Two of fourteen models named Arista Networks first on the direct prompt; one named HPE Aruba. Arista Networks was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and HPE Aruba by eight and Arista Networks carries 45 labels and HPE Aruba 12, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the data center networking page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Arista Networks and HPE Aruba were named in the same answer eighteen times, of the 114 answers naming Arista Networks and the 29 naming HPE Aruba. In those answers HPE Aruba took the first choice zero times and Arista Networks eight.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | HA | |||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | HA | |||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | HA | |||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Cisco ACI, Nexus 9000 with extensive features enabled, or overly rich SD‑N stacks can introduce configuration‑driven bugs if not fully tested.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“Cons: Premium cost; overkill for basic mid-market unless high-speed uplinks needed.” Grok 4.1 Fast · direct prompt · soft negative
“one-half to one-third what a comparable Cisco Catalyst or Arista switch runs” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · soft negative
“Arista EOS + CloudVision Portal for a greenfield or data-center-focused shop: mature EVPN/VXLAN, CLI familiar, CloudVision management/telemetry overlay, and lower operational overhead” Muse Glimmer 30B · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Arista is positioned as AI-first with ultra-low-latency AI/ML fabrics, hyperscaler pedigree... AI training clusters favor Arista's buffering and EOS” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
“platforms from Arista (CloudVision), Juniper (Apstra), or Cisco (with careful evaluation) are considered more mature and widely supported” Mistral Small · negative prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.
“HPE Aruba is presented as more budget-friendly, though the result emphasizes campus/edge more than data center.” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · soft negative
“HPE Aruba (AOS-CX) and Cisco (Catalyst 9000/Nexus) are generally considered the top two contenders” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Good for integrated campus+DC, competitive pricing | Less established in pure data center switching use cases” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · alternative
“If you need campus + data center: Consider Aruba for campus and Arista for data center” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.