AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Developer platform › Source control › Bitbucket vs Gitea
Source control hosting · October 2026 Edition

Bitbucket vs Gitea

One of fourteen models named Bitbucket first on the direct prompt; zero named Gitea. Bitbucket was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Gitea by thirteen and Bitbucket carries 76 labels and Gitea 27, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Bitbucket

criticized challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

Gitea

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share4%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate26%15%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#4A position in a field of 10; printed, not drawn.
Labels7627A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Bitbucket reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.GitLab was named alongside these two in thirteen of the fourteen direct answers. GitHub vs Bitbucket · GitHub vs Gitea · GitLab vs Bitbucket

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the source control hosting page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
BitbucketFirst choices, of fourteen modelsGitea
Direct102 against Bitbucket
Paraphrase101 against Bitbucket
Comparative00
Budget-constrained013 against Bitbucket
Scale-constrained001 against Bitbucket · 1 against Gitea
Negative0212 against Bitbucket · 3 against Gitea
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Bitbucket and Gitea were named in the same answer sixty-one times, of the 222 answers naming Bitbucket and the 72 naming Gitea. In those answers Gitea took the first choice five times and Bitbucket one.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Bitbucket and Gitea stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Bitbucket Gitea first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Bitbucket on the left and Gitea on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Bitbucket and Gitea stood in it.

Bitbucket first, Gitea not the choice

1 of 14 modelsGitea was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Grok 4.1 FastBitbucket, GitHub alternatives: GitLab

Neither was the first choice, one was named

9 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5GitHub alternatives: Bitbucket, GitLab
GPT-5.4 miniGitHub alternatives: Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, GitLab
Perplexity SonarGitHub alternatives: Bitbucket, GitLab
Mistral SmallGitHub alternatives: Bitbucket, GitLab
DeepSeek V4 FlashGitHub alternatives: Bitbucket, GitLab
Qwen 3.7 FlashGitHub alternatives: Bitbucket, GitLab
GLM 4.7 FlashXGitHub alternatives: Bitbucket, GitLab
MiniMax M2.5GitHub, GitLab alternatives: Azure DevOps, Bitbucket
GPT-6 LunaGitHub alternatives: Bitbucket, GitLab

Neither was named

4 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Gemini 3.5 FlashGitHub alternatives: GitLab
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Kimi K2GitHub alternatives: GitLab
Muse Glimmer 30BGitHub alternatives: Azure DevOps, Azure Repos, GitLab

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Bitbucket leads by twelve points.
Bitbucket12%#3 of 7
Gitea0%#4 of 7
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Bitbucket leads by two points.
Bitbucket4%#3 of 10
Gitea2%#4 of 10
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Bitbucket leads by four points.
Bitbucket4%#3 of 8
Gitea0%#8 of 8
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Bitbucket

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“*Atlassian ended support for Bitbucket Server in February 2024*” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · hard negative
“Bitbucket - had major impact incidents and high-severity flaws” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · hard negative
“One-third of Bitbucket incidents had major impact” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“If using Jira/Confluence (common in B2B): Bitbucket—seamless integration cuts context-switching; 3x cheaper than competitors” Grok 4.1 Fast · direct prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation: Bitbucket” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Best For: Mid-to-large businesses that already run their entire planning, PM, and documentation cycles on Jira and Confluence.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · alternative

What the models said about Gitea

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“"For a fresh install in May 2026, I would not pick Gitea"” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“Self-Hosted Gitea / Forgejo ... these have had significant security issues” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Smaller platforms can be riskier due to less mature security practices” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“For a company on a tight budget, the best all‑around choice is Gitea (self‑hosted).” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“Prioritize self-hosted/open options like Forgejo, Gitea, or Codeberg for privacy” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · first choice
“self-hosted open-source options such as Forgejo or Gitea” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.