Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 7 → 10 of 20
1 category · Named, not rankedGitea/Forgejo
8Judge labels
0First choices
4Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Gitea/Forgejo was named 2 times in Source control, where GitHub led with 70%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business9 of 22
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market18 of 33
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise38 of 42
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
In source control · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Gitea/Forgejo for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Source control hosting | Developer platform | 0% | 18 of 33 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by GitHub at 70% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Gitea/Forgejo held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Source control · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 10 → 19 of 29
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 11 → 32 of 36
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Source control | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 10 → 18 of 33 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Gitea/Forgejo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Gitea/Forgejo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best for: Small teams, internal company tooling, and organizations that want complete control” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Source control · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Cons: Limited enterprise features, requires more management - Best for: Budget-conscious teams with strong DevOps capabilities” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Source control · scale prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Gitea/Forgejo, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Gitea/Forgejo was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Gitea/Forgejo, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Gitea/Forgejo was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Gitea/Forgejo. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 8 answers that named Gitea/Forgejo and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
guptadeepak.com5
note.com5
dev.to4
g2.com4
github.com4
us.fitgap.com4
atlassian.com3
bitbucket.org3
docs.github.com3
gitnux.org3
Thirty-eight of the thirty-eight domain citations in answers naming Gitea/Forgejo came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
gitea.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Gitea/Forgejo takes 0% of first choices and GitHub takes 70%.ShowHide
Search and answers
gitea.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Gitea/Forgejo takes 0% of first choices and GitHub takes 70%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “source control hosting platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “source control hosting platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- not counted (“gitea/forgejo”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 10 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 7,814 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 3,491 · 142 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 26,620
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 18 of 33 in source control
Segment leader
70%
GitHub
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 8 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 8 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on gitea.com
53
subdomains included
Content
41
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 36 | 4 | 2026-08-29 | ||
| News or press | 5 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-08-29Release of 1.27.3 blog
- 2026-08-14Release of 1.27.2 blog
- 2026-07-27Release of 1.27.1 blog
- 2026-07-12Release of 1.27.0 blog
- 2026-01-22Release of 1.25.4 blog
- 2025-12-18Release of 1.25.3 blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page gitea.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Gitea/Forgejo
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Gitea/Forgejo; a claim can dispute any of them.
Gitea / Forgejo 1
Follow Gitea/Forgejo
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Gitea/Forgejo is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Gitea/Forgejo is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Private, Fast, Reliable DevOps Platform
- For
- teams and developers
- Price stated
- Free; $9.5$19*/user/month gitea.com
- Starting price
- Free gitea.com
- Free plan or trial
- Start your 30-day free trial gitea.com
- Integrations claimed
- 20000 gitea.com
- Not stated on the pages read
- Certifications, hosting, customers
What Gitea/Forgejo's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: gitea.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Gitea/Forgejo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Gitea/Forgejo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Gitea/Forgejo by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Gitea/Forgejo is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Gitea/Forgejo, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.