AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › TrueFoundry · October 2026 Edition
3 categories · Ranked

TrueFoundry

40Judge labels
2First choices
4Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in LLM gateways for mid-market buyers
Rank 18 of 69 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 5 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In llm gateways · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named TrueFoundry for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
LLM gateways and observabilityData platform0%18 of 690%5under 10 labels · led by LiteLLM at 31%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
AI governance platformsData platform0%48 of 1350%3under 10 labels · led by Credo AI at 18%
AI security platformsSecurity operations0%69 of 2330%2under 10 labels · led by SentinelOne Singularity at 11%

Movement

Since September 2026, TrueFoundry held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · LLM gateways · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 30 → 48 of 51
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 12 → 17 of 54
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 5 → 8 of 75

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
LLM gateways0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 12 → 18 of 69
AI governance0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 48 of 135, unchanged
AI security0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 69 of 233, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated TrueFoundry across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.503104
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00101
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.2000101
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B01001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labelsNone
Paraphrase4 labels1
Comparative18 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained3 labels1
Scale-constrained6 labelsNone
Negative5 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative40 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“TrueFoundry combines LLM observability and tracing with an AI Gateway and infrastructure-level controls” Claude Haiku 4.5 · LLM gateways · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“TrueFoundry is stronger for LLM inference, AI agents, MCP tools, and VPC-native governance” Claude Haiku 4.5 · AI security · comparative prompt · alternative
“TrueFoundry's Pro tier starts at $499 per month for small teams shipping AI features.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · AI security · budget prompt · alternative
“choose Portkey / Cloudflare / TrueFoundry / Requesty for managed governance” Muse Glimmer 30B · LLM gateways · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as TrueFoundry, over the 40 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and TrueFoundry was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Portkey20 of 407Not among the top eight
Bifrost16 of 405Not among the top eight
LiteLLM15 of 404Not among the top eight
Kong AI Gateway13 of 400Not among the top eight
Credo AI10 of 403Not among the top eight
Cloudflare AI Gateway10 of 400Not among the top eight
OpenRouter9 of 403Not among the top eight
Speakeasy9 of 400Not among the top eight
Fiddler AI8 of 400Not among the top eight
Helicone8 of 400Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named TrueFoundry. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 40 of the 40 answers that named TrueFoundry and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

truefoundry.comYour site20
getmaxim.ai19
dev.to15
braintrust.dev8
respan.ai8
superblocks.com8
openrouter.ai7
secureprivacy.ai7
dupple.com6
speakeasy.com6

Eighty-four of the 104 domain citations in answers naming TrueFoundry came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

truefoundry.com ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, TrueFoundry takes 0% of first choices and LiteLLM takes 31%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “llm gateway”
3
Position for “llm gateways”
3
Searches for its name, Google
1,600 a month (“truefoundry”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
21 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 47,088 a month
Searches its site ranks for
4,390 · 236 in the top three
Sites linking to it
2,384
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
17 ads · 14 text, 3 image · 2 shown in the last 30 days

First shown January 2026, as ENSEMBLE LABS INC, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 17 in the year. 1 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 18 of 69 in LLM gateways
Segment leader
31%
LiteLLM
First choices
2 across its categories
Named in
40 answers
Its own site cited
in 40 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on truefoundry.com
10,032
subdomains included
Content
1,772
counted in the table below
Documentation
918
Product · Integration
50 · 4
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog1,172772026-09-28ML platforms, LLM gateways
Comparison269722026-09-28API gateways, LLM gateways
Glossary or explainer195462026-09-25Vector databases, IaC
Case study43undated
Report or ebook3302025-08-29
News or press2882026-09-11
Webinar or virtual event1212026-07-04
Conference or event12undated
Template or tool642026-08-06
Podcast or video2undated

Most recent

Events in person

Last twelve months

As the event pages on truefoundry.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page truefoundry.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name ML platforms (28); 26 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow TrueFoundry

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

TrueFoundry is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Enterprise AI Gateway & MCP Gateway
For
Enterprises; DS Leaders; IT Leaders; Principal Architects; VP of Platform; Chief AI Officers; CISOs
Price stated
Developer $0; Pro $25 / user / month; Enterprise Custom truefoundry.com/pricing
Starting price
$0 truefoundry.com/pricing
Free plan or trial
Start free; No Credit Card Needed; Get instant access to a live TrueFoundry environment truefoundry.com
Certifications
SOC 2HIPAAGDPRFrost & Sullivan's 2026 Global Transformational Innovation Leader
Hosting
On-premVPChybridpublic cloudair-gappedacross multiple cloudsVPC / On-premAir-gapped deployment
Customers named
NVIDIAResmedAutomation AnywhereSiemens HealthineersInnovaccerGames 24 sevenNetAppAdopt AI
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations

What TrueFoundry's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: truefoundry.com, truefoundry.com/pricing, trust.truefoundry.com, truefoundry.com/solutions/cisos, truefoundry.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when TrueFoundry's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as TrueFoundry, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for TrueFoundry by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where TrueFoundry is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name TrueFoundry, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at truefoundry.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.