 links across 265 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. None of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category.
vendor site · Acalvio56 answers · 141 citations · 14 models
40 answers · 40 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Guideflow36 answers · 38 citations · 11 models
34 answers · 44 citations · 11 models
21 answers · 32 citations · 8 models
20 answers · 20 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Fidelis Security19 answers · 28 citations · 10 models
vendor site · FitGap19 answers · 22 citations · 9 models
18 answers · 22 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Gitnux16 answers · 18 citations · 9 models
15 answers · 20 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Zscaler15 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
40 answers · 13 models
36 answers · 12 models
34 answers · 11 models
32 answers · 10 models
23 answers · 9 models
19 answers · 12 models
15 answers · 9 models
13 answers · 10 models
13 answers · 8 models
12 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best deception technology platform”, “deception technology platform”, “deception technology platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acalvio ShadowPlex acalvio.com | 47% | 110 | 20 | 1 | 2,358 | 3 | 3 | |
| Thinkst Canary thinkst.com | 10% | 103 | 590 | 8 | 189 | |||
| Rapid7 parent site Rapid7 Incident Command 6%, Rapid7 InsightIDR 2% | 8% | 115 | 14,800 | 798 | ||||
| Zscaler parent site Zscaler Deception 6% | 6% | 40 | 60,500 | 3,104 | ||||
| Attivo Networks ThreatDefend | 6% | |||||||
| SentinelOne sentinelone.com SentinelOne Singularity 4%, SentinelOne Singularity Hologram 0% | 4% | 534 | 33,100 | 1,675 | 446,702 company | $780 | 22 | 5 |
| CounterCraft | 2% | 590 | 0 | |||||
| Tracebit tracebit.com | 2% | 39 | 390 | 3 | 167 | $813 | 17 | |
| Fidelis Deception fidelissecurity.com | 2% | 35 | 10 | 0 | 24,973 | 6 | 4 | |
| Illusive Networks | 2% | 40 | 0 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 21 sites; 6 of them are among the sites the models cited here (acalvio.com, countercraftsec.com, f6s.com, fidelissecurity.com, linkedin.com, zscaler.com). The first result for “best deception technology platform” is cybertrap.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best deception technology platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which honeypot and decoy tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade deception technology platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best deception technology platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a deception technology platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which deception technology platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Acalvio ShadowPlex, IllusiveAcalvio ShadowPlex, Thinkst CanaryChangedIllusiveno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
FortiDeceptor, Smokescreen, TracebitTwo alternatives
CounterCraft, FortiDeceptorFive alternatives
Acalvio ShadowPlex, Attivo Networks, FortiDeceptor, Smokescreen, TracebitGPT-5.4 miniAcalvio ShadowPlexZscaler DeceptionChangedAcalvio ShadowPlex, Zscaler DeceptionThinkst Canaryno first choicenothing named
One alternative
Thinkst CanaryOne alternative
Thinkst CanaryFive alternatives
Adlumin honeypot / deception features, Illusive, Rapid7 InsightIDR Deception, SentinelOne deception capabilities, Thinkst CanaryOne alternative
Zscaler DeceptionGemini 3.5 FlashTracebitThinkst CanaryChangedAcalvio ShadowPlexAcalvio ShadowPlexagainst: SentinelOne Singularity Identity, Tenableno first choiceagainst: Attivo Networks, Illusive Networks, Smokescreen Technologies, TrapX Security
Four alternatives
Acalvio ShadowPlex, Proofpoint, SentinelOne Singularity, Thinkst CanaryThree alternatives
Acalvio ShadowPlex, Commvault ThreatWise, SentinelOne Singularity DeceptionFive alternatives
CounterCraft Active Defense Platform, Proofpoint Identity Threat Defense, SentinelOne Singularity Hologram, Thinkst Canary, Zscaler DeceptionTwo alternatives
Fortinet FortiDeceptor, Thinkst CanaryPerplexity SonarAcalvio ShadowPlexThinkst CanaryChangedAcalvio ShadowPlexAcalvio ShadowPlexno first choicenothing named
One alternative
Zscaler DeceptionTwo alternatives
FortiDeceptor, TrapsterFive alternatives
Cynet deception capabilities, Fidelis Deception, Fortinet FortiDeceptor, Proofpoint Shadow, Zscaler DeceptionOne alternative
CyberTrapGrok 4.1 FastAcalvio ShadowPlexAcalvio ShadowPlexHeldagainst: OpenCanary, T-PotAcalvio ShadowPlexRapid7 InsightIDRagainst: Acalvio ShadowPlex, Attivo, CounterCraft, FortiDeceptor, Illusive, Proofpoint, SentinelOne Singularity, Smokescreen, Zscaler DeceptionAcalvio ShadowPlex, CounterCraftagainst: Fidelis Deception, Fortinet FortiDeceptor, Proofpoint Shadow, Rapid7 InsightIDR Deception, Zscaler Deception
Two alternatives
Fortinet FortiDeceptor, SentinelOne Singularity HologramTwo alternatives
SentinelOne Singularity, Thinkst CanaryFive alternatives
CounterCraft, Fortinet FortiDeceptor, Proofpoint Identity Threat Defense, Thinkst Canary, Zscaler DeceptionOne alternative
Thinkst CanaryOne alternative
Fortinet FortiDeceptorMistral SmallAcalvio ShadowPlexAcalvio ShadowPlexHeldAcalvio ShadowPlex, Fidelis DeceptionRapid7 Incident Command, Thinkst Canaryno first choiceagainst: Fortinet, SentinelOne Singularity, Zscaler Deception
Two alternatives
CounterCraft, SentinelOne Singularity HologramTwo alternatives
Attivo Networks ThreatDefend, SmokescreenOne alternative
FortiDeceptorDeepSeek V4 FlashAcalvio ShadowPlexAcalvio ShadowPlexHeldagainst: Fidelis DeceptionAcalvio ShadowPlex, SentinelOne SingularityAcalvio ShadowPlexagainst: CounterCraft, Proofpoint Shadow, SentinelOne SingularityAcalvio ShadowPlexagainst: Attivo, Fidelis Deception, Illusive, ThreatWise, TrapX pre-acquisition
Six alternatives
FortiDeceptor, Illusive Networks, Proofpoint Shadow, SentinelOne Singularity, Tracebit, Zscaler DeceptionTwo alternatives
Fortinet FortiDeceptor, SentinelOne SingularityFour alternatives
CounterCraft, Illusive Networks, Thinkst Canary, TracebitOne alternative
FortiDeceptorTwo alternatives
Fidelis Deception, SentinelOne SingularityLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldno first choiceno first choiceAttivo Networks ThreatDefendnothing named
Three alternatives
DeceptIQ, SentinelOne Singularity Hologram, TrapX DeceptionGridQwen 3.7 FlashAcalvio ShadowPlex, Fidelis DeceptionDeception TechnologiesChangedagainst: T-PotAcalvio ShadowPlex, Fidelis Deceptionagainst: CanaryProofpoint Identity Threat Defense, Rapid7 Incident Commandno first choiceagainst: CanaryWeb, Canarytokens, Glastopf, Honeyd, Honeypot-Project, Illusive Networks
Two alternatives
Guardicore, ThruNestOne alternative
DeceptionGridThree alternatives
Attivo, CounterCraft, Thinkst CanaryKimi K2Acalvio ShadowPlex, Attivo Networks ThreatDefend, SentinelOne SingularityAcalvio ShadowPlexChangedAcalvio ShadowPlex, Illusive Networksagainst: TrapX SecurityIllusive Networksagainst: TrellixAcalvio ShadowPlexagainst: Attivo Networks, Illusive Networks, LogRhythm
Two alternatives
Fidelis Deception, Zscaler DeceptionOne alternative
SentinelOne SingularityThree alternatives
CyberTrap, Cymulate, SentinelOne SingularityOne alternative
Acalvio ShadowPlexFour alternatives
CounterCraft, Proofpoint, SentinelOne Singularity, Zscaler DeceptionGLM 4.7 FlashXAttivo Networks ThreatDefendZscaler DeceptionChangedAcalvio ShadowPlexSentinelOne Singularityno first choiceagainst: FortiDeceptor, HFish, Honeyd, Proofpoint Shadow, Rapid7 Incident Command, T-Pot, Zscaler Deception
Four alternatives
Cynet, FortiDeceptor, Illusive Networks, TrapX SecurityOne alternative
Acalvio ShadowPlexFour alternatives
Attivo Networks, Illusive Networks, Rapid7 InsightIDR, TrapX SecurityTwo alternatives
FortiDeceptor, Proofpoint Identity Threat DefenseMiniMax M2.5no first choiceAcalvio ShadowPlexChangedAttivo NetworksZscaler Deceptionagainst: CounterCraft, FortiDeceptor, Proofpoint Shadowno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
DeceptIQ, TrapEye, Zscaler DeceptionFive alternatives
Guardicore, Illusive Networks, Rapid7 InsightIDR, Smokescreen Technologies, TrapX SecurityTwo alternatives
Rapid7 InsightIDR, SentinelOne SingularityGPT-6 LunaAcalvio ShadowPlexAcalvio ShadowPlexHeldno first choiceRapid7 Incident Commandno first choiceagainst: Commvault ThreatWise, Legacy Attivo / ThreatDefend proposals, Proofpoint Shadow, Thinkst Canary, Zscaler Deception
Three alternatives
FortiDeceptor, Proofpoint Shadow, Thinkst CanaryTwo alternatives
Singularity Identity, Thinkst CanaryOne alternative
FortiDeceptorMuse Glimmer 30BAttivo Networks – now SentinelOne Singularity DeceptionSentinelOne Singularity Deception, formerly Attivo NetworksChangedagainst: Thinkst CanaryAttivo Networksagainst: Fidelis DeceptionAcalvio ShadowPlexagainst: Illusive Networksno first choiceagainst: Attivo Networks, Illusive Networks, Smokescreen, Zscaler Deception
Two alternatives
Acalvio ShadowPlex, Illusive NetworksTwo alternatives
Acalvio ShadowPlex, FortiDeceptorThree alternatives
Acalvio ShadowPlex, Cymmetria MazeRunner, Illusive NetworksTwo alternatives
Cymmetria, FortiDeceptorBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 01:39 | yes | 12 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 00:42 | yes | 2 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 00:41 | yes | 22 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 01:27 | yes | 18 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 00:42 | yes | 23 | 11 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 01:35 | yes | 12 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 00:31 | yes | 21 | 50 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 01:05 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 00:30 | yes | 9 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 00:19 | yes | 24 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 23:11 | yes | 23 | 69 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 23:50 | yes | 5 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-04 23:32 | yes | 5 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-04 22:49 | yes | 14 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 01:38 | yes | 16 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 22:31 | yes | 1 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 22:48 | yes | 12 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 00:31 | yes | 33 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 23:31 | yes | 21 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 01:20 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 00:48 | yes | 24 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 22:45 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 00:19 | no | 0 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 23:20 | yes | 23 | 49 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 01:00 | yes | 19 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 01:09 | yes | 9 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 01:17 | yes | 3 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 01:22 | yes | 13 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 01:43 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 01:32 | yes | 6 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 01:10 | yes | 35 | 43 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 01:27 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 22:13 | yes | 17 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 00:14 | yes | 22 | 11 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 01:02 | yes | 23 | 80 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 22:40 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 22:30 | yes | 14 | 34 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 23:25 | yes | 20 | 30 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 01:05 | yes | 22 | 57 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 00:05 | yes | 14 | 29 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 00:44 | yes | 7 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 00:18 | yes | 19 | 39 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 00:40 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 01:25 | yes | 1 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 23:41 | yes | 19 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 01:10 | yes | 18 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 23:35 | yes | 19 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 01:36 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 01:56 | yes | 24 | 32 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 01:45 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 23:15 | yes | 14 | 55 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 01:57 | yes | 24 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 22:32 | yes | 21 | 35 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 23:41 | yes | 21 | 42 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 01:34 | yes | 2 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 01:14 | yes | 23 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 01:28 | yes | 18 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 00:01 | yes | 0 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 23:08 | yes | 7 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 01:19 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 00:24 | yes | 16 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 23:20 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 22:41 | yes | 19 | 53 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 23:07 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 01:16 | yes | 5 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 00:55 | yes | 24 | 33 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 01:10 | yes | 23 | 137 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 23:35 | no | 0 | 47 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 01:14 | yes | 3 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 01:41 | yes | 11 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 22:22 | yes | 19 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 00:53 | yes | 1 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 23:52 | yes | 15 | 30 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 00:07 | yes | 20 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 00:47 | yes | 21 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 23:26 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 23:07 | yes | 21 | 55 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 00:18 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 22:10 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 01:48 | yes | 21 | 48 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 23:16 | yes | 19 | 75 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 01:40 | yes | 5 | 41 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 00:19 | yes | 5 | 30 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 01:41 | yes | 23 | 28 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Acalvio read as Acalvio ShadowPlex
Acalvio (ShadowPlex / 360 Deception) read as Acalvio ShadowPlex
Acalvio (ShadowPlex) read as Acalvio ShadowPlex
Acalvio Technologies read as Acalvio ShadowPlex
Acalvio Technologies – ShadowPlex read as Acalvio ShadowPlex
Fidelis read as Fidelis Deception
Fidelis Cybersecurity (Deception Solution / Elevate Platform) read as Fidelis Deception
Fidelis Security read as Fidelis Deception
Rapid7 read as Rapid7 InsightIDR
Rapid7 (InsightVM & InsightIDR) read as Rapid7 InsightIDR
SentinelOne read as SentinelOne Singularity
SentinelOne (Attivo Networks) read as SentinelOne Singularity
SentinelOne (Attivo) read as SentinelOne Singularity
SentinelOne (formerly Attivo Networks) read as SentinelOne Singularity
SentinelOne (with Attivo Networks integration, now Singularity Hologram) read as SentinelOne Singularity
Zscaler read as Zscaler Deception
Unresolved, counted raw
Adlumin honeypot / deception features
Attivo Networks – now SentinelOne Singularity Deception
Canary (Canary Tokens / Honeypot Solutions)
CanaryWeb
CounterCraft Active Defense Platform
Cynet deception capabilities
DataEnforce AVALON
Deception Technologies
DeceptionGrid
Glastopf
Honeypot-Project
Legacy Attivo / ThreatDefend proposals
Rapid7's deception technology
SentinelOne Singularity Deception, formerly Attivo Networks
SentinelOne deception capabilities
Singularity Identity
ThreatWise
ThruNest
TrapX pre-acquisition
Trapster Ballpoint
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.