IT AI Index
September 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index Cloud and infrastructure Container security › Enterprise September 2026 Edition

Container and Kubernetes security for enterprise buyers

Asked as “container security platform”, and as “Kubernetes security tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 51 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing
Contested
29% of first choices, contested.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

01The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
01Aqua Security29%9%56accepted challenger
02Prisma Cloud24%23%52accepted challenger
03Wiz20%10%40accepted challenger
04Sysdig Secure12%0%35accepted challenger
05Sysdig4%23%22accepted challenger
06Snyk4%35%23criticized challenger
Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
11Trivy0%25%12criticized challenger
10Falco0%22%18accepted challenger
09Snyk Container0%20%10accepted challenger
08SUSE NeuVector0%9%11accepted challenger
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its vendor page.

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Aqua Security29%
02Prisma Cloud24%
03Wiz20%
04Sysdig Secure12%
05Sysdig4%
06Snyk4%
07Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes0%
08SUSE NeuVector0%
09Snyk Container0%
10Falco0%
11Trivy0%

02What they warned about

Four of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2 and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Prisma Cloud
23%
12 of 52 labels negative · 9 of 12 models · 2 hard negative
“Avoid credit-based models (like Prisma Cloud) if predictability is your top priority” Kimi K2, budget prompt
Snyk
35%
8 of 23 labels negative · 5 of 12 models · 2 hard negative
“platforms like **Snyk**—which traditionally bill **per contributing developer**—can become extremely expensive and unpredictable” Gemini 3.5 Flash, budget prompt
Aqua Security
9%
5 of 56 labels negative · 5 of 12 models
“While technically strong for container-specific security, enterprises should be cautious because: It's fundamentally a **point solution**” Kimi K2, negative prompt
Sysdig
23%
5 of 22 labels negative · 4 of 12 models
“Traditional Agent-Based Runtime Scanners (e.g., Older Models of Sysdig/Aqua) ... these agents can consume excessive CPU and memory resources” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt

03What they cite

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: twelve of the twelve in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.

Sites the answers cite

67 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 4 of those lists are Google grounding redirects that name no site and are left out of the counts. 930 links across 221 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.

45 answers · 60 citations · 10 models
44 answers · 50 citations · 10 models
35 answers · 48 citations · 10 models
34 answers · 43 citations · 10 models
30 answers · 40 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Checkmarx22 answers · 30 citations · 10 models
vendor site · SentinelOne20 answers · 27 citations · 8 models
16 answers · 23 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Expert Insights13 answers · 13 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Portainer13 answers · 13 citations · 5 models
vendor site · Sysdig12 answers · 22 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Aikido12 answers · 15 citations · 9 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

04How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ModelDirect“What is the best container security platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which Kubernetes security tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade container security platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best container security platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a container security platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which container security platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud
Three alternativesSnyk, Sysdig Secure, Wiz
Aqua Security, WizChanged
Two alternativesAccuKnox, Portainer
Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Wiz
One alternativeSysdig Secure
Wiz
Four alternativesAqua Security, OX Security, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security, Sysdig Secure
against: Snyk
no first choiceagainst: Anchore, Falco, Kubernetes, Trivy
GPT-5.4 miniSysdig Secure
Two alternativesAqua Security, Wiz
Sysdig SecureHeld
One alternativeRed Hat OpenShift
Wiz
Six alternativesAnchore, Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure
against: Harbor
Sysdig Secure
One alternativeAqua Security
no first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashWiz
Three alternativesAqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Secure
WizHeld
Three alternativesPrisma Cloud, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Sysdig Secure
Wiz
Three alternativesAqua Security, Snyk, Sysdig Secure
against: Prisma Cloud
Sysdig Secure, Wiz
Two alternativesPrisma Cloud, SUSE NeuVector
against: Snyk
no first choiceagainst: Anchore, Docker Scout, Elastic "Defend for Containers", FortiCNAPP, JFrog Xray, Sonatype IQ, Tenable Legacy Container Security, Trivy, Wiz
Perplexity SonarPrisma Cloud
Four alternativesAqua Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security, Wiz
Aqua SecurityChanged
Two alternativesPrisma Cloud, Sysdig
Aqua Security
Four alternativesPrisma Cloud, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure, Wiz
Aqua Security
One alternativePrisma Cloud
against: Snyk Container
no first choicenothing named
Grok 4.1 FastAqua Security, Prisma Cloud
One alternativeSysdig Secure
against: Snyk, Wiz
Prisma CloudChanged
Five alternativesAqua Security, OPA/Gatekeeper, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Sysdig Secure, Wiz
against: Falco, Kubescape
Aqua Security
Six alternativesCrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Prisma Cloud, Snyk, Sysdig Secure, Wiz
Microsoft Defender for Containers
Three alternativesAqua Security, SUSE NeuVector, Sysdig Secure
against: Prisma Cloud, Snyk
Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Secure
Two alternativesSnyk, Wiz
against: Falco, Prisma Cloud, Snyk, Trivy, Wiz
Mistral SmallAqua Security
Two alternativesSysdig Secure, Wiz
KubescapeChanged
Three alternativesCalico, Falco, Portainer
Aqua Security
Five alternativesOX Security, Prisma Cloud, SUSE NeuVector, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure
Aikido Securityagainst: Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Sysdigno first choiceagainst: Lacework, Trend Micro (Trend) Container Security
DeepSeek V4 FlashPrisma Cloud, Wiz
Three alternativesAqua Security, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Sysdig
Prisma Cloud, WizHeld
Two alternativesAqua Security, Sysdig
Aqua Security
Six alternativesPrisma Cloud, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, SUSE NeuVector, Snyk, Sysdig Secure, Wiz
Snyk
Two alternativesAqua Security, Sysdig
against: Prisma Cloud, Tigera, Trend
no first choiceagainst: Aporeto, Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Protego, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, SUSE NeuVector
Llama 4 Maverickno first choiceAqua Security, Prisma Cloud, SysdigChanged
Three alternativesAikido Security, Falco, Kubescape
Aqua Security
Two alternativesPrisma Cloud, Sysdig
no first choiceno first choiceagainst: Prisma Cloud
Qwen 3.7 FlashAqua Security
Four alternativesPrisma Cloud, Snyk, Sysdig Secure, Wiz
Prisma Cloud, WizChanged
Four alternativesAqua Security, Falco, Kubescape, Sysdig Secure
Aqua Security
Five alternativesPrisma Cloud, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Snyk, Sysdig Secure, Wiz
Aqua Security, Sysdig Secure
One alternativeMicrosoft Defender for Containers
against: Snyk
no first choiceagainst: Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Snyk, Sysdig
Kimi K2Aqua Security, Wiz
Two alternativesPrisma Cloud, Sysdig Secure
Aqua Security, Prisma CloudChanged
Two alternativesRed Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Sysdig Secure
against: Falco, Kubescape
Aqua Security
Four alternativesPrisma Cloud, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure, Wiz
Aqua Security
One alternativeMicrosoft Defender for Cloud
against: Prisma Cloud, Sysdig
Wiz
Three alternativesAqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Secure
against: Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig, Wiz
GLM 4.7 FlashXPrisma Cloud
Four alternativesAqua Security, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Sysdig Secure, Wiz
against: Snyk Container
Prisma CloudHeld
Two alternativesAqua Security, Sysdig
Aqua Security, Sysdig Secure
Four alternativesPrisma Cloud, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Snyk, Wiz
Snyk
One alternativeSysdig
no first choiceagainst: Google Cloud Container Security, Prisma Cloud, Tenable Container Security
MiniMax M2.5Aqua Security, Sysdig
Four alternativesPrisma Cloud, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, SUSE NeuVector, Wiz
Aqua SecurityChanged
Three alternativesLacework, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Secure
Aqua Security, Sysdig
Four alternativesPrisma Cloud, SUSE NeuVector, Snyk Container, Wiz
Aikido Security
One alternativeMicrosoft Defender for Containers
against: Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Snyk, Sysdig
no first choicenothing named
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

05The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 13:22yes98 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 11:55yes36 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 13:56yes1830 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 11:19yes205 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-09-17 14:00yes3415 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 09:39yes1010 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 11:43yes1017 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 13:42yes53 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 10:03yes1426 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 13:52yes1628 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 12:13yes19103 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 13:19yes631 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 12:21yes1110 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 11:04yes36 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 12:24no015 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 12:19yes204 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-09-17 09:48yes3516 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 11:40yes54 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 11:51yes2320 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 11:27yes53 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 09:41yes950 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 10:28yes1725 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 09:50yes20204 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 11:07no052 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 11:25yes1812 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 13:48yes313 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 13:14yes1627 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 13:12yes2010 s
ComparativeGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-09-17 10:49yes1817 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 13:22yes57 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 13:00yes1623 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 13:11yes54 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 10:22yes537 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 12:53yes1228 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 10:14yes1794 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 11:55yes928 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 10:18yes149 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 10:43yes36 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 12:04yes2034 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 12:48yes207 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-09-17 12:36yes3423 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 10:29yes98 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 13:52yes1923 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 13:30yes53 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 10:08yes1885 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 13:07yes921 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 10:46yes31136 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 13:32yes2259 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 13:06yes1813 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 12:26yes514 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 14:02no015 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 12:16yes207 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-09-17 09:54yes1410 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 12:54no06 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 13:28yes2926 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 09:41yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 10:48yes538 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 13:04yes1439 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 11:46yes15149 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 12:21no067 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 13:35yes2213 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 13:24yes47 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 13:26yes1628 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 13:45yes205 s
Negative framingGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-09-17 11:06yes2315 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 09:38yes56 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 12:20yes2931 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 13:08yes53 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 10:30yes1499 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 11:07yes2634 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 11:45yes28220 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 12:06yes2351 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

Category-scoped readings
Aqua read as Aqua Security
Aqua Platform read as Aqua Security
Palo Alto Networks (Prisma Cloud) read as Prisma Cloud
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security read as Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security (ACS) read as Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security (RHACS) read as Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes
SentinelOne read as SentinelOne Singularity
Unresolved, counted raw
Aporeto
Checkmarx Container Security Solution
Cisco Isovalent
ClamAV
Elastic "Defend for Containers"
Protego
RapidFort
Sonatype IQ
Tenable Container Security
Tenable Legacy Container Security (TIO-CSI)
ThreatMapper
Tigera
Trend Micro (Trend) Container Security
Trivy+Falco
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← CNAPPIaC →