AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Portkey · October 2026 Edition
4 categories · Ranked

Portkey

175Judge labels
47First choices
20Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
4Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
31% in LLM gateways for mid-market buyers
Rank 2 of 69 in the mid-market standingendorsed leader
7 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 11% of its 53 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Portkey →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In llm gateways · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Portkey for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
LLM gateways and observabilityData platform31%2 of 6911%53endorsed leader=heldSince September 2026: 29% → 29%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
AI security platformsSecurity operations0%67 of 2330%2under 10 labels · led by SentinelOne Singularity at 11%
AI governance platformsData platform0%74 of 1350%1under 10 labels · led by Credo AI at 18%
API gatewaysDeveloper platform0%44 of 660%1under 10 labels · led by Kong Gateway at 53%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Portkey held within the floor in all four categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · LLM gateways · by segment

Small business▲+15Since September 2026: 15% → 30%, +15 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
30%from 15% in September 2026
Cleared the floor by 4 pointsRank 2 → 1 of 51
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 29% → 29%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
29%from 29% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 2 of 54, unchanged
Enterprise▲+17Since September 2026: 15% → 32%, +17 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
32%from 15% in September 2026
Cleared the floor by 6 pointsRank 3 → 1 of 75

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
LLM gateways29%29%=heldSince September 2026: 29% → 29%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 2 of 69, unchanged
AI security0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 67 of 233, unchanged
AI governance0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 74 of 135, unchanged
API gateways0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 33 → 44 of 66

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Portkey across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.521003
GPT-5.4 mini03014
Gemini 3.5 Flash23106
Perplexity Sonar20114
Grok 4.2022015
Mistral Small02204
DeepSeek V4 Flash13015
Llama 4 Maverick00314
Qwen 3.7 Flash13105
Kimi K221003
GLM 4.7 FlashX22004
MiniMax M2.510113
GPT-6 Luna20002
Muse Glimmer 30B22105

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct28 labels17
Paraphrase40 labels24
Comparative41 labels8not counted in share
Budget-constrained28 labels1
Scale-constrained16 labels5
Negative22 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative175 labels in all, every segment counted; 47 of the 57 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Go with Portkey if you want an all-in-one platform that's enterprise-ready with strong compliance certifications.” MiniMax M2.5 · LLM gateways · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“If you prefer a managed service so your team can focus strictly on building product features, choose Portkey.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · LLM gateways · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Great all-rounder. Excellent balance between enterprise governance, prompt management, and observability.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · LLM gateways · scale prompt · first choice
“Portkey is often the best starting point. It covers routing, observability, and governance in one place” GLM 4.7 FlashX · LLM gateways · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“avoid Portkey hosted due to CVEs and black-box concerns” DeepSeek V4 Flash · LLM gateways · negative prompt · hard negative
“its paid plans start at $49/month, so it is usually less attractive than LiteLLM or OpenRouter for the tightest budgets” Perplexity Sonar · LLM gateways · budget prompt · soft negative
“Acquired by Palo Alto Networks in May 2026, which introduces some roadmap uncertainty” MiniMax M2.5 · LLM gateways · negative prompt · soft negative
“Portkey is more enterprise-oriented, but usually not the cheapest choice” GPT-5.4 mini · LLM gateways · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Portkey, over the 175 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Portkey was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
LiteLLM142 of 17544Compare →
Kong AI Gateway72 of 1752Not among the top eight
Langfuse24 of 1750Not among the top eight
TrueFoundry20 of 1751Not among the top eight
Braintrust Gateway19 of 1750Not among the top eight
LangSmith14 of 1754Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Portkey. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 167 of the 175 answers that named Portkey and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

getmaxim.ai85
dev.to77
openrouter.ai76
respan.ai62
portkey.aiYour site59
truefoundry.com57
cloudzero.com45
dataiku.com44
braintrust.dev40
llmgateway.io39

525 of the 584 domain citations in answers naming Portkey came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

portkey.ai ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Portkey takes 31% of first choices and LiteLLM takes 31%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “llm gateway”
9
Position for “llm gateways”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
5,400 a month (“portkey”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
131 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 5,999 a month
Searches its site ranks for
2,014 · 76 in the top three
Sites linking to it
2,372
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
5 ads · 5 text · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown February 2025, as Portkey, Inc, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 2 in the year, 3 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
31%
rank 2 of 69 in LLM gateways
Segment leader
31%
LiteLLM
First choices
47 across its categories
Named in
175 answers
Its own site cited
in 167 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on portkey.ai
2,282
subdomains included
Content
138
counted in the table below
Documentation
1,485
Product · Integration
9 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Report or ebook70undated
Blog4522026-09-15LLM gateways
Case study882026-09-15
Glossary or explainer802026-05-04
Comparison542026-09-15
Conference or event1undated
Template or tool102023-07-01

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page portkey.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Portkey

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Portkey; a claim can dispute any of them.
Portkey (OSS gateway) 1Portkey (now Prisma AIRS AI Gateway) 1Portkey (now positioned as the Prisma AIRS AI Gateway) 1Portkey / Kong AI Gateway 1Portkey / Prisma AIRS AI Gateway 1

Follow Portkey

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Portkey is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Production Stack for Gen AI Builders
For
AI teams
Price stated
Free Forever; $49/month; Custom Pricing portkey.ai/pricing
Starting price
$49/month portkey.ai/pricing
Free plan or trial
Get started for free portkey.ai
Certifications
HIPAA COMPLIANTSOC2 Type 2GDPRHIPAAISO27001SOC 2 compliance
Customers named
FiggHaptikQoalaArioInternet2RVO HealthSnorkel AIQA.tech
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations, hosting

What Portkey's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: portkey.ai, portkey.ai/pricing, trust.portkey.ai, portkey.ai/features/mcp. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Portkey's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Portkey, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Portkey by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Portkey is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Portkey, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at portkey.ai is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where Portkey is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHide

Portkey is among the products AI models recommend first in LLM gateways and observability this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Among AI models' top three in LLM gateways and observability, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/it-data/llm-gateways-and-observability/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/portkey--llm-gateways-and-observability-wide.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in LLM gateways and observability, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the LLM gateways and observability standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Among AI models' top three in LLM gateways and observability, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/it-data/llm-gateways-and-observability/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/portkey--llm-gateways-and-observability-square.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in LLM gateways and observability, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the LLM gateways and observability standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Among AI models' top three in LLM gateways and observability, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/it-data/llm-gateways-and-observability/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/portkey--llm-gateways-and-observability-compact.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in LLM gateways and observability, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the LLM gateways and observability standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.