AI Indexes
IT AI Index
October 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › IT operations and endpoint › Logs › Small business › October 2026 Edition

Log management for small business buyers

Asked as “log management platform”, and as “centralized logging tool”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 68 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
32%
Contested · Graylog 13%
32Better Stack13Graylog12Grafana Loki43others

32% of first choices, contested.

Since September 2026▼−2Since September 2026: 34% → 32%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Better Stack held the lead, −2 points on 34%, inside the 11-point floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Better Stack32%2%50endorsed leader▼−2Since September 2026: 34% → 32%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.34% → 32%
02Graylog13%19%48accepted challenger▲+11Since September 2026: 4% → 15%, +11 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 15%
03Grafana Loki12%8%37accepted challenger▼−5Since September 2026: 17% → 12%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.17% → 12%
04Datadog Log Management9%52%66criticized challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 6% → 10%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 10%
05SolarWinds Papertrail7%0%29accepted challenger▼−10Since September 2026: 15% → 5%, −10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.15% → 5%
06New Relic Logs3%17%23accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 0% → 3%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 3%
07Elastic Stack3%50%46criticized challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 0% → 3%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 3%
08Grafana Cloud1%0%12accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
09SigNoz1%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
Show the two products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
11Splunk0%77%44criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
10OpenObserve0%0%16accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Better Stack32%
02Graylog13%
03Grafana Loki12%
04Datadog Log Management9%
05SolarWinds Papertrail7%
06New Relic Logs3%
07Elastic Stack3%
08Grafana Cloud1%
09SigNoz1%
10OpenObserve0%
11Splunk0%

What they warned about

Four of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Splunk
77%
34 of 44 labels negative · 14 of 14 models · 18 hard negative
“Why Avoid:** The implementation often requires a dedicated sales cycle and significant upfront commitment... the price-to-performance ratio is usually poor for a small team.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
Datadog Log Management
52%
34 of 66 labels negative · 14 of 14 models · 12 hard negative
“Datadog's pricing is notoriously complex and expensive, especially for logs... generally overkill for a small business.” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Elastic Stack
50%
23 of 46 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 9 hard negative
“AI analyses warn SMBs against self-hosting due to operational complexity, scaling issues, and hidden costs” Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt
Graylog
19%
9 of 48 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“**Why to avoid**: Can become costly as your needs grow; complexity without proportional value for small operations” MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt

What they cite

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.

Sites the answers cite

74 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1024 links across 173 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 22 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

vendor site · OpenObserve43 answers · 54 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Middleware.io36 answers · 42 citations · 11 models
vendor site · FitGap35 answers · 50 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Better Stack25 answers · 48 citations · 11 models
25 answers · 25 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Cribl24 answers · 33 citations · 11 models
24 answers · 24 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Logmanager23 answers · 29 citations · 12 models
vendor site · G220 answers · 30 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G220 answers · 20 citations · 10 models
19 answers · 24 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Dash019 answers · 23 citations · 9 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best log management platform”, “log management platform”, “log management platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Better Stack betterstack.com32%2851,6001,01741,811119
Grafana Loki grafana.com
Grafana Loki 12%, Grafana Cloud Logs 3%, Grafana Cloud 1%, Grafana Loki via Grafana Cloud's free tier 1%
18%1742,4004084,520116
Graylog graylog.org13%1273,60014612,2693
Datadog parent site
Datadog Log Management 9%
9%17374,0003,541
SolarWinds papertrail.com
SolarWinds Papertrail 7%
7%3514,8001,3968,175
New Relic newrelic.com
New Relic Logs 3%
3%5914,80084383,276 company$41289
Axiom axiom.co3%19165,0007,92119,1287
Loggly loggly.com3%9480510,55916
Better Stack Logs3%
Elastic elastic.co
Elastic Stack 3%
3%13574,00034,672208,306 company1058

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 13 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (cribl.io, dash0.com, openobserve.ai). The first result for “best log management platform” is reddit.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best log management platform for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which centralized logging tool would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top log management platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best log management platform for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a log management platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which log management platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceagainst: Datadog Log Management, SplunkDatadog Log Management, Grafana LokiChanged
One alternativeNew Relic Logs
against: Elastic Stack, Splunk
Better Stack
Four alternativesGraylog, New Relic Logs, OpenObserve, SolarWinds Papertrail
Better Stack, Sematext
Two alternativesNew Relic Logs, SolarWinds Papertrail
against: Graylog
no first choiceagainst: Amazon CloudWatch Logs, Datadog Log Management, Dynatrace, Splunk
GPT-5.4 miniGrafana Cloud Logs
One alternativeLoggly
against: Splunk
GraylogChanged
One alternativeDatadog Log Management
Datadog Log Management
Four alternativesElastic Observability, Elastic Stack, Google Cloud Observability / Cloud Logging, Grafana Loki
against: Elastic Stack
Grafana Loki via Grafana Cloud's free tier
Two alternativesSelf-hosted Loki, Sematext
no first choiceagainst: Datadog Log Management, New Relic Logs, Splunk
Gemini 3.5 FlashBetter Stack
Three alternativesAxiom, Grafana Cloud, Sentry
against: Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Splunk
Better StackHeld
Two alternativesGrafana Cloud Logs, OpenObserve
against: Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Splunk
Better Stack
Five alternativesAxiom, Grafana Loki, New Relic Logs, OpenObserve, Parseable
against: Elastic Stack
Axiom, New Relic Logs
Five alternativesBetter Stack, Grafana Cloud, Grafana Loki, OpenObserve, Parseable
against: Elastic Stack, Splunk
Axiom, Better Stack
Three alternativesNew Relic Logs, OpenObserve, SigNoz
against: Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, OpenSearch
against: Datadog Log Management, Dynatrace, Elastic Stack, Grafana Loki, New Relic Logs, Self-hosted Graylog, Splunk
Perplexity SonarBetter Stack
Three alternativesCoralogix, Sematext, SolarWinds Papertrail
against: Graylog
Grafana LokiChanged
Four alternativesCISA Logging Made Easy, Graylog, Loggly, SolarWinds Papertrail
against: Datadog Log Management
Better Stack, SolarWinds Papertrail
Two alternativesLogmanager, New Relic Logs
against: Datadog Log Management
Better Stack
Two alternativesGrafana Loki, Graylog
no first choiceagainst: Datadog Log Management, Graylog, SolarWinds, Splunk, self-hosted Elastic (ELK) / OpenSearch
Grok 4.1 FastDatadog Log Management
Four alternativesElastic Stack, Grafana Loki, Graylog, New Relic Logs
against: Splunk
SolarWinds PapertrailChanged
Four alternativesBetter Stack, Graylog, ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer, Sematext Logs
Better Stack, Grafana Loki
Four alternativesDatadog Log Management, Graylog, ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer, SigNoz
Graylog
Four alternativesBetter Stack, Elastic Stack, Grafana Cloud, Grafana Loki
against: Datadog Log Management, New Relic Logs
Datadog Log Management
Three alternativesGrafana Loki, OpenObserve, Sumo Logic
against: Elastic Stack, Splunk
against: Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Graylog, OpenSearch, SolarWinds, Splunk
Mistral SmallGraylog
Three alternativesCoralogix, Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack
Better StackChanged
One alternativeGraylog
Better Stack
Five alternativesElastic Stack, Grafana Loki, Logmanager, New Relic Logs, SolarWinds Papertrail
Grafana Loki, Graylog
One alternativeElastic Stack
no first choiceagainst: Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Graylog, OpenSearch, SolarWinds, Splunk
DeepSeek V4 FlashBetter Stack
Two alternativesGrafana Loki, SigNoz
against: Datadog Log Management, Graylog, Splunk
Better StackHeld
One alternativeGraylog
Axiom, Better Stack, SigNoz
Two alternativesGrafana Loki, SolarWinds Papertrail
against: Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack
Grafana Loki, SolarWinds Papertrail
Three alternativesBetter Stack, OpenObserve, SigNoz
against: Datadog Log Management, Splunk, Sumo Logic
Better Stack, Grafana Loki, SigNoz
One alternativeDatadog Log Management
against: Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Splunk, Sumo Logic
Llama 4 MaverickGraylog
Three alternativesCoralogix, Datadog Log Management, OpenObserve
Better StackChangedno first choiceDatadog Log Management
Two alternativesMotadata ObserveOps, OpenObserve
no first choiceagainst: Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Graylog, SolarWinds, Splunk
Qwen 3.7 FlashBetter Stack
Two alternativesGraylog, SolarWinds Papertrail
against: Datadog Log Management
Better StackHeld
One alternativeMezmo
against: Datadog Log Management, Grafana Loki
Datadog Log Management, SolarWinds Papertrail
Two alternativesBetter Stack, Graylog
Better Stack
Three alternativesOpenObserve, Sematext, SolarWinds Papertrail
against: Datadog Log Management
Better Stack, Honeycomb, Sentry
Two alternativesDatadog Log Management, New Relic Logs
against: Elastic Stack, Grafana Loki, Graylog
against: Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Splunk
Kimi K2Better Stack Logs, Graylog
Two alternativesDatadog Log Management, SolarWinds Papertrail
Better StackChanged
One alternativeGrafana Loki
against: Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Splunk
Better Stack
Five alternativesGrafana Loki, Graylog, Logz.io, Sematext, SolarWinds Papertrail
against: Datadog Log Management, Splunk
Grafana Loki
Three alternativesGrafana Cloud, Graylog, Sematext
against: Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Splunk
Better Stack, SolarWinds Papertrail
Two alternativesDatadog Log Management, New Relic Logs
against: Elastic Stack
against: Datadog Log Management, Dynatrace, Elastic Stack, New Relic Logs, Splunk, Sumo Logic
GLM 4.7 FlashXBetter Stack, Loggly
Two alternativesGrafana Loki, Graylog
against: Datadog Log Management
GraylogChanged
Two alternativesElastic Stack, OpenSearch
against: Datadog Log Management, Splunk
Better Stack, SolarWinds Papertrail
Five alternativesAxiom, Coralogix, Datadog Log Management, Grafana Cloud Loki, Logz.io
against: Splunk
Grafana Loki
Three alternativesDash0, Elastic Stack, Graylog
Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, New Relic Logsagainst: Splunkagainst: Datadog Log Management, Splunk
MiniMax M2.5Graylog
One alternativeLogmanager
against: Splunk
GraylogHeld
Four alternativesElastic Stack, Grafana Loki, Loggly, Sumo Logic
Better Stack, Grafana Cloud
Three alternativesGraylog, Logmanager, SolarWinds Papertrail
against: Splunk
Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Loggly
Two alternativesGrafana Loki, Graylog
Better Stack, Grafana Cloud
Three alternativesDatadog Log Management, Grafana Loki, SigNoz
against: Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Graylog, OpenSearch, SolarWinds, Splunk
GPT-6 LunaBetter Stack
One alternativeGrafana Cloud
against: Datadog Log Management
Better Stack LogsChanged
Two alternativesDatadog Log Management, Grafana Cloud
Better Stack
Three alternativesDatadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Grafana Cloud
Grafana Cloud Logs
One alternativeBetter Stack
no first choice
Three alternativesBetter Stack, Datadog Log Management, Grafana Cloud
against: Better Stack, Datadog Log Management, Google Cloud Logging, Self-managed Elastic/ELK, Splunk
Muse Glimmer 30BBetter Stack, SolarWinds Papertrail
Two alternativesElastic Stack, Graylog
against: Datadog Log Management
Better StackChanged
Two alternativesGrafana Loki, Graylog
against: Elastic Stack, Splunk
Better Stack, SolarWinds Papertrail
Three alternativesDatadog Log Management, Graylog, OpenObserve
against: Elastic Stack, Splunk
Grafana Loki, SolarWinds Papertrail
Four alternativesBetter Stack, Graylog, OpenObserve, SigNoz
no first choiceagainst: Datadog Log Management, Self-managed Elastic Stack / ELK, Splunk
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 08:01no04 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 12:28yes33 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 13:19yes1322 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 11:07yes183 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 11:03yes2015 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 12:33yes95 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 12:20yes2117 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 10:07yes52 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 12:34yes924 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 08:27yes1320 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 12:31yes24190 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 12:58yes521 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 13:37yes39 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 12:23yes1518 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 12:09no04 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 09:33yes44 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 12:47yes2224 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 10:09yes194 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 07:40yes256 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 09:18yes53 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 09:57yes2222 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 11:58yes51 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 10:20no026 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 09:22yes1922 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 08:19yes2494 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 13:34no059 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 12:40yes38 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 08:44yes1419 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 10:49yes99 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 10:29yes79 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 11:29yes2327 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 07:28yes195 s
ComparativeGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 12:47yes2212 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 08:24yes129 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 11:23yes2444 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 13:46yes51 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 12:52yes1035 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 11:12yes1930 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 07:38yes13105 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 09:46yes2243 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 13:03yes418 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 10:55yes1330 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 08:31yes98 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 10:04yes47 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 13:12yes2526 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 12:13yes225 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 08:26yes206 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 10:28yes106 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 11:06yes2323 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 10:59yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 07:58yes821 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 08:29yes1525 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 13:16yes2276 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 11:54no07 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 13:45yes311 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 10:45yes1217 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 08:30no07 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 12:16no06 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 10:05yes936 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 13:02yes185 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 08:52yes189 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 11:39no07 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 09:56yes1628 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 09:15yes52 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 12:09no031 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 11:01yes1415 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 09:44yes8261 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 11:46yes516 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 11:14yes416 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 13:18no04 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 09:46yes189 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 10:02yes35 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 07:27yes1224 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 11:21yes205 s
Negative framingGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 09:08yes246 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 08:42yes54 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 09:37yes2445 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 11:45yes52 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 07:42yes2544 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 10:35yes2534 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 13:15yes23167 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 11:07yes1439 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 10:39yes517 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 10:57yes2441 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Cribl read as Cribl Stream
Datadog read as Datadog Log Management
ELK read as Elastic Stack
ELK (Elasticsearch/Logstash/Kibana) read as Elastic Stack
ELK Stack read as Elastic Stack
ELK Stack (Elastic) read as Elastic Stack
ELK Stack (Elasticsearch + Logstash + Kibana) read as Elastic Stack
ELK Stack (Elasticsearch, Logstash, Kibana) read as Elastic Stack
Elastic read as Elastic Stack
Elastic (ELK Stack) read as Elastic Stack
Elastic Cloud read as Elastic Stack
Elasticsearch read as Elastic Stack
Elasticsearch (Self-Managed) read as Elastic Stack
Motadata read as Motadata ObserveOps
New Relic read as New Relic Logs
The ELK Stack read as Elastic Stack
Unresolved, counted raw
CISA Logging Made Easy
CISA's Logging Made Easy
Elastic Serverless
Google Cloud Observability / Cloud Logging
Grafana Cloud Loki
Grafana Loki via Grafana Cloud's free tier
Logentries
Self-hosted Graylog
Self-hosted Loki
Self-managed Elastic Stack / ELK
Self-managed Elastic/ELK
Sematext Logs
self-hosted Elastic (ELK) / OpenSearch
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← ITSMM365 management →