Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 25 → 51 of 66
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security · 2 categories · RankedRed Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes
33Judge labels
0First choices
4Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Container security for mid-market buyers
Rank 11 of 77 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 15 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business58 of 74
0%9 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market11 of 77
0%15 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise15 of 84
0%8 labels
under the label threshold
In container security · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Container and Kubernetes security | Cloud and infrastructure | 0% | 11 of 77 | 0% | 15 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Cloud security posture management | Cloud and infrastructure | 0% | 55 of 80 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Wiz at 37% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Container security · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 13 → 10 of 68
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 9 → 19 of 71
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Container security | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 13 → 11 of 77 |
| CSPM | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 55 of 80, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labelsNone
Paraphrase6 labelsNone
Comparative10 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative33 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“or look at Stackrox/Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security, which wraps Falco in a polished, supported package” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Container security · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Red Hat has replaced it with Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security (RHACS)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Container security · negative prompt · alternative
“Best for Kubernetes-native supply chain security and policy enforcement” Mistral Small · Container security · comparative prompt · alternative
“Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security (ACS) | OpenShift environments” Kimi K2 · Container security · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, over the 33 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, over the 33 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 30 of the 33 answers that named Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
cyberpress.org20
esecurityplanet.com16
expertinsights.com13
gbhackers.com12
portainer.io11
cybersecuritynews.com10
g2.com10
ox.security9
thectoclub.com9
checkmarx.com8
118 of the 118 domain citations in answers naming Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
redhat.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes takes 0% of first choices and Trivy takes 22%.ShowHide
Search and answers
redhat.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes takes 0% of first choices and Trivy takes 22%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “container security platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “container security platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 40 a month (“red hat advanced cluster security for kubernetes”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 1 a month
- Its company's site
- redhat.com shared with Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 1,347,338 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 147,391 · 16,512 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 105,781
- Paid Google search
- 5 searches its ads show for, about 20 clicks and $281 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 11 of 77 in container security
Segment leader
22%
Trivy
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 33 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 30 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes; a claim can dispute any of them.
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security (ACS) 6Red Hat ACS 3Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security (RHACS) 2Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security 1StackRox (Red Hat) 1Stackrox 1Stackrox/Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security 1
Follow Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security is the company behind Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes.ShowHide
The company
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security is the company behind Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Kubernetes-native container security
- Free plan or trial
- Experimenta la versión de prueba de 60 días con soporte a cargo de los usuarios. redhat.com/es/technologies/cloud-computing/openshift/advanced-cluster-security-kubernetes
- Not stated on the pages read
- Who it is for, price, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: redhat.com/es/interactive-demo/red-hat-advanced-cluster-security-overview, redhat.com/es/resources/advanced-cluster-security-for-kubernetes-datasheet, redhat.com/es/interactive-demo/openshift-compliance-red-hat-advanced-cluster-security, redhat.com/es/technologies/cloud-computing/openshift/advanced-cluster-security-kubernetes, redhat.com/es/technologies/cloud-computing/openshift/advanced-cluster-security-kubernetes/trial. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.