Source control hosting for enterprise buyers
Asked as “source control hosting platform”, and as “Git hosting service”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 56 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
54%
Clear leader
54GitHub30GitLab04Azure DevOps12others
54% of first choices, clear leader.
Since September 2026▼−7Since September 2026: 56% → 49%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.GitHub held the lead, −7 points on 56%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
GitHub72%Clear leader▼−8Since September 2026: 78% → 71%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-marketGitHub70%Clear leader▼−7Since September 2026: 74% → 67%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →EnterpriseGitHub54%Clear leader▼−7Since September 2026: 56% → 49%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This page
GitHub72%Clear leader▼−8Since September 2026: 78% → 71%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-marketGitHub70%Clear leader▼−7Since September 2026: 74% → 67%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →EnterpriseGitHub54%Clear leader▼−7Since September 2026: 56% → 49%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01GitHub54%22%92endorsed leader▼−7Since September 2026: 56% → 49%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.56% → 49%
GitHub54%22%92endorsed leader▼−7Since September 2026: 56% → 49%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.56% → 49%02
GitLab30%13%82endorsed leader▲+7Since September 2026: 28% → 35%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.28% → 35%
GitLab30%13%82endorsed leader▲+7Since September 2026: 28% → 35%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.28% → 35%03
Bitbucket4%28%75criticized challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 8% → 4%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.8% → 4%
Bitbucket4%28%75criticized challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 8% → 4%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.8% → 4%04
Azure DevOps4%15%34accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 4%
Azure DevOps4%15%34accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 4%Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
08
Gitea0%55%11criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Gitea0%55%11criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%07
AWS CodeCommit0%50%14criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
AWS CodeCommit0%50%14criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%06
Perforce Helix Core0%18%11accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Perforce Helix Core0%18%11accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%05
Azure Repos0%10%20accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Azure Repos0%10%20accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All fifteen head-to-head pages: the top six products, each against each
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102030405060708Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative70%
Key
01GitHub54%
GitHub54%02GitLab30%
GitLab30%03Bitbucket4%
Bitbucket4%04Azure DevOps4%
Azure DevOps4%05Azure Repos0%
Azure Repos0%06Perforce Helix Core0%
Perforce Helix Core0%07AWS CodeCommit0%
AWS CodeCommit0%08Gitea0%
Gitea0%What they warned about
Eight of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
GitHub22%
20 of 92 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“"should primarily be cautious (or avoid) free or public tiers of popular Git hosting platforms like GitHub.com (free), GitLab.com (free)"” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Bitbucket28%
21 of 75 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“"Atlassian has officially announced the end of life (EOL) for their on-premise 'Server' products... should never purchase a license for a product line that is being phased out"” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
GitLab13%
11 of 82 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Avoid cloud GitHub/GitLab at this scale unless negotiating massive custom caps—their usage fees (Actions, compute) make totals unpredictable” Grok 4.1 Fast, budget prompt
AWS CodeCommit50%
7 of 14 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Closed to new customers (July 2024); uncertain long-term roadmap; limited ecosystem | ❌ **Avoid for new deployments**” Kimi K2, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
75 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1123 links across 316 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 70 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · GitHub33 answers · 65 citations · 9 models
vendor site · GitLab27 answers · 50 citations · 10 models
vendor site · GitHub23 answers · 38 citations · 9 models
23 answers · 30 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G222 answers · 46 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Guideflow19 answers · 19 citations · 10 models
19 answers · 19 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Gitnux18 answers · 25 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Atlassian18 answers · 22 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Bitbucket16 answers · 27 citations · 8 models
15 answers · 18 citations · 8 models
vendor site · ZipDo.co15 answers · 17 citations · 7 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
23 answers · 10 models
19 answers · 10 models
19 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 7 models
11 answers · 7 models
9 answers · 5 models
9 answers · 6 models
9 answers · 4 models
8 answers · 5 models
8 answers · 4 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best source control hosting platform”, “source control hosting platform”, “source control hosting platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GitHub github.com | 54% | 237 | 1,500,000 | 31,479 | 42,019,137 | $81 | 14 | |
| GitLab gitlab.com GitLab 30%, GitLab Self-Managed or GitLab Dedicated 2%, GitLab Premium SaaS 0% | 32% | 218 | 90,500 | 4,844 | 603,028 | $884 | 66 | 4 |
| Bitbucket bitbucket.org | 4% | 195 | 33,100 | 1,560 | 22,601 | |||
| Azure parent site Azure DevOps 4%, Azure Repos 0% | 4% | 138 | 301,000 | 47,904 | ||||
| Assembla assembla.com | 2% | 4 | ||||||
| Atlassian atlassian.com Atlassian Bitbucket Data Center 2% | 2% | 2 | 4,724,388 company | $5,906 | 61 | 6 | ||
| GitHub Enterprise Cloud with Data Residency | 2% | |||||||
| Perforce Enterprise Cloud | 2% | |||||||
| Perforce Helix Core perforce.com | 0% | 11 | 260 | 11 | 161,450 | $2,860 | 100 | |
| RhodeCode rhodecode.com | 0% | 4 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 13 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (about.gitlab.com, atlassian.com). The first result for “best source control hosting platform” is reddit.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best source control hosting platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which Git hosting service would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade source control hosting platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best source control hosting platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a source control hosting platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which source control hosting platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceGitHubChangedGitHubAzure DevOpsGitLabagainst: GitHub, Gitea
Three alternatives
GitLab, Gitea, GitoliteFour alternatives
Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, GitLab, RhodeCodeOne alternative
GitHubOne alternative
GitHubGPT-5.4 miniGitHubGitHubHeldno first choiceGitLab Self-Managed or GitLab Dedicatedagainst: GitHubGitHubagainst: AWS CodeCommit, Azure DevOps
Two alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLabTwo alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLabOne alternative
BitbucketTwo alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLabGemini 3.5 FlashGitHub, GitLabagainst: BitbucketGitHub, GitLabHeldagainst: BitbucketGitHubGitLabagainst: Bitbucket, GitHubno first choiceagainst: AWS CodeCommit, Azure Repos, Bitbucket, Gitea, Gitee, Gogs, Google Cloud Source Repositories, Phabricator, SourceForge
One alternative
Azure DevOpsOne alternative
Azure DevOpsFour alternatives
Azure Repos, Bitbucket, GitLab, Perforce Helix CoreThree alternatives
Azure DevOps, GitHub, GiteaPerplexity SonarGitHubGitHubHeldGitHubAssembla, Perforce Enterprise Cloudagainst: GitHubGitLabagainst: Gitea/Forgejoagainst: Apache Subversion, CVS, GitHub, GitLab, Gitea, SourceHut
Three alternatives
Azure DevOps, GitLab, Perforce Helix CoreTwo alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLabFive alternatives
AWS CodeCommit, Atlassian Bitbucket Data Center, Azure Repos, GitLab, Perforce Helix CoreOne alternative
GitLabTwo alternatives
Azure Repos, BitbucketGrok 4.1 FastGitHubGitHubHeldGitHubagainst: AWS CodeCommitAzure DevOpsagainst: GitHub, GitLabGitHubagainst: Bitbucket, Codeberg, Forgejo, GitHub, GitLab, Gitea, SourceHut
Three alternatives
Azure Repos, Bitbucket, GitLabTwo alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLabThree alternatives
Azure Repos, Bitbucket, GitLabOne alternative
BitbucketTwo alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLabMistral SmallGitHubGitHubHeldagainst: BitbucketGitHubGitHubno first choiceagainst: Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, GitHub
Two alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLabTwo alternatives
Azure Repos, GitLabFive alternatives
Azure Repos, Bitbucket, GitLab, Perforce Helix Core, RhodeCodeOne alternative
BitbucketDeepSeek V4 FlashGitHubagainst: BitbucketGitLabChangedGitHubagainst: AWS CodeCommitGitLabagainst: Bitbucket, GitHub, GitLab Premium SaaSGitHub, GitLabagainst: Bitbucket, Codeberg, Coding.net, Forgejo, GitHub, Gitea, Gitee, Gogs, SourceHut
One alternative
GitLabOne alternative
GitHubFour alternatives
Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, GitLab, Perforce Helix CoreTwo alternatives
Azure DevOps, GitHubOne alternative
BitbucketLlama 4 MaverickGitLabno first choiceChangedno first choiceGitLabno first choiceagainst: Perforce Helix Core
Qwen 3.7 FlashGitHubGitHub, GitLabChangedGitHub Enterprise SolutionsBitbucketagainst: Bitbucket, GitHubGitHub, GitLabagainst: SourceForgeagainst: AWS CodeCommit, Azure DevOps, GitHub Public Repositories, GitLab, Rational ClearCase, SourceForge
Two alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLabTwo alternatives
Azure DevOps, BitbucketFour alternatives
Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, GitLab, Perforce Helix CoreOne alternative
GitHubOne alternative
BitbucketKimi K2GitHubGitHubHeldGitHub, GitLabBitbucketagainst: GitLabGitHub Enterprise Cloud with Data Residency, GitLabagainst: AWS CodeCommit, Azure Repos, Bitbucket, GitHub, GitLab, SourceForge
Two alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLabTwo alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLabTwo alternatives
Azure DevOps, BitbucketOne alternative
GitHubOne alternative
BitbucketGLM 4.7 FlashXGitHubGitLabChangedGitHub, GitLabGitLabagainst: Gitea/Forgejono first choiceagainst: AWS CodeCommit, Bitbucket, GitHub, GitLab, Gitea/Forgejo, Google Code, IBM Rational Team Concert (RTC) / ClearCase-based services, Launchpad, Microsoft Team Foundation Server (TFS) / Azure DevOps Repos, Perforce Helix Core, SourceForge
Three alternatives
Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, GitLabThree alternatives
Azure Repos, Bitbucket, GitHubTwo alternatives
Azure DevOps, BitbucketTwo alternatives
Bitbucket, GitHubMiniMax M2.5GitHubGitLabChangedGitHubGitLabagainst: Azure DevOpsGitHubagainst: Bitbucket, GitHub, GitLab
Three alternatives
Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, GitLabThree alternatives
AWS CodeCommit, Bitbucket, GitHubFour alternatives
AWS CodeCommit, Azure Repos, Bitbucket, GitLabOne alternative
BitbucketOne alternative
GitLabGPT-6 LunaGitHubGitHubHeldno first choiceagainst: BitbucketGitHubno first choiceagainst: Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, Forgejo, GitHub, GitLab, Gitea
Three alternatives
Azure Repos, Bitbucket, GitLabTwo alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLabSix alternatives
Azure DevOps, Azure Repos, Bitbucket, GitHub, GitLab, Perforce P4One alternative
Azure DevOpsMuse Glimmer 30BGitHubGitHubHeldGitHub, GitLabAtlassian Bitbucket Data Centeragainst: GitHub, GitLabGitHubagainst: Bitbucketagainst: AWS, Bitbucket, GitHub, GitLab
Two alternatives
Azure DevOps, GitLabThree alternatives
Azure DevOps, Azure Repos, GitLabFive alternatives
AWS CodeCommit, Azure DevOps, Azure Repos, Bitbucket, Perforce Helix CoreTwo alternatives
GitHub, Microsoft Azure DevOps ServerOne alternative
GitLabBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:05 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 12:04 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:44 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 07:58 | yes | 16 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:23 | yes | 25 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 07:43 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:41 | yes | 20 | 35 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:06 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:21 | no | 0 | 32 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:16 | yes | 20 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 12:15 | yes | 20 | 108 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:21 | yes | 10 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 13:51 | yes | 5 | 13 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:58 | yes | 23 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:13 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:48 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:01 | yes | 12 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:18 | yes | 14 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:48 | yes | 19 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:50 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:11 | yes | 25 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:44 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:22 | yes | 5 | 31 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 13:31 | yes | 20 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:57 | yes | 14 | 39 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 13:30 | yes | 10 | 41 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:54 | yes | 4 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 13:02 | yes | 14 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:59 | yes | 9 | 10 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:18 | yes | 7 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:23 | yes | 10 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:52 | yes | 16 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:28 | yes | 23 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 13:08 | yes | 13 | 12 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:13 | yes | 25 | 52 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 12:33 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:03 | no | 0 | 44 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:05 | yes | 10 | 34 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:06 | yes | 25 | 92 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 13:24 | yes | 10 | 23 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:12 | yes | 7 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 12:00 | yes | 15 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 13:14 | yes | 18 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:24 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:01 | yes | 29 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 12:24 | yes | 18 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:06 | yes | 25 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:55 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 13:47 | yes | 25 | 43 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:30 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:47 | yes | 10 | 65 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:57 | yes | 24 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:49 | yes | 24 | 69 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:08 | yes | 24 | 90 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:27 | yes | 2 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:36 | yes | 20 | 39 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 13:11 | yes | 18 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:32 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:48 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:02 | yes | 19 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:49 | yes | 25 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:28 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 07:54 | yes | 24 | 49 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:50 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 12:44 | no | 0 | 37 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 13:23 | yes | 24 | 41 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:37 | yes | 25 | 130 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:53 | yes | 10 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 12:43 | yes | 6 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:23 | yes | 15 | 48 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:21 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:53 | yes | 3 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:32 | yes | 13 | 34 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:11 | yes | 15 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 12:13 | yes | 25 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 12:12 | yes | 15 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 12:15 | yes | 24 | 34 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 12:41 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:52 | yes | 15 | 58 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:12 | yes | 25 | 35 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:35 | yes | 25 | 101 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 12:45 | yes | 25 | 45 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:11 | yes | 5 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:11 | yes | 23 | 31 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Atlassian read as Bitbucket
GitHub Enterprise Server read as GitHub
GitHub Enterprise Server (GHES) read as GitHub
GitHub Enterprise Server (self-hosted) read as GitHub
GitLab SaaS read as GitLab
GitLab Self-Managed read as GitLab
GitLab Ultimate read as GitLab
Unresolved, counted raw
CVS
Coding.net
GitHub AE
GitHub Enterprise Cloud with Data Residency
GitHub Enterprise Solutions (Microsoft)
GitHub Public Repositories
GitLab Premium SaaS
GitLab Self-Managed or GitLab Dedicated
Gitolite
IBM Rational Team Concert (RTC) / ClearCase-based services
Launchpad
Microsoft Azure DevOps Server
Microsoft Team Foundation Server (TFS) / Azure DevOps Repos (legacy)
P4
Perforce Enterprise Cloud
Perforce P4
Rational ClearCase
Unity Version Control
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.