Cloud-native application protection for enterprise buyers
Asked as “CNAPP”, and as “cloud-native application protection platform”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 54 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
48%
Clear leader
48Wiz17Microsoft Defender for Cloud13Prisma Cloud22others
48% of first choices, clear leader.
Since September 2026▼−6Since September 2026: 49% → 43%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Wiz held the lead, −6 points on 49%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Aikido Security29%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Aikido Security (31%) replaces Microsoft Defender for Cloud (46% then, 27% now), 4 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →Mid-market
Wiz37%Contested▼−11Since September 2026: 46% → 35%, −11 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →EnterpriseWiz48%Clear leader▼−6Since September 2026: 49% → 43%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This page
Aikido Security29%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Aikido Security (31%) replaces Microsoft Defender for Cloud (46% then, 27% now), 4 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketWiz37%Contested▼−11Since September 2026: 46% → 35%, −11 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →EnterpriseWiz48%Clear leader▼−6Since September 2026: 49% → 43%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Wiz48%20%69endorsed leader▼−6Since September 2026: 49% → 43%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.49% → 43%
Wiz48%20%69endorsed leader▼−6Since September 2026: 49% → 43%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.49% → 43%02
Microsoft Defender for Cloud17%14%51accepted challenger▼−8Since September 2026: 28% → 20%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.28% → 20%
Microsoft Defender for Cloud17%14%51accepted challenger▼−8Since September 2026: 28% → 20%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.28% → 20%03
Prisma Cloud13%19%43accepted challenger▲+1Since September 2026: 13% → 14%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.13% → 14%
Prisma Cloud13%19%43accepted challenger▲+1Since September 2026: 13% → 14%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.13% → 14%04
Orca Security7%14%43accepted challenger▼−1Since September 2026: 8% → 7%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.8% → 7%
Orca Security7%14%43accepted challenger▼−1Since September 2026: 8% → 7%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.8% → 7%05
Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud4%23%26accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud4%23%26accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%06
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security4%0%14accepted challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 5%
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security4%0%14accepted challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 5%07
Check Point CloudGuard2%12%17accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 3% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.3% → 2%
Check Point CloudGuard2%12%17accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 3% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.3% → 2%Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
11FortiCNAPP0%38%13criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
10
Aqua Security0%20%10accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Aqua Security0%20%10accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%08
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security0%6%32accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security0%6%32accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%09
Sysdig Secure0%4%27accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Sysdig Secure0%4%27accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All fifteen head-to-head pages: the top six products, each against each
Wiz vs Aqua SecurityWiz vs FortiCNAPPMicrosoft Defender for Cloud vs Orca SecurityMicrosoft Defender for Cloud vs Aikido SecurityMicrosoft Defender for Cloud vs Aqua SecurityMicrosoft Defender for Cloud vs FortiCNAPPOrca Security vs Aikido SecurityOrca Security vs Aqua SecurityOrca Security vs FortiCNAPPAikido Security vs Aqua SecurityAikido Security vs FortiCNAPPAqua Security vs FortiCNAPP
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01020304050607080910F11
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Wiz48%
Wiz48%02Microsoft Defender for Cloud17%
Microsoft Defender for Cloud17%03Prisma Cloud13%
Prisma Cloud13%04Orca Security7%
Orca Security7%05Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud4%
Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud4%06SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security4%
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security4%07Check Point CloudGuard2%
Check Point CloudGuard2%08CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security0%
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security0%09Sysdig Secure0%
Sysdig Secure0%10Aqua Security0%
Aqua Security0%11FortiCNAPP0%
What they warned about
Six of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Wiz20%
14 of 69 labels negative · 9 of 14 models
“Excellent for speed and graph-based risk prioritization; ... but slightly less mature in full runtime/workload protection for ultra-large scales” Grok 4.1 Fast, paraphrase prompt
Microsoft Defender for Cloud14%
7 of 51 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“**Verdict:** Avoid as a *primary* CNAPP if you are a heavy Multi-Cloud enterprise” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
Prisma Cloud19%
8 of 43 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“**Avoid** if you have a lean security team or need fast time-to-value. **Be cautious** if you are a large enterprise already invested in Palo Alto's firewall stack” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
Orca Security14%
6 of 43 labels negative · 6 of 14 models
“Vendors that sell the ease of "100% agentless deployment" (such as Orca Security or Wiz used *exclusively* in agentless mode)” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
79 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1156 links across 242 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 49 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
37 answers · 37 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Fidelis Security36 answers · 38 citations · 12 models
vendor site · CyberPress33 answers · 41 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Wiz29 answers · 34 citations · 11 models
vendor site · AccuKnox24 answers · 33 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Orca24 answers · 32 citations · 11 models
23 answers · 23 citations · 11 models
vendor site · SentinelOne22 answers · 30 citations · 8 models
21 answers · 27 citations · 10 models
18 answers · 29 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Microsoft18 answers · 24 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Check Point18 answers · 23 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
35 answers · 11 models
35 answers · 12 models
31 answers · 10 models
21 answers · 10 models
17 answers · 10 models
15 answers · 8 models
15 answers · 9 models
14 answers · 7 models
14 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best cnapp”, “cnapp”, “cnapps”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wiz wiz.io | 48% | 688 | 40,500 | 16,751 | 102,573 | $6,856 | 120 | 2 |
| Microsoft Defender microsoft.com Microsoft Defender for Cloud 17%, Microsoft 0% | 17% | 569 | 2,240,000 | 403,136 | 145,358,109 company | $12,455 | 103 | 1 |
| Prisma prismacloud.io Prisma Cloud 13% | 13% | 475 | 1,300 | 97 | 2,039 | |||
| Orca Security orca.security | 7% | 401 | 1,900 | 103 | 125,483 | $441 | 27 | 8 |
| Palo Alto Networks parent site Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud 4% | 4% | 227 | 40,500 | 1,088 | ||||
| SentinelOne parent site SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security 4% | 4% | 55 | 33,100 | 1,675 | ||||
| Check Point parent site Check Point CloudGuard 2% | 2% | 53 | 14,800 | 4,487 | ||||
| Trend Micro trendmicro.com Trend Micro Cloud One 2% | 2% | 14 | 18,100 | 1,728 | 588,295 company | $541 | 112 | |
| CloudAware CNAPP Enterprise | 2% | |||||||
| Zscaler Cloud Security | 2% |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 22 sites; 8 of them are among the sites the models cited here (accuknox.com, checkpoint.com, fidelissecurity.com, gartner.com, microsoft.com, orca.security, sentinelone.com, wiz.io). The first result for “best cnapp” is gartner.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best CNAPP for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which cloud-native application protection platform would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade CNAPPs and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best CNAPP for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a CNAPP. What should we look at?”Negative“Which CNAPPs should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5WizSentinelOne Singularity Cloud SecurityChangedno first choiceMicrosoft Defender for Cloudno first choiceagainst: Aqua Security, Check Point CloudGuard, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Prisma Cloud, Wiz
Two alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Prisma CloudTwo alternatives
Prisma Cloud, WizTwo alternatives
Orca Security, Prisma CloudGPT-5.4 miniWizWizHeldno first choiceCheck Point CloudGuardno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Palo Alto Networks Cortex CloudThree alternatives
Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig SecureNine alternatives
Check Point CloudGuard, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security, Sysdig Secure, Tenable Cloud Security, Trend Micro Cloud One, WizOne alternative
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud SecurityGemini 3.5 FlashWizPalo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, WizChangedWizOrca Securityagainst: GitHub Advanced Security, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, Snykno first choiceagainst: Orca Security, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, Wiz
Four alternatives
Orca Security, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig SecureTwo alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Sysdig SecureSeven alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, SentinelOne Singularity, Sweet Security, Sysdig Secure, UpwindOne alternative
WizPerplexity SonarWizWizHeldWizCloudAware CNAPP Enterpriseno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca Security
Two alternatives
Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Prisma CloudFour alternatives
Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca Security, Prisma Cloud, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud SecurityFive alternatives
Check Point CloudGuard, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca Security, Prisma CloudThree alternatives
Cyscale CNAPP, Prisma Cloud, WizGrok 4.1 FastPrisma Cloud, WizPrisma CloudChangedagainst: WizWizMicrosoft Defender for Cloudagainst: Prisma Cloud, Wizno first choiceagainst: FortiCNAPP, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, Prisma Cloud, Wiz
One alternative
Microsoft Defender for CloudThree alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, SentinelOne SingularitySix alternatives
Check Point CloudGuard, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca Security, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig SecureTwo alternatives
Orca Security, Sysdig SecureMistral SmallSentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security, Trend Micro Cloud Oneno first choiceChangedno first choiceMicrosoft Defender for Cloudagainst: Orca Security, Wizno first choiceagainst: FortiCNAPP, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, Prisma Cloud, Wiz
Two alternatives
Sysdig Secure, WizDeepSeek V4 FlashWizWizHeldWizMicrosoft Defender for Cloudagainst: Orca Securityno first choiceagainst: Check Point CloudGuard, CrowdStrike, FortiCNAPP, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Prisma Cloud, Trend Micro Cloud One, Wiz
Three alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Prisma CloudThree alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Palo Alto Networks Cortex CloudSeven alternatives
Aqua Security, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca Security, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Secure, Tenable Cloud SecurityThree alternatives
Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Secure, WizLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceMicrosoft Defender for CloudChangedno first choiceno first choiceWiznothing named
Three alternatives
Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca Security, Prisma CloudQwen 3.7 FlashMicrosoft Defender for CloudWizChangedPalo Alto Networks Cortex CloudZscaler Cloud Securityagainst: Orca Security, Wizno first choiceagainst: FortiCNAPP, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, Wiz
Four alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, FortiCNAPP, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, WizThree alternatives
Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca Security, Palo Alto Networks Cortex CloudThree alternatives
Microsoft, Trend Micro Cloud One, WizTwo alternatives
Check Point CloudGuard, Microsoft Defender for CloudKimi K2Prisma Cloud, WizPrisma Cloud, WizHeldOrca Security, Wizagainst: Aqua SecurityOrca Securityagainst: Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Prisma CloudOrca Security, Prisma Cloud, Wizagainst: Wiz
Two alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Microsoft Defender for CloudThree alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca SecurityThree alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig SecureOne alternative
WizGLM 4.7 FlashXWizWizHeldOrca Security, Wizagainst: Prisma CloudMicrosoft Defender for Cloudagainst: Wizno first choiceagainst: CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Fidelis CloudPassage Halo, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca Security, Prisma Cloud, Qualys, Sysdig Secure, Wiz
Five alternatives
Aqua Security, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Prisma Cloud, Rapid7 InsightCloudSecOne alternative
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud SecuritySix alternatives
Aqua Security, Check Point CloudGuard, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, FortiCNAPP, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Sysdig SecureOne alternative
Prisma CloudMiniMax M2.5Microsoft Defender for CloudPrisma Cloud, WizChangedPalo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, WizMicrosoft Defender for CloudWiznothing named
One alternative
Check Point CloudGuardOne alternative
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud SecurityTwo alternatives
CrowdStrike, Microsoft Defender for CloudTwo alternatives
Prisma Cloud, WizThree alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Palo Alto Networks Cortex CloudGPT-6 LunaWizWizHeldWizPrisma Cloud, Wizno first choiceagainst: AWS Security Hub, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud
Two alternatives
Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Palo Alto Networks Cortex CloudTwo alternatives
Orca Security, Palo Alto Networks Cortex CloudFive alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca Security, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, Sysdig SecureThree alternatives
AWS Security Hub, Google Security Command Center, Microsoft Defender for CloudMuse Glimmer 30BWizPalo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, WizChangedPalo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, WizWizOrca Security, Wizagainst: Fidelis CloudPassage Halo, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Wiz
Two alternatives
Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Prisma CloudOne alternative
Microsoft Defender for CloudFour alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca Security, Sysdig SecureOne alternative
Microsoft Defender for CloudThree alternatives
FortiCNAPP, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig SecureBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:37 | yes | 16 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:13 | yes | 1 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:06 | yes | 13 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:41 | yes | 24 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 07:28 | yes | 21 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 12:17 | yes | 13 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:53 | yes | 20 | 42 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:47 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 13:40 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 13:17 | yes | 18 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:31 | yes | 14 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:00 | yes | 5 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 12:27 | yes | 5 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 12:12 | yes | 15 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:07 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 12:34 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:08 | yes | 10 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:36 | yes | 21 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:56 | yes | 24 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:12 | no | 0 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 13:48 | yes | 23 | 51 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 07:53 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:03 | no | 0 | 32 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 07:38 | yes | 25 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 13:13 | yes | 14 | 52 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 07:55 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:24 | yes | 3 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 07:53 | yes | 13 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:48 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:50 | yes | 5 | 14 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:24 | yes | 14 | 42 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 12:56 | yes | 22 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 13:32 | yes | 21 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 13:39 | yes | 22 | 15 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:50 | yes | 22 | 46 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 07:28 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:16 | no | 0 | 32 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:49 | yes | 24 | 31 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:40 | yes | 22 | 29 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 07:55 | yes | 20 | 27 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:57 | yes | 8 | 29 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 12:25 | yes | 14 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:23 | yes | 14 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:53 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 12:41 | yes | 22 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:59 | yes | 17 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 13:17 | yes | 22 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:35 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:22 | yes | 20 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:08 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 13:02 | yes | 21 | 137 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:02 | yes | 24 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:33 | yes | 24 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 13:23 | yes | 19 | 49 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:55 | yes | 4 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:31 | yes | 25 | 47 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:05 | yes | 27 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:19 | yes | 4 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:40 | yes | 7 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:05 | yes | 22 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:50 | yes | 21 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:41 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 13:01 | yes | 18 | 60 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:22 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:30 | no | 0 | 41 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:18 | yes | 25 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:58 | yes | 22 | 44 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:52 | yes | 9 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:29 | yes | 2 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:17 | yes | 20 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:27 | yes | 18 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 07:27 | yes | 4 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:02 | yes | 20 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 07:27 | yes | 22 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:51 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:29 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:25 | yes | 22 | 59 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:41 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 07:40 | yes | 20 | 62 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:49 | yes | 24 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:46 | yes | 20 | 34 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:14 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 13:26 | yes | 4 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:59 | yes | 23 | 29 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Check Point read as Check Point CloudGuard
CrowdStrike Falcon read as CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud read as CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security
Fortinet read as FortiCNAPP
Fortinet (incorporating Lacework) read as FortiCNAPP
Lacework read as FortiCNAPP
Lacework (Fortinet FortiCNAPP) read as FortiCNAPP
Orca read as Orca Security
Palo Alto (Prisma Cloud) read as Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud
Palo Alto Cortex Cloud read as Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud
Palo Alto Networks read as Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud
Palo Alto Networks (Cortex Cloud/Prisma Cloud) read as Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud
Palo Alto Networks (Cortex Xpanse) read as Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud
Palo Alto Networks (Prisma Cloud / Cortex Cloud) read as Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud
Palo Alto Networks (Prisma Cloud) read as Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud, now Cortex Cloud read as Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud
Palo Alto Prisma Cloud / Cortex Cloud read as Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud
Rapid7 read as Rapid7 InsightCloudSec
SentinelOne read as SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security
Sysdig read as Sysdig Secure
Tenable read as Tenable Cloud Security
Trend Micro read as Trend Micro Cloud One
Trend Micro (Zero Trust XDR / Wavelength) read as Trend Micro Cloud One
Unresolved, counted raw
CNAPP Enterprise
CloudAware CNAPP Enterprise
Cyscale CNAPP
Orca Cloud Security Platform
Zscaler Cloud Security
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.