1 category · RankedBitbucket
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Source control hosting | Developer platform | 4% | 3 of 23 | 17% | 69 | accepted challenger |
Movement
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If your team is small (under 5 people), Bitbucket is a strong choice due to its integration with Jira and free private repos.” Mistral Small · Source control · budget prompt · first choice
“Bitbucket Cloud is often the sweet spot: it's the cheapest per-user, has a generous free tier for up to 5 users” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Source control · budget prompt · first choice
“Best if your company is deeply, inextricably integrated into the Atlassian ecosystem... historically lags slightly behind GitHub/GitLab” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Source control · scale prompt · alternative
“Bitbucket Cloud at $6.60/user/month offers native integrations and is more cost-effective, though with less self-hosting flexibility” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Source control · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“About one-third of Bitbucket incidents had major impact ... Atlassian struggled with high-severity flaws including CVSS scores over 9” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Source control · negative prompt · soft negative
“still a proprietary hosted service and should be evaluated for retention, access-control, and ecosystem dependence” Perplexity Sonar · Source control · negative prompt · soft negative
“Pick Bitbucket only if you're deep in Atlassian tools—otherwise, its smaller share limits hiring/talent pool.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Source control · direct prompt · soft negative
“The developer community generally rates Bitbucket\u2019s user experience and AI features ... lower than GitHub's.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Source control · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 148 of the 199 answers that named Bitbucket and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
368 of the 368 domain citations in answers naming Bitbucket came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Names read as Bitbucket
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Bitbucket's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Bitbucket, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at bitbucket.org is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.