AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Balbix · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Balbix

46Judge labels
1First choices
8Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Cyber risk quant for enterprise buyers
Rank 22 of 116 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 24% of its 17 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Balbix →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In cyber risk quant · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Balbix for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Cyber risk quantificationSecurity operations0%22 of 11624%17accepted challenger
SaaS security posture managementSecurity operations0%56 of 950%1under 10 labels · led by Wing Security at 30%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Balbix yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Balbix across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00101
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2002136
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash01012
Llama 4 Maverick01001
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX11002
MiniMax M2.501001
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B01203

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct8 labels1
Paraphrase6 labelsNone
Comparative18 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained5 labelsNone
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative5 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative46 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Balbix uses a Bayesian Network-based model... It is highly automated and focuses heavily on internal risk.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Cyber risk quant · comparative prompt · first choice
“If you have a massive, constantly changing IT estate and want automated, continuous risk scoring → Balbix” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Cyber risk quant · comparative prompt · alternative
“Balbix is the leading AI-powered platform for exposure management and cyber risk quantification (CRQ).” Muse Glimmer 30B · Cyber risk quant · comparative prompt · alternative
“Consider Balbix or Axio if you want modern CRQ with automation and business-friendly outputs.” Kimi K2 · Cyber risk quant · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“some reviews note limited customization for advanced modeling, data alignment challenges in dynamic inventories” Grok 4.20 · Cyber risk quant · negative prompt · soft negative
“Continuous asset-level risk assessment (better for larger orgs) | Enterprise” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Cyber risk quant · direct prompt · soft negative
“GRC-integrated or asset-focused, but more enterprise-oriented ($75K+)” Grok 4.20 · Cyber risk quant · direct prompt · soft negative
“powerful but start at $10K+/year, so skip unless scaling up” Grok 4.20 · Cyber risk quant · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Balbix, over the 46 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Balbix was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
SAFE Security37 of 4625Not among the top eight
Axio34 of 460Not among the top eight
Kovrr29 of 461Not among the top eight
RiskLens18 of 463Not among the top eight
CyberSaint CyberStrong16 of 464Not among the top eight
Bitsight12 of 460Not among the top eight
Resilience10 of 460Not among the top eight
KPMG9 of 461Not among the top eight
Black Kite4 of 460Not among the top eight
SecurityScorecard4 of 460Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Balbix. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 46 of the 46 answers that named Balbix and are not a share of its labels.

Search and answers

balbix.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Balbix takes 0% of first choices and CyberSaint CyberStrong takes 25%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “cyber risk quantification tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “cyber risk quantification tools”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
480 a month (“balbix”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
5 a month
Organic visits to its site
about a month
Searches its site ranks for
· in the top three
Sites linking to it
2,345
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 22 of 116 in cyber risk quant
Segment leader
25%
CyberSaint CyberStrong
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
46 answers
Its own site cited
in 46 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on balbix.com
858
subdomains included
Content
795
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
9 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog50542026-09-10TPRM, RMM
Report or ebook5912026-08-01TPRM
News or press5502024-05-28TPRM
Glossary or explainer4902026-02-23CSPM, ASM
Podcast or video3302026-03-11TPRM, GRC
Webinar or virtual event2702026-05-20TPRM
Comparison2412026-09-11TPRM, EDR
Case study1912026-07-08TPRM
Template or tool1392026-09-25
Conference or event1112026-07-21TPRM

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page balbix.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name TPRM (97); 0 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Balbix

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Balbix's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Balbix, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Balbix by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Balbix is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Balbix, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at balbix.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.