AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › IT operations and endpoint › Observability › Grafana vs New Relic
Observability platforms · October 2026 Edition

Grafana vs New Relic

Two of fourteen models named Grafana first on the direct prompt; nine named New Relic. Both were named by all fourteen models and Grafana carries 62 labels and New Relic 63, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Grafana

accepted challenger

Named in five categories this edition.

New Relic

accepted challenger

Named in eight categories this edition.

First-choice share27%27%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate8%14%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#2A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels6263A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Grafana reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Datadog was named alongside these two in eight of the fourteen direct answers. Grafana vs Datadog · Grafana vs SigNoz · Grafana vs OpenObserve

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the observability platforms page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
GrafanaFirst choices, of fourteen modelsNew Relic
Direct29
Paraphrase46
Comparative02
Budget-constrained1022 against New Relic
Scale-constrained211 against Grafana
Negative304 against Grafana · 7 against New Relic
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Grafana and New Relic were named in the same answer 214 times, of the 292 answers naming Grafana and the 720 naming New Relic. In those answers New Relic took the first choice twenty-six times and Grafana forty-three.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Grafana and New Relic stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Grafana New Relic first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Grafana on the left and New Relic on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Grafana and New Relic stood in it.

Both were the first choice

2 of 14 modelsThe answer named them together, and the judge labeled each a first choice.
Mistral SmallGrafana, New Relic alternatives: Middleware.io, OpenObserve
Qwen 3.7 FlashGrafana, New Relic

New Relic first, Grafana an alternative

7 of 14 modelsGrafana was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5New Relic alternatives: Atatus, Datadog, Elastic Observability, Grafana, Grafana Labs' LGTM+ stack, Motadata ObserveOps
GPT-5.4 miniNew Relic alternatives: Dynatrace, Grafana
Grok 4.20New Relic alternatives: Datadog, Dynatrace, Grafana Labs
DeepSeek V4 FlashNew Relic alternatives: Elastic Observability, Grafana
Llama 4 MaverickNew Relic alternatives: Datadog, Motadata ObserveOps
Kimi K2New Relic alternatives: Grafana, SigNoz
GLM 4.7 FlashXNew Relic alternatives: Datadog, Grafana + Prometheus, Splunk Observability Cloud

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashHoneycomb alternatives: Grafana, New Relic
GPT-6 LunaDatadog alternatives: Grafana, Honeycomb, New Relic
Muse Glimmer 30BDatadog alternatives: Atatus, Middleware.io, New Relic, OpenObserve, Sematext

Neither was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Perplexity SonarDatadog alternatives: Coralogix, Middleware.io, Motadata ObserveOps, OpenObserve
MiniMax M2.5Datadog, Grafana Labs alternatives: Dynatrace

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Grafana leads by twenty-five points.
Grafana39%#1 of 12
New Relic15%#2 of 12
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Grafana27%#1 of 12
New Relic27%#2 of 12
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: New Relic leads at enterprise.
New Relic12%#3 of 10
Grafana0%#8 of 10
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Grafana

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of six in this category shown.

“Using open-source tools like Prometheus, Grafana, Jaeger, and the ELK ... high Total Cost of Ownership” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“"The Grafana Ghost" vulnerability (CVE-2025-4123) ... Self-hosted instances require diligent patching” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“if you expect "Grafana" to mean one low, flat fee. Cloud usage can be billed across separate meters” GPT-6 Luna · negative prompt · soft negative
“Choose Grafana Cloud if your engineering team has standard microservices/Kubernetes architectures and wants a cost-conscious, highly customizable platform” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For a limited budget, start with open-source platforms like Grafana, OpenObserve, or Zabbix for maximum cost savings and flexibility.” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“the best default choice is usually Grafana Cloud with OpenTelemetry, because it gives you a strong free tier” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about New Relic

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“| New Relic/Datadog | SaaS | Limited free | High ($0.35/GB + users) | Avoid for tight budgets |” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · hard negative
“New Relic Why be cautious: - Complex pricing model” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“New Relic is recommended for teams wanting all telemetry types on a single ingest meter with a genuinely useful free tier” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.