Source control hosting
Asked as “source control hosting platform”, and as “Git hosting service”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 53 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
70%
Clear leader
70GitHub21GitLab04Bitbucket06others
70% of first choices, clear leader.
Since September 2026▼−7Since September 2026: 74% → 67%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.GitHub held the lead, −7 points on 74%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
GitHub72%Clear leader▼−8Since September 2026: 78% → 71%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-marketGitHub70%Clear leader▼−7Since September 2026: 74% → 67%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageEnterpriseGitHub54%Clear leader▼−7Since September 2026: 56% → 49%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →
GitHub72%Clear leader▼−8Since September 2026: 78% → 71%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-marketGitHub70%Clear leader▼−7Since September 2026: 74% → 67%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageEnterpriseGitHub54%Clear leader▼−7Since September 2026: 56% → 49%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01GitHub70%16%83endorsed leader▼−7Since September 2026: 74% → 67%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.74% → 67%
GitHub70%16%83endorsed leader▼−7Since September 2026: 74% → 67%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.74% → 67%02
GitLab21%14%81accepted challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 19% → 24%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.19% → 24%
GitLab21%14%81accepted challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 19% → 24%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.19% → 24%03
Bitbucket4%26%76criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 4%
Bitbucket4%26%76criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 4%04
Gitea2%15%27accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
Gitea2%15%27accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%05
Azure Repos2%0%16accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Azure Repos2%0%16accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%06
Azure DevOps2%27%30criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Azure DevOps2%27%30criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
10
SourceForge0%90%10criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
SourceForge0%90%10criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%09
AWS CodeCommit0%40%15criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
AWS CodeCommit0%40%15criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%08
Codeberg0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Codeberg0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%07
Forgejo0%5%19accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Forgejo0%5%19accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All fifteen head-to-head pages: the top six products, each against each
One product takes 70% of first choices here, so the chart would put nine markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. Four products carry a negative rate above 25% in this category.
What they warned about
Seven of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
GitHub16%
13 of 83 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“GitHub - due to controversies” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt
Bitbucket26%
20 of 76 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“*Atlassian ended support for Bitbucket Server in February 2024*” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
SourceForge90%
9 of 10 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“**SourceForge**: Universally panned in developer surveys and AI recommendations (89% negative labels across models).” Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt
GitLab14%
11 of 81 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“GitLab SaaS - not budget-friendly for small, scaling teams” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
73 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1052 links across 295 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 70 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · G230 answers · 62 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Guideflow25 answers · 25 citations · 10 models
24 answers · 34 citations · 10 models
22 answers · 22 citations · 10 models
vendor site · FitGap20 answers · 24 citations · 10 models
vendor site · GitLab19 answers · 29 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Bitbucket18 answers · 33 citations · 8 models
vendor site · GitHub18 answers · 28 citations · 9 models
vendor site · ZipDo.co18 answers · 21 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Gitnux16 answers · 18 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Graphite16 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
14 answers · 15 citations · 10 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
25 answers · 10 models
22 answers · 10 models
18 answers · 10 models
14 answers · 7 models
14 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 8 models
12 answers · 7 models
11 answers · 5 models
11 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best source control hosting platform”, “source control hosting platform”, “source control hosting platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GitHub github.com | 70% | 237 | 1,500,000 | 31,479 | 42,019,137 | $81 | 14 | |
| GitLab gitlab.com | 21% | 218 | 90,500 | 4,844 | 603,028 | $884 | 66 | 4 |
| Bitbucket bitbucket.org | 4% | 195 | 33,100 | 1,560 | 22,601 | |||
| Azure parent site Azure Repos 2%, Azure DevOps 2% | 4% | 138 | 301,000 | 47,904 | ||||
| Gitea gitea.com Gitea 2%, Gitea/Forgejo 0% | 2% | 61 | 9,900 | 193 | 7,814 | |||
| Forgejo forgejo.org | 0% | 34 | 5,400 | 55 | 2,987 | 4 | ||
| Codeberg codeberg.org | 0% | 19 | 8,100 | 33 | 32,214 | |||
| SourceHut | 0% | 590 | 4 | |||||
| Gitbucket | 0% | |||||||
| Self-Hosted GitLab CE | 0% |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 13 sites; 1 of them are among the sites the models cited here (about.gitlab.com). The first result for “best source control hosting platform” is reddit.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best source control hosting platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which Git hosting service would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top source control hosting platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best source control hosting platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a source control hosting platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which source control hosting platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5GitHubGitHubHeldno first choiceGitHub, GitLabno first choiceagainst: Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, Codeberg, GitHub, SourceForge
Two alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLabTwo alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLabTwo alternatives
Forgejo, GiteaGPT-5.4 miniGitHubGitHubHeldGitHubGitHubno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, GitLabTwo alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLabThree alternatives
Azure Repos, Bitbucket, GitLabFour alternatives
Bitbucket, Forgejo, GitLab, GiteaGemini 3.5 FlashGitHubagainst: Azure DevOps, BitbucketGitHubHeldGitHubGitHubagainst: Bitbucket, GitLabGitHub, GitLabagainst: Bitbucketagainst: AWS CodeCommit, Bitbucket, GitHub, GitLab, Gitee, Keybase Git, Phabricator
One alternative
GitLabTwo alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLabSix alternatives
AWS CodeCommit, Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, Forgejo, GitLab, GiteaThree alternatives
Azure DevOps, Forgejo, GiteaOne alternative
Azure DevOpsPerplexity SonarGitHubGitLabChangedno first choiceGitHubno first choiceagainst: AWS CodeCommit, Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, GitHub, GitLab, SourceForge
Two alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLabThree alternatives
Azure Repos, Bitbucket, GitHubTwo alternatives
AWS CodeCommit, PhabricatorGrok 4.1 FastBitbucket, GitHubGitHubChangedGitHubGitHubagainst: Azure DevOpsGitHub, GitLabagainst: Gitea, RhodeCodeagainst: Bitbucket, GitHub, GitLab, SourceForge
One alternative
GitLabTwo alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLabTwo alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLabTwo alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLabTwo alternatives
Azure Repos, BitbucketMistral SmallGitHubGitHub, GitLabChangedGitHubGitHub, GitLabno first choiceagainst: Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, Codegiant, GitHub, GitLab, Gitea, SourceForge
Two alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLabOne alternative
Azure ReposThree alternatives
Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, GitLabTwo alternatives
Azure Repos, BitbucketDeepSeek V4 FlashGitHubGitLabChangedGitHubGitHubagainst: BitbucketGitHubagainst: Bitbucket, GitHub, GitLab, SourceForge
Two alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLabThree alternatives
Azure Repos, Bitbucket, GitHubFive alternatives
Azure DevOps, Azure Repos, Bitbucket, GitLab, Gitea/ForgejoTwo alternatives
GitLab, GiteaTwo alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLabLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldno first choiceGitLabno first choiceagainst: Bitbucket, GitHub, GitLab, SourceForge
Two alternatives
AWS CodeCommit, GitHubQwen 3.7 FlashGitHubGitLabChangedGitHub, GitLabGitHubno first choiceagainst: AWS CodeCommit, Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, GitHub, GitLab, SourceForge
Two alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLabTwo alternatives
Bitbucket, GitHubTwo alternatives
Azure DevOps, BitbucketThree alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLab, GiteaKimi K2GitHubagainst: BitbucketGitHubHeldagainst: BitbucketGitHubagainst: AWS CodeCommitAzure DevOps, GitHubno first choiceagainst: Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, Forgejo, GitHub, GitLab, Gitea, Gogs, Google Code, Microsoft CodePlex, RubyForge, SourceForge
One alternative
GitLabOne alternative
GitLabThree alternatives
Azure Repos, Bitbucket, GitLabThree alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLab, GiteaGLM 4.7 FlashXGitHubBitbucketChangedGitHubGiteaagainst: GitLabGitHub, GitLabagainst: Gitea/Forgejoagainst: Bitbucket, GitHub, GitLab, Gitea, SourceForge
Two alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLabTwo alternatives
GitHub, GitLabSix alternatives
Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, Codeberg, GitLab, Gitea, SourceHutThree alternatives
Bitbucket, Codeberg, GitHubOne alternative
BitbucketMiniMax M2.5GitHub, GitLabno first choiceChangedGitHubGitHubno first choiceagainst: AWS CodeCommit, Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, GitHub
Two alternatives
Azure DevOps, BitbucketThree alternatives
Bitbucket, GitHub, GitLabTwo alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLabTwo alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLabGPT-6 LunaGitHubGitHubHeldno first choiceGitHubno first choiceagainst: AWS CodeCommit, GitHub, Google Cloud Source Repositories, JetBrains Space
Two alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLabTwo alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLabTwo alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLabMuse Glimmer 30BGitHubGitHubHeldGitHubAzure Repos, GitHubagainst: Bitbucketno first choiceagainst: Amazon CodeCatalyst, Bitbucket, GitHub, Google Cloud Source Repositories, JetBrains Space, Perforce TeamHub, Phabricator
Three alternatives
Azure DevOps, Azure Repos, GitLabOne alternative
GitLabFour alternatives
Azure DevOps, Azure Repos, Bitbucket, GitLabTwo alternatives
GitLab, GiteaBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:35 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:56 | yes | 4 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:06 | yes | 11 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 07:49 | yes | 26 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:53 | yes | 24 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 13:07 | yes | 9 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:44 | yes | 20 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:22 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 07:26 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 12:15 | yes | 25 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 12:58 | yes | 25 | 111 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 12:53 | yes | 10 | 35 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:12 | yes | 3 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:43 | yes | 13 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:22 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 13:38 | yes | 4 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:17 | yes | 14 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:16 | yes | 17 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 07:39 | yes | 14 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:48 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:39 | yes | 24 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 13:27 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:26 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 13:37 | no | 0 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:01 | yes | 19 | 68 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:34 | yes | 5 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:15 | yes | 3 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 07:38 | yes | 15 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:28 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 12:59 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:35 | yes | 9 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:40 | yes | 16 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:43 | yes | 23 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:09 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:18 | yes | 25 | 46 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:40 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:59 | yes | 15 | 53 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:15 | yes | 15 | 29 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:27 | yes | 19 | 36 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:00 | yes | 10 | 13 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:07 | yes | 5 | 21 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:07 | yes | 15 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:12 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 13:30 | no | 0 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 12:57 | yes | 24 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 12:06 | yes | 15 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 12:12 | yes | 25 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 12:43 | yes | 14 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:40 | yes | 25 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 13:53 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:50 | yes | 10 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:37 | yes | 20 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:59 | yes | 20 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:40 | yes | 15 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 13:41 | yes | 4 | 14 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 12:50 | yes | 13 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:38 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:44 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:03 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 12:20 | yes | 15 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:42 | yes | 15 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:24 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:50 | yes | 23 | 35 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:55 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 12:08 | yes | 5 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 12:43 | yes | 25 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 12:54 | yes | 25 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:11 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:39 | yes | 7 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:01 | yes | 13 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:29 | yes | 18 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:08 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:23 | yes | 18 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:49 | yes | 32 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 12:18 | yes | 24 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 13:01 | yes | 10 | 16 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:08 | yes | 25 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:39 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 13:30 | yes | 20 | 71 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:12 | yes | 25 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 12:25 | yes | 17 | 12 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:38 | yes | 24 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:57 | yes | 4 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 07:53 | yes | 12 | 33 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
GitHub Enterprise Server read as GitHub
GitLab SaaS read as GitLab
GitLab Self-Managed read as GitLab
GitLab Ultimate read as GitLab
Unresolved, counted raw
Codegiant
Keybase Git
Microsoft CodePlex
MilesWeb
Perforce TeamHub
Phorge
RubyForge
Self-Hosted GitLab CE
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.