IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security · September 2026 Edition

SentinelOne · 3 categories · Ranked

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

40Judge labels

0First choices

2Negative labels

11 of 12Models named it

3Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Best standing

0% in CNAPP for mid-market buyers

Rank 9 of 57 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger

0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 12 labels there were negative.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market9 of 57

accepted challenger

Enterprise10 of 35

under the label threshold

In cnapp · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Cloud-native application protection	Cloud and infrastructure	0%	9 of 57	0%	12	accepted challenger
Cloud security posture management	Cloud and infrastructure	0%	20 of 53	17%	6	under 10 labels · led by Wiz at 43%
Container and Kubernetes security	Cloud and infrastructure	0%	33 of 78	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Aqua Security at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	2	0	3
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	2	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	2	1	1	4
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	2	0	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	2	0	3
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labelsNone

Paraphrase4 labelsNone

Comparative21 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative40 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you already use one of these for Endpoint Detection & Response (EDR), consolidating your cloud security with them can make financial and operational sense” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CNAPP · scale prompt · alternative

“For enterprises with heavy AWS usage, SentinelOne is the best CSPM vendor ideal for deep AWS integration.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · CSPM · comparative prompt · alternative

“consistently earn Gartner Customers' Choice with 96\u201399% willingness-to-recommend” DeepSeek V4 Flash · CNAPP · negative prompt · alternative

“Endpoint-integrated CNAPPs with strong runtime.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Container security · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“appear frequently but rank lower for enterprise scale” Grok 4.1 Fast · CSPM · comparative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security, over the 40 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Wiz38 of 4021Not in the top three

Prisma Cloud31 of 404Not in the top three

Microsoft Defender for Cloud30 of 403Not in the top three

Orca Security27 of 403Not in the top three

Aqua Security20 of 401Not in the top three

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security19 of 400Not in the top three

Check Point CloudGuard13 of 400Not in the top three

Sysdig Secure12 of 401Not in the top three

Sysdig12 of 400Not in the top three

Tenable Cloud Security12 of 400Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 39 of the 40 answers that named SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

expertinsights.com30

cyberpress.org26

gbhackers.com25

cybersecuritynews.com23

gartner.com17

peerspot.com17

sentinelone.comYour site17

cloudaware.com16

orca.security14

accuknox.com13

181 of the 198 domain citations in answers naming SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cybersecuritynews.com/best-cnapp-platforms15

cyberpress.org/cnapp-platforms-by-business-size-214

expertinsights.com/application-security/the-top-cloud-native-application-protection-platfo13

cloudaware.com/blog/top-cloud-security-posture-management-vendors12

gbhackers.com/best-cnapp-compared12

peerspot.com/categories/cloud-native-application-protection-platforms-cnapp9

cyberpress.org/cspm-tools-by-business-size-28

expertinsights.com/cloud-security/the-top-cloud-security-posture-management-cspm-solutions8

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security; a claim can dispute any of them.

SentinelOne 5PingSafe 4

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sentinelone.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.