StackHawk vs Intruder
Three of fourteen models named StackHawk first on the direct prompt; three named Intruder. StackHawk was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Intruder by ten and StackHawk carries 30 labels and Intruder 13, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in four categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the dynamic application security testing page.
By framing
StackHawkFirst choices, of fourteen modelsIntruder
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, StackHawk and Intruder were named in the same answer thirty-four times, of the 147 answers naming StackHawk and the 231 naming Intruder. In those answers Intruder took the first choice six times and StackHawk eight.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | |
StackHawk Intruder first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, StackHawk on the left and Intruder on the right.The direct prompt
StackHawk first, Intruder an alternative
3 of 14 modelsIntruder was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Intruder first, StackHawk not the choice
3 of 14 modelsStackHawk was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Intruder16%#2 of 12StackHawk12%#3 of 12StackHawk8%#4 of 11Intruder6%#6 of 11What the models said about StackHawk
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“tools like StackHawk are built on ZAP, but they're not the cheapest option for a tight budget” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · soft negative
“For most mid-market B2B companies, StackHawk offers the best balance of features, pricing, and developer experience.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Intruder
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“If you need a tool that is easy to set up, offers good support, and doesn't require deep security expertise, Intruder is likely the best fit.” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.