Observability platforms for small business buyers
Asked as “observability platform”, and as “full-stack monitoring platform for logs, metrics and traces”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 61 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
39%
Contested · New Relic 15%
39Grafana15New Relic11SigNoz34others
39% of first choices, contested.
Since September 2026▲+5Since September 2026: 32% → 37%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Grafana held the lead, +5 points on 32%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Grafana39%Contested▲+5Since September 2026: 32% → 37%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageMid-marketGrafana27%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: New Relic (31%) replaces Grafana (29% then, 24% now), 7 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →Enterprise
Datadog37%Contested=heldSince September 2026: 36% → 36%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →
Grafana39%Contested▲+5Since September 2026: 32% → 37%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageMid-marketGrafana27%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: New Relic (31%) replaces Grafana (29% then, 24% now), 7 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →EnterpriseDatadog37%Contested=heldSince September 2026: 36% → 36%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Grafana39%5%75endorsed leader▲+5Since September 2026: 32% → 37%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.32% → 37%
Grafana39%5%75endorsed leader▲+5Since September 2026: 32% → 37%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.32% → 37%02
New Relic15%15%65accepted challenger▼−10Since September 2026: 27% → 17%, −10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.27% → 17%
New Relic15%15%65accepted challenger▼−10Since September 2026: 27% → 17%, −10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.27% → 17%03
SigNoz11%3%33accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 7% → 9%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 9%
SigNoz11%3%33accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 7% → 9%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 9%04
Better Stack10%0%24accepted challenger▼−1Since September 2026: 12% → 11%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.12% → 11%
Better Stack10%0%24accepted challenger▼−1Since September 2026: 12% → 11%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.12% → 11%05Datadog8%70%67criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 12% → 9%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.12% → 9%
Datadog8%70%67criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 12% → 9%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.12% → 9%06
OpenObserve3%0%19accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
OpenObserve3%0%19accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%07
Uptrace2%0%17accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
Uptrace2%0%17accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%08
Honeycomb2%14%21accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
Honeycomb2%14%21accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%09
Site24x72%0%10accepted challenger▼−5Since September 2026: 7% → 2%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 2%
Site24x72%0%10accepted challenger▼−5Since September 2026: 7% → 2%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 2%10
Prometheus2%33%15criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Prometheus2%33%15criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%Show the two products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
11
Splunk0%79%14criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Splunk0%79%14criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%12
Dynatrace0%69%26criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Dynatrace0%69%26criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Grafana vs OpenObserveGrafana vs DynatraceGrafana vs HoneycombGrafana vs PrometheusNew Relic vs DatadogNew Relic vs SigNozNew Relic vs OpenObserveNew Relic vs DynatraceNew Relic vs HoneycombNew Relic vs PrometheusDatadog vs SigNozDatadog vs OpenObserveDatadog vs DynatraceDatadog vs HoneycombDatadog vs PrometheusSigNoz vs OpenObserveSigNoz vs DynatraceSigNoz vs HoneycombSigNoz vs PrometheusOpenObserve vs DynatraceOpenObserve vs HoneycombOpenObserve vs PrometheusDynatrace vs HoneycombDynatrace vs PrometheusHoneycomb vs Prometheus
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203040506070809101112Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Grafana39%
Grafana39%02New Relic15%
New Relic15%03SigNoz11%
SigNoz11%04Better Stack10%
Better Stack10%05Datadog8%
Datadog8%06OpenObserve3%
OpenObserve3%07Uptrace2%
Uptrace2%08Honeycomb2%
Honeycomb2%09Site24x72%
Site24x72%10Prometheus2%
Prometheus2%11Splunk0%
Splunk0%12Dynatrace0%
Dynatrace0%What they warned about
Two of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Datadog70%
47 of 67 labels negative · 14 of 14 models · 15 hard negative
“"Avoid Datadog for now unless you have specific compliance requirements... it's typically 2x more expensive at small business scale."” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Dynatrace69%
18 of 26 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 9 hard negative
“"Setting up tools like Dynatrace or AppDynamics is not 'plug-and-play'... massive overkill for small businesses."” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
New Relic15%
10 of 65 labels negative · 9 of 14 models
“commonly recommended entry-point options for SMBs, but they are typically more expensive as you scale” Perplexity Sonar, direct prompt
Splunk79%
11 of 14 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“Per-GB data ingestion pricing (prohibitive for small businesses)... Best suited for massive-scale log analytics and SIEM, not small deployments” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
70 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 981 links across 223 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 12 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Uptrace33 answers · 38 citations · 11 models
32 answers · 32 citations · 11 models
vendor site · New Relic31 answers · 44 citations · 11 models
vendor site · OpenObserve29 answers · 37 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Middleware.io25 answers · 31 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Grafana24 answers · 42 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Metoro20 answers · 21 citations · 10 models
vendor site · SigNoz18 answers · 35 citations · 10 models
vendor site · CubeAPM16 answers · 18 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Motadata16 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
15 answers · 16 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Dash014 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
32 answers · 11 models
24 answers · 10 models
20 answers · 10 models
19 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 9 models
14 answers · 7 models
13 answers · 7 models
13 answers · 8 models
12 answers · 7 models
11 answers · 5 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best observability platform”, “observability platform”, “observability platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grafana grafana.com Grafana 39%, Prometheus + Grafana 3%, Grafana + Prometheus 0%, Grafana Loki 0% and 1 more | 43% | 247 | 40,500 | 2,627 | 84,520 | 116 | ||
| New Relic newrelic.com | 15% | 629 | 14,800 | 843 | 83,276 | $412 | 89 | 4 |
| SigNoz signoz.io | 11% | 208 | 2,400 | 52 | 7,244 | 1 | ||
| Better Stack betterstack.com | 10% | 285 | 1,600 | 1,017 | 41,811 | 119 | ||
| Datadog datadoghq.com | 8% | 585 | 74,000 | 3,541 | 159,408 | $633 | 120 | |
| OpenObserve openobserve.ai | 3% | 157 | 1,600 | 9 | 4,825 | 7 | 8 | |
| Uptrace uptrace.dev | 2% | 58 | 210 | 3 | 7,088 | |||
| Honeycomb honeycomb.io | 2% | 89 | 135,000 | 13,732 | 6,603 | 65 | ||
| Site24x7 site24x7.com | 2% | 214 | 1,300 | 61 | 174,542 | $522 | 120 | |
| Sentry sentry.io | 2% | 269 | 90,500 | 21,086 | 254,686 | 120 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 17 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (metoro.io, motadata.com, newrelic.com, openobserve.ai). The first result for “best observability platform” is reddit.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best observability platform for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which full-stack monitoring platform for logs, metrics and traces would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top observability platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best observability platform for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating an observability platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which observability platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Grafana, New Relicagainst: DynatraceDatadogChangedagainst: SplunkBetter Stackagainst: DatadogPrometheus + Grafanaagainst: Datadogno first choiceagainst: Chronosphere, Datadog, Honeycomb, New Relic, Splunk
One alternative
Prometheus + GrafanaFive alternatives
Elastic Stack, Grafana, Honeycomb, New Relic, PrometheusThree alternatives
Grafana, New Relic, UptraceTwo alternatives
Grafana, Grafana LokiGPT-5.4 miniGrafanaagainst: DatadogGrafanaHeldagainst: DynatraceGrafana, New Relicagainst: DatadogGrafana, SigNozagainst: Datadogno first choiceagainst: Chronosphere, Datadog, Dynatrace, Splunk Observability Cloud
One alternative
New RelicOne alternative
New RelicTwo alternatives
Honeycomb, SigNozGemini 3.5 FlashHoneycombagainst: DatadogBetter StackChangedagainst: Datadog, DynatraceBetter Stackagainst: DatadogGrafanaagainst: Elastic Observability, Grafana Loki, Jaeger, PrometheusBetter Stack, Sentryagainst: Datadog, Grafana, Grafana Loki, New Relic, Prometheusagainst: Datadog, Dynatrace, Elastic Stack, Grafana, Prometheus, Splunk
Three alternatives
Better Stack, Grafana, New RelicTwo alternatives
Grafana, New RelicFour alternatives
Grafana, Honeycomb, New Relic, SigNozFour alternatives
Better Stack, Honeycomb, New Relic, OpenObserveTwo alternatives
Grafana, HoneycombPerplexity SonarOpenObserveagainst: New RelicBetter StackChangedDatadogGrafanano first choiceagainst: Datadog, Dynatrace, Splunk Observability Cloud
Two alternatives
Datadog, UptraceFour alternatives
Datadog, Dynatrace, Grafana + Prometheus, UptraceFive alternatives
Better Stack, Dash0, Grafana, New Relic, UptraceTwo alternatives
OpenObserve, Site24x7Grok 4.1 FastGrafanaagainst: DatadogNew RelicChangedagainst: DatadogGrafana, SigNozagainst: DatadogGrafanano first choiceagainst: Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic, Splunk Observability Cloud
Two alternatives
New Relic, Site24x7Two alternatives
Grafana, SigNozTwo alternatives
Better Stack, New RelicFour alternatives
Better Stack, New Relic, OpenObserve, SigNozMistral SmallDatadogDatadog, New RelicChangedno first choiceGrafana, SigNozDatadog, Grafanaagainst: Dynatrace, Splunkagainst: AppDynamics, Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic
Two alternatives
Elastic Observability, OpenObserveOne alternative
GrafanaFive alternatives
Datadog, Grafana, Honeycomb, Netdata, New RelicThree alternatives
Grafana Loki, Prometheus, Site24x7Two alternatives
Elastic Observability, HoneycombDeepSeek V4 FlashBetter Stackagainst: DatadogNew RelicChangedagainst: Datadog, SigNoz, SplunkGrafana, New Relicagainst: DatadogGrafanaagainst: Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic, SplunkGrafana, New Relic, SigNozagainst: Datadogagainst: Datadog, New Relic, Splunk
Two alternatives
Dash0, GrafanaOne alternative
GrafanaThree alternatives
Better Stack, Honeycomb, SigNozTwo alternatives
OpenObserve, SigNozLlama 4 MaverickUptracePaessler PRTGChangedno first choiceSite24x7no first choiceagainst: Datadog, Dynatrace
Five alternatives
Checkmk, Dash0, Dynatrace, New Relic, Site24x7Three alternatives
Grafana, SigNoz, UptraceQwen 3.7 FlashNew Relic, SigNozagainst: Grafana, PrometheusGrafana, New RelicChangedagainst: DatadogDatadogagainst: HoneycombGrafana, New Relicno first choiceagainst: Azure Monitor, CloudWatch, Datadog, Dynatrace, Elastic Stack, New Relic, Prometheus, Splunk
One alternative
DatadogTwo alternatives
Grafana, New RelicTwo alternatives
Site24x7, UptraceFive alternatives
Datadog, Grafana, New Relic, Site24x7, UptraceKimi K2Better Stackagainst: DatadogGrafanaChangedagainst: DatadogBetter Stack, Grafanaagainst: Datadog, HoneycombSigNozGrafana, New Relicagainst: Datadogagainst: AppDynamics, Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic, Splunk Observability Cloud
Three alternatives
Grafana, Sentry, SigNozTwo alternatives
Better Stack, SigNozTwo alternatives
New Relic, SigNozTwo alternatives
Grafana, OpenObserveGLM 4.7 FlashXGrafanaagainst: DatadogBetter StackChangedagainst: DatadogGrafanaGrafana, Prometheusagainst: Datadogno first choiceagainst: AppDynamics, Datadog, Dynatrace, Splunk
One alternative
New RelicFour alternatives
Grafana, Observe, OpenObserve, UptraceFour alternatives
Better Stack, Datadog, New Relic, SigNozFive alternatives
Better Stack, Grafana Loki, New Relic, OpenObserve, TempoMiniMax M2.5Datadog, Grafanaagainst: Splunkno first choiceChangedGrafana + Prometheus, SigNozagainst: DatadogGrafana, Prometheus + Grafanaagainst: Datadogno first choiceagainst: Datadog, Splunkagainst: Datadog, Dynatrace
Two alternatives
New Relic, UptraceOne alternative
New RelicGPT-6 LunaGrafanaGrafanaHeldNew RelicGrafanano first choiceagainst: Datadog, Grafana, New Relic, Self-managed Elastic, Splunk Observability Cloud
Three alternatives
Datadog, Honeycomb, New RelicOne alternative
New RelicFour alternatives
Datadog, Grafana, Honeycomb, SigNozOne alternative
New RelicMuse Glimmer 30BGrafanaagainst: DatadogSigNozChangedagainst: Datadog, DynatraceGrafana Cloud / LGTM Stackagainst: DatadogOpenObserve, SigNozagainst: Datadogno first choiceagainst: Datadog, Dynatraceagainst: AppDynamics, Datadog, Dynatrace
Four alternatives
CubeAPM, New Relic, OpenObserve, SigNozTwo alternatives
Grafana, Middleware.ioFive alternatives
Better Stack, New Relic, OpenObserve, SigNoz, UptraceFour alternatives
Grafana, New Relic, Site24x7, UptraceFour alternatives
Better Stack, Grafana, New Relic, OpenObserveBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:47 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 07:47 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:18 | yes | 8 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:12 | yes | 18 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:25 | yes | 24 | 11 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:48 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 13:47 | yes | 24 | 40 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:29 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 12:30 | no | 0 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:37 | yes | 20 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:35 | yes | 16 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:31 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 12:01 | yes | 4 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 12:53 | yes | 24 | 32 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 13:17 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 12:06 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 07:44 | yes | 7 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:51 | yes | 25 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 13:48 | yes | 25 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:48 | no | 0 | 1 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:49 | yes | 23 | 35 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 13:31 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 12:51 | yes | 10 | 42 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 13:17 | yes | 25 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 07:39 | yes | 25 | 49 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 12:43 | no | 0 | 53 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:33 | yes | 2 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:25 | yes | 23 | 36 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:21 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 13:15 | yes | 7 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:39 | yes | 17 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:14 | yes | 19 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:08 | yes | 22 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 12:58 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:10 | yes | 23 | 34 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 12:16 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:04 | no | 0 | 39 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 13:39 | yes | 24 | 37 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:11 | yes | 24 | 39 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:36 | yes | 5 | 17 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 12:47 | yes | 6 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:50 | yes | 11 | 38 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 12:16 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:40 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:43 | yes | 18 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 12:09 | yes | 17 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:12 | yes | 24 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:49 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:12 | yes | 20 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:03 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:19 | yes | 25 | 67 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:02 | yes | 14 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:20 | yes | 14 | 36 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 13:38 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:20 | yes | 2 | 13 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:11 | yes | 15 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:48 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 12:05 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:22 | yes | 12 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:54 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:57 | yes | 12 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 13:30 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:56 | yes | 25 | 36 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:09 | yes | 7 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 13:16 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:45 | yes | 18 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:43 | no | 0 | 49 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:03 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:52 | yes | 4 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:02 | yes | 14 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:28 | yes | 17 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 12:22 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:54 | yes | 12 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:47 | yes | 26 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 07:36 | yes | 23 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:07 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:17 | yes | 25 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 12:27 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 13:06 | yes | 8 | 37 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 13:29 | yes | 25 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:43 | yes | 22 | 96 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:00 | yes | 8 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:16 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 12:51 | yes | 11 | 21 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
ELK Stack (Elasticsearch, Logstash, Kibana) read as Elastic Stack
Elastic read as Elastic Observability
Elastic (ELK) read as Elastic Observability
Elastic Cloud read as Elastic Observability
Grafana Cloud read as Grafana
Grafana Cloud (LGTM Stack) read as Grafana
Grafana Stack read as Grafana
Grafana stack read as Grafana
Unresolved, counted raw
Self-Hosted (Grafana + Prometheus/Loki)
Self-hosted Grafana Loki + Tempo + Mimir + Prometheus
Self-managed Elastic
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.