AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Security operations › Deception › Acalvio ShadowPlex vs Fortinet FortiDeceptor
Deception technology · October 2026 Edition

Acalvio ShadowPlex vs Fortinet FortiDeceptor

Four of fourteen models named Acalvio ShadowPlex first on the direct prompt; one named Fortinet FortiDeceptor. Acalvio ShadowPlex was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Fortinet FortiDeceptor by seven and Acalvio ShadowPlex carries 42 labels and Fortinet FortiDeceptor 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Acalvio ShadowPlex

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Fortinet FortiDeceptor

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share9%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate14%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#5A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels4210A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Acalvio ShadowPlex reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Thinkst Canary was named alongside these two in eight of the fourteen direct answers. Thinkst Canary vs Acalvio ShadowPlex · Thinkst Canary vs Fortinet FortiDeceptor · Acalvio ShadowPlex vs Tracebit

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the deception technology page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Acalvio ShadowPlexFirst choices, of fourteen modelsFortinet FortiDeceptor
Direct411 against Acalvio ShadowPlex
Paraphrase001 against Acalvio ShadowPlex
Comparative80
Budget-constrained002 against Acalvio ShadowPlex
Scale-constrained001 against Acalvio ShadowPlex
Negative101 against Acalvio ShadowPlex
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Acalvio ShadowPlex and Fortinet FortiDeceptor were named in the same answer twenty-one times, of the 110 answers naming Acalvio ShadowPlex and the 23 naming Fortinet FortiDeceptor. In those answers Fortinet FortiDeceptor took the first choice one time and Acalvio ShadowPlex ten.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Acalvio ShadowPlex and Fortinet FortiDeceptor stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Acalvio ShadowPlex Fortinet FortiDeceptor first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Acalvio ShadowPlex on the left and Fortinet FortiDeceptor on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Acalvio ShadowPlex and Fortinet FortiDeceptor stood in it.

Acalvio ShadowPlex first, Fortinet FortiDeceptor an alternative

4 of 14 modelsFortinet FortiDeceptor was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Perplexity SonarAcalvio ShadowPlex alternatives: Fortinet FortiDeceptor, Thinkst Canary
Grok 4.1 FastAcalvio ShadowPlex alternatives: Fortinet FortiDeceptor, Thinkst Canary
Mistral SmallAcalvio ShadowPlex, Attivo Networks ThreatDefend
MiniMax M2.5Acalvio ShadowPlex, Illusive Networks

Fortinet FortiDeceptor first, Acalvio ShadowPlex an alternative

1 of 14 modelsAcalvio ShadowPlex was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Muse Glimmer 30BFortinet FortiDeceptor, Rapid7 Incident Command alternatives: Acalvio ShadowPlex, Proofpoint, Thinkst Canary

Neither was the first choice, one was named

4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniThinkst Canary alternatives: Acalvio ShadowPlex
DeepSeek V4 FlashTracebit alternatives: Acalvio ShadowPlex, Fidelis Deception, FortiDeceptor
GLM 4.7 FlashXRapid7 InsightIDR alternatives: Acalvio ShadowPlex, Fortinet FortiDeceptor
GPT-6 LunaTracebit alternatives: Acalvio ShadowPlex, Thinkst Canary, Zscaler Deception

Neither was named

5 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Deceptive Bytes alternatives: Acalvio 360 Deception, Illusive, Thinkst Canary
Gemini 3.5 FlashThinkst Canary alternatives: SentinelOne Singularity Hologram, Tracebit
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Qwen 3.7 FlashHoneypot.io alternatives: Attivo Networks, Cymulate, Microsoft Defender XDR
Kimi K2Thinkst Canary alternatives: TrapEye, Trapster

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Acalvio ShadowPlex0%#9 of 9
Fortinet FortiDeceptor0%#– of 9
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Acalvio ShadowPlex leads by seven points.
Acalvio ShadowPlex9%#2 of 11
Fortinet FortiDeceptor2%#5 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Acalvio ShadowPlex leads by forty-seven points.
Acalvio ShadowPlex47%#1 of 8
Fortinet FortiDeceptor0%#– of 8
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Acalvio ShadowPlex

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“look out for architectural red flags when evaluating active deception platforms (such as those from Acalvio, CounterCraft, or Fidelis Security)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“massive enterprise "deception grids" (such as Acalvio, Fidelis, or SentinelOne Attivo) are highly effective, they are cost-prohibitive” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“this complexity often translates to higher pricing and more required administrative upkeep” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · soft negative
“Consistently ranked as a leader in GigaOm’s Radar Report (2023–2024)... stands out for its centralized Deception Farm architecture, cloud-native design, and AI-driven countermeasures” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
“I recommend requesting demos from Illusive Networks and Acalvio specifically, as they appear most focused on the mid-market segment.” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“If you want enterprise-scale automation with very low operational burden, Acalvio is the recognized leader.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice

What the models said about Fortinet FortiDeceptor

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“Rapid7 or Fortinet FortiDeceptor are the most frequently cited value choices” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
“Platform-Integrated Deception (e.g., SentinelOne Singularity Deception, Fortinet FortiDeceptor)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · alternative
“Choose FortiDeceptor if your company is already a Fortinet shop or has OT/IoT exposure.” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.