AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › FortiCNAPP · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

FortiCNAPP

68Judge labels
5First choices
23Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
7% in CNAPP for small business buyers
Rank 9 of 70 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 30% of its 20 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of FortiCNAPP →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In cnapp · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named FortiCNAPP for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Cloud-native application protectionCloud and infrastructure1%9 of 7030%20criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, FortiCNAPP held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · CNAPP · by segment

Small business▲+8Since September 2026: 0% → 8%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
8%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 3 pointsRank 52 → 4 of 58
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 50 → 7 of 68
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 30 → 35 of 35

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
CNAPP0%2%▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 50 → 9 of 70

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated FortiCNAPP across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00101
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.2000123
Mistral Small01102
DeepSeek V4 Flash00123
Llama 4 Maverick10001
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K200011
GLM 4.7 FlashX01203
MiniMax M2.500213
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct17 labels3
Paraphrase6 labels2
Comparative14 labelsNone
Budget-constrained7 labelsNone
Scale-constrained8 labelsNone
Negative16 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative68 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“FortiCNAPP (formerly Lacework) - an AI-powered CNAPP that delivers unified security across multi-cloud and hybrid environments.” Llama 4 Maverick · CNAPP · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Lacework is also mentioned as a strong contender for mid-market organizations” Mistral Small · CNAPP · direct prompt · alternative
“Lacework: (Good if you need heavy runtime/container observability).” Qwen 3.7 Flash · CNAPP · scale prompt · alternative
“For behavior‑first runtime monitoring, Lacework (Fortinet) shines.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · CNAPP · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“The strongest caution flags in the current market are around: - Lacework (post-collapse transition to Fortinet)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · CNAPP · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid Lacework/FortiCNAPP if you need rapid deployment, clean UX, or China coverage” Kimi K2 · CNAPP · negative prompt · hard negative
“Weaknesses: Identity and entitlement (CIEM) capabilities historically weaker; integration with Fortinet's ecosystem is still maturing.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · CNAPP · comparative prompt · soft negative
“Lacework at 67%. Post-acquisition concerns (e.g., integration hiccups) may contribute.” Grok 4.20 · CNAPP · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as FortiCNAPP, over the 62 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and FortiCNAPP was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Wiz49 of 6223Compare →
Prisma Cloud34 of 621Not among the top eight
Sysdig Secure26 of 622Not among the top eight
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security25 of 621Not among the top eight
Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud14 of 620Not among the top eight
Check Point CloudGuard9 of 620Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named FortiCNAPP. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 61 of the 62 answers that named FortiCNAPP and are not a share of its labels.

Search and answers

Where FortiCNAPP stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Searches for its name, Google
170 a month (“forticnapp”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
3 a month
Its own site
No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
1%
rank 9 of 70 in CNAPP
Segment leader
37%
Wiz
First choices
5 across its categories
Named in
62 answers
Its own site cited
No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as FortiCNAPP

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as FortiCNAPP; a claim can dispute any of them.
Lacework 12FortiCNAPP (Fortinet) 1FortiCNAPP (Lacework) 1FortiCNAPP (formerly Lacework) 1Fortinet 1Lacework (now FortiCNAPP by Fortinet) 1Lacework (now FortiCNAPP) 1Lacework (now part of Fortinet) 1Lacework/FortiCNAPP 1

Follow FortiCNAPP

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when FortiCNAPP's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as FortiCNAPP, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for FortiCNAPP by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where FortiCNAPP is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name FortiCNAPP, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at the vendor's own domain is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.