AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Developer platform › Source control › GitHub vs Gitea
Source control hosting · October 2026 Edition

GitHub vs Gitea

Thirteen of fourteen models named GitHub first on the direct prompt; zero named Gitea. GitHub was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Gitea by thirteen and GitHub carries 83 labels and Gitea 27, so the shares are not directly comparable.

GitHub

endorsed leader

Named in five categories this edition.

Gitea

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share70%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate16%15%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#4A position in a field of 10; printed, not drawn.
Labels8327A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, GitHub reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.GitLab was named alongside these two in thirteen of the fourteen direct answers. GitHub vs GitLab · GitHub vs Bitbucket · GitHub vs Azure Repos

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the source control hosting page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
GitHubFirst choices, of fourteen modelsGitea
Direct130
Paraphrase80
Comparative100
Budget-constrained121
Scale-constrained401 against Gitea
Negative0213 against GitHub · 3 against Gitea
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, GitHub and Gitea were named in the same answer seventy-one times, of the 270 answers naming GitHub and the 72 naming Gitea. In those answers Gitea took the first choice five times and GitHub forty-one.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where GitHub and Gitea stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
GitHub Gitea first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, GitHub on the left and Gitea on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where GitHub and Gitea stood in it.

GitHub first, Gitea not the choice

13 of 14 modelsGitea was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5GitHub alternatives: Bitbucket, GitLab
GPT-5.4 miniGitHub alternatives: Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, GitLab
Gemini 3.5 FlashGitHub alternatives: GitLab
Perplexity SonarGitHub alternatives: Bitbucket, GitLab
Grok 4.1 FastBitbucket, GitHub alternatives: GitLab
Mistral SmallGitHub alternatives: Bitbucket, GitLab
DeepSeek V4 FlashGitHub alternatives: Bitbucket, GitLab
Qwen 3.7 FlashGitHub alternatives: Bitbucket, GitLab
Kimi K2GitHub alternatives: GitLab
GLM 4.7 FlashXGitHub alternatives: Bitbucket, GitLab
MiniMax M2.5GitHub, GitLab alternatives: Azure DevOps, Bitbucket
GPT-6 LunaGitHub alternatives: Bitbucket, GitLab
Muse Glimmer 30BGitHub alternatives: Azure DevOps, Azure Repos, GitLab

Neither was named

1 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
GitHub leads by seventy-two points.
GitHub72%#1 of 7
Gitea0%#4 of 7
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
GitHub leads by sixty-eight points.
GitHub70%#1 of 10
Gitea2%#4 of 10
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
GitHub leads by fifty-four points.
GitHub54%#1 of 8
Gitea0%#8 of 8
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about GitHub

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“GitHub - due to controversies” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · hard negative
“have all experienced security breaches, credential leaks, and supply chain attacks in recent years... require careful configuration and security practices to mitigate risks” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“GitHub, especially if you need enterprise self-hosting: In May 2026, GitHub disclosed a compromise... it isn't by itself a reason to avoid GitHub.com.” GPT-6 Luna · negative prompt · soft negative
“The most popular and commonly used cloud-based Git platform with a user-friendly and intuitive UI and is widely regarded as the go-to platform for collaborative software development.” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with a pilot of GitHub Enterprise Server or GitLab Self-Managed, as both offer the best balance of enterprise features and developer experience” GLM 4.7 FlashX · scale prompt · first choice
“GitHub Enterprise | Best-in-class developer experience, massive open-source ecosystem, superior AI (Copilot), industry standard for talent.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice

What the models said about Gitea

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“"For a fresh install in May 2026, I would not pick Gitea"” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“Self-Hosted Gitea / Forgejo ... these have had significant security issues” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Smaller platforms can be riskier due to less mature security practices” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“For a company on a tight budget, the best all‑around choice is Gitea (self‑hosted).” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“Prioritize self-hosted/open options like Forgejo, Gitea, or Codeberg for privacy” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · first choice
“self-hosted open-source options such as Forgejo or Gitea” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.