| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data center networking | Network and edge | 0% | 165 of 165 | 58% | 12 | criticized challenger | |
| Microsegmentation | Network and edge | 0% | 78 of 94 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by ColorTokens Xshield at 25% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you need an enterprise-grade, policy-driven SDN with strong security, Cisco ACI is the benchmark.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Data center networking · comparative prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“What I'd Avoid: | Cisco ACI | Overly complex and expensive for mid-sized environments” Kimi K2 · Data center networking · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Do not buy highly complex SDN platforms (like Cisco ACI) unless you have a dedicated team” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Data center networking · negative prompt · hard negative
“ACI described as "a waste of time and money" by some practitioners” Kimi K2 · Data center networking · negative prompt · hard negative
“often criticized for its significant complexity and high cost... The learning curve and licensing costs can be substantial” Mistral Small · Data center networking · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 39 of the 47 answers that named Cisco ACI and are not a share of its labels.
122 of the 144 domain citations in answers naming Cisco ACI came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Cisco ACI's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: talentbridge.cisco.com/organization/cisco, talentbridge.cisco.com/job/cisco-sd-wan-engineer-56524, talentbridge.cisco.com/job/cisco-uc-voice-engineer-56561, talentbridge.cisco.com/job/customer-success-specialist-cisco-54109, talentbridge.cisco.com/job/strategic-brand-manager-dwm-cisco-54033. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Cisco ACI's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Cisco ACI, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Cisco ACI by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: