| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data center networking | Network and edge | 7% | 2 of 165 | 0% | 9 | under 10 labels · led by Arista Networks at 27% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“managed by a solution like Arista CloudVision or Juniper Apstra” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Data center networking · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“with Juniper Apstra + EVPN-VXLAN as the strongest default choice” Perplexity Sonar · Data center networking · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation: Juniper Apstra (with Juniper/HPE switches)” Kimi K2 · Data center networking · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“If you have a mixed-vendor environment, Juniper Apstra is the abstraction layer of choice.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Data center networking · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 26 of the 30 answers that named Juniper Apstra and are not a share of its labels.
Eighty of the ninety-four domain citations in answers naming Juniper Apstra came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Juniper Apstra's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: community.juniper.net/discussion/juniper-apstra, community.juniper.net/discussion/juniper-apstra-2, community.juniper.net/discussion/juniper-apstra-1, juniper.net/us/en/dm/apstras-demo-time-voyagers.html, juniper.net/nl/nl/dm/juniper-apstra-vs-cisco-data-center-solutions.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Juniper Apstra's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Juniper Apstra, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Juniper Apstra by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
Juniper Apstra is among the products AI models recommend first in Data center networking this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.