AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Speakeasy · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Speakeasy

18Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
7 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Speakeasy was named 7 times in AI governance, where Credo AI led with 18%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business40 of 144
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market27 of 135
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise24 of 131
0%8 labels
under the label threshold
In ai governance · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Speakeasy for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
AI governance platformsData platform0%27 of 1350%7under 10 labels · led by Credo AI at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Speakeasy yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Speakeasy across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500101
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00101
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.2000000
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00303
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative9 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative18 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Speakeasy offering strong policy enforcement and audit trails” Mistral Small · AI governance · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Speakeasy, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Speakeasy was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Credo AI12 of 184Not among the top eight
Fiddler AI11 of 180Not among the top eight
OneTrust AI Governance10 of 180Not among the top eight
IBM watsonx.governance9 of 181Not among the top eight
Holistic AI9 of 180Not among the top eight
TrueFoundry9 of 180Not among the top eight
MintMCP8 of 180Not among the top eight
Runlayer8 of 180Not among the top eight
Microsoft Purview6 of 180Not among the top eight
Bifrost3 of 181Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Speakeasy. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 18 of the 18 answers that named Speakeasy and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

speakeasy.comYour site14
superblocks.com10
secureprivacy.ai8
upguard.com7
firefly.ai6
g2.com6
ovaledge.com6
atlan.com5
securityboulevard.com5
techtarget.com5

Fifty-eight of the seventy-two domain citations in answers naming Speakeasy came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

speakeasy.com/blog/best-ai-governance-platforms-202614
superblocks.com/blog/ai-governance-platform10
secureprivacy.ai/blog/best-ai-governance-platforms-20268
upguard.com/blog/best-ai-governance-platforms7
firefly.ai/academy/ai-governance-platforms6
g2.com/categories/ai-governance-tools6
ovaledge.com/blog/ai-governance-tools6
securityboulevard.com/2026/08/top-ai-governance-platforms-2026-comparison-guide-kovrr5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

speakeasy.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Speakeasy takes 0% of first choices and Credo AI takes 18%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “ai governance platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “ai governance platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
201,000 a month (“speakeasy”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
44,922 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 5,981 a month
Searches its site ranks for
1,798 · 157 in the top three
Sites linking to it
1,789
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
34 ads · 32 text, 2 video · 9 shown in the last 30 days

First shown June 2024, as SPEAKEASY DEVELOPMENT, INC., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 21 in the year, 13 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 27 of 135 in AI governance
Segment leader
18%
Credo AI
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
18 answers
Its own site cited
in 18 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on speakeasy.com
1,297
subdomains included
Content
439
counted in the table below
Documentation
603
Product · Integration
70 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog30862026-09-29AI governance, Observability
Report or ebook68undated
Comparison41112026-09-17
Case study19undated
Webinar or virtual event302024-06-28

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page speakeasy.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Speakeasy

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Speakeasy is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
The AI control plane for the AI-native enterprise.
speakeasy.com
For
Enterprise security, platform, and AI engineering teams
speakeasy.com
Free plan or trial
Start for free speakeasy.com/pricing
Certifications
SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001CSA STAR AI certifiedGDPR compliantHIPAA readySOC 2ISO/IEC 27001:2022SOC 2 Type 2
Customers named
MoonPayFermatMistral AICriblKongLaunchDarklyRedisDocuSign
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, integrations, hosting

What Speakeasy's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: speakeasy.com, speakeasy.com/pricing, trust.speakeasy.com, speakeasy.com/product/docs-mcp, speakeasy.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Speakeasy's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Speakeasy, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Speakeasy by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Speakeasy is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Speakeasy, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at speakeasy.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.