IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes · September 2026 Edition

Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security · 1 category · Ranked

Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes

31Judge labels

0First choices

4Negative labels

11 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Best standing

0% in Container security for mid-market buyers

Rank 15 of 78 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger

0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 10 labels there were negative.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business25 of 62

criticized challenger

In container security · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Container and Kubernetes security	Cloud and infrastructure	0%	15 of 78	0%	10	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	3	4
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labelsNone

Paraphrase7 labelsNone

Comparative8 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained5 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative31 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If your mid-market B2B company is already deeply invested in the OpenShift ecosystem, RHACS is often the default "correct" choice” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Container security · direct prompt · alternative

“Choose RHACS if you're married to Red Hat/OpenShift.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Container security · comparative prompt · alternative

“Red Hat ACS (if on OpenShift)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Container security · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, over the 31 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Aqua Security30 of 319Not in the top three

Prisma Cloud26 of 313Not in the top three

Falco21 of 315Not in the top three

Trivy20 of 317Not in the top three

Sysdig Secure18 of 314Not in the top three

Wiz18 of 314Not in the top three

Snyk15 of 310Not in the top three

Kubescape14 of 314Not in the top three

Sysdig13 of 312Not in the top three

SUSE NeuVector12 of 310Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 28 of the 31 answers that named Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cyberpress.org26

gbhackers.com26

cybersecuritynews.com20

decryptiondigest.com14

expertinsights.com14

ox.security10

vcso.ai8

safeguard.sh7

checkmarx.com6

cipherssecurity.com6

137 of the 137 domain citations in answers naming Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cyberpress.org/container-security-by-business-size-221

gbhackers.com/best-container-security-compared19

cybersecuritynews.com/best-container-security-tools12

expertinsights.com/application-security/the-top-container-security-tools12

decryptiondigest.com/blog/guide-finding-best-container-security-tools10

gbhackers.com/best-kubernetes-security-compared9

vcso.ai/learn/best-container-security-tools-20268

ox.security/blog/container-security-tools-20267

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes; a claim can dispute any of them.

Red Hat ACS 3ACS 1Red Hat ACS / OpenShift 1Red Hat ACS/StackRox 1Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security 1Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security (RHACS) 1Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security (RHACS, powered by StackRox) 1StackRox 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at redhat.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.