AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Developer platform › Source control › GitLab vs Gitea
Source control hosting · October 2026 Edition

GitLab vs Gitea

One of fourteen models named GitLab first on the direct prompt; zero named Gitea. GitLab was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Gitea by thirteen and GitLab carries 81 labels and Gitea 27, so the shares are not directly comparable.

GitLab

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

Gitea

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share21%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate14%15%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#4A position in a field of 10; printed, not drawn.
Labels8127A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, GitLab reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.GitHub was named alongside these two in thirteen of the fourteen direct answers. GitHub vs GitLab · GitHub vs Gitea · GitLab vs Bitbucket

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the source control hosting page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
GitLabFirst choices, of fourteen modelsGitea
Direct10
Paraphrase40
Comparative10
Budget-constrained312 against GitLab
Scale-constrained301 against Gitea
Negative129 against GitLab · 3 against Gitea
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, GitLab and Gitea were named in the same answer seventy times, of the 250 answers naming GitLab and the 72 naming Gitea. In those answers Gitea took the first choice four times and GitLab thirteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where GitLab and Gitea stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
GitLab Gitea first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, GitLab on the left and Gitea on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where GitLab and Gitea stood in it.

GitLab first, Gitea not the choice

1 of 14 modelsGitea was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
MiniMax M2.5GitHub, GitLab alternatives: Azure DevOps, Bitbucket

Neither was the first choice, one was named

12 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5GitHub alternatives: Bitbucket, GitLab
GPT-5.4 miniGitHub alternatives: Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, GitLab
Gemini 3.5 FlashGitHub alternatives: GitLab
Perplexity SonarGitHub alternatives: Bitbucket, GitLab
Grok 4.1 FastBitbucket, GitHub alternatives: GitLab
Mistral SmallGitHub alternatives: Bitbucket, GitLab
DeepSeek V4 FlashGitHub alternatives: Bitbucket, GitLab
Qwen 3.7 FlashGitHub alternatives: Bitbucket, GitLab
Kimi K2GitHub alternatives: GitLab
GLM 4.7 FlashXGitHub alternatives: Bitbucket, GitLab
GPT-6 LunaGitHub alternatives: Bitbucket, GitLab
Muse Glimmer 30BGitHub alternatives: Azure DevOps, Azure Repos, GitLab

Neither was named

1 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
GitLab leads by twelve points.
GitLab12%#2 of 7
Gitea0%#4 of 7
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
GitLab leads by nineteen points.
GitLab21%#2 of 10
Gitea2%#4 of 10
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
GitLab leads by thirty points.
GitLab30%#2 of 8
Gitea0%#8 of 8
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about GitLab

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“GitLab SaaS - not budget-friendly for small, scaling teams” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · hard negative
“GitLab SaaS is also worth caution, since one source describes it as not budget-friendly for small, scaling teams” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“GitLab (Self-hosted) | ⚠️ Be cautious - Critical CVEs and configuration risks require expertise” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“GitLab Ultimate/Premium | Unmatched "single-pane-of-glass" DevOps platform. Exceptional built-in CI/CD, security scanning, and compliance tracking.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“GitLab is a popular choice among developers and offers a free plan with unlimited public and private repositories, making it a cost-effective option” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with a pilot of GitHub Enterprise Server or GitLab Self-Managed, as both offer the best balance of enterprise features” GLM 4.7 FlashX · scale prompt · first choice

What the models said about Gitea

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“"For a fresh install in May 2026, I would not pick Gitea"” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“Self-Hosted Gitea / Forgejo ... these have had significant security issues” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Smaller platforms can be riskier due to less mature security practices” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“For a company on a tight budget, the best all‑around choice is Gitea (self‑hosted).” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“Prioritize self-hosted/open options like Forgejo, Gitea, or Codeberg for privacy” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · first choice
“self-hosted open-source options such as Forgejo or Gitea” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.