Index › Products › Axio360 · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Axio360

17Judge labels

3First choices

2Negative labels

7 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Axio360 was named 3 times in Cyber risk quant, where CyberSaint CyberStrong led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business43 of 145

under the label threshold

Mid-market7 of 116

under the label threshold

Enterprise6 of 74

under the label threshold

In cyber risk quant · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Axio360 for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Cyber risk quantification	Security operations	4%	7 of 116	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by CyberSaint CyberStrong at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Axio360 yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Axio360 across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	1	1	2
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labels2

Paraphrase3 labels1

Comparative5 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“My default pick would be Axio360's Quantification module” GPT-6 Luna · Cyber risk quant · direct prompt · first choice

“Top Recommendation: Axio360 (Axio)” Kimi K2 · Cyber risk quant · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“transparent business scenarios and control “what-if” analysis → Axio360” GPT-6 Luna · Cyber risk quant · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Axio360, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Axio360 was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Kovrr11 of 173Not among the top eight

SAFE Security9 of 170Not among the top eight

RiskLens6 of 171Not among the top eight

SAFE One5 of 171Not among the top eight

Bitsight3 of 170Not among the top eight

FairCRQ2 of 171Not among the top eight

XRATOR2 of 171Not among the top eight

Axio2 of 170Not among the top eight

Balbix2 of 170Not among the top eight

CyberSaint CyberStrong2 of 170Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Axio360. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 17 answers that named Axio360 and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

axio.com9

kovrr.com8

trycomp.ai8

riskpublishing.com7

vcisolite.com5

vcso.ai5

cybersaint.io4

f6s.com4

mitigata.com4

securityboulevard.com4

No domain is on file for Axio360, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

trycomp.ai/hub/top-risk-management-software8

riskpublishing.com/best-cyber-risk-quantification-platforms-compar7

axio.com/crq6

kovrr.com/cyber-risk-quantification6

vcisolite.com/blog/crq-tools-and-platforms-20265

vcso.ai/learn/cyber-risk-quantification-tools-comparison5

f6s.com/software/category/cyber-risk-quantification4

kovrr.com/pricing-crq4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Axio360 stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 50 a month (“axio360”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Its own site: No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 7 of 116 in cyber risk quant

Segment leader

25%

CyberSaint CyberStrong

First choices: 3 across its categories
Named in: 17 answers
Its own site cited: No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Axio360

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Axio360; a claim can dispute any of them.

Axio360 (Axio) 1

Follow Axio360

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Axio360's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Axio360, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Axio360 by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Axio360 is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Axio360, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.