Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 10 → 16 of 62
1 category · Named, not rankedTracecat
8Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Tracecat was named 4 times in SOAR, where Tines led with 41%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business16 of 64
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market16 of 67
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In soar · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Tracecat for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOAR platforms | Security operations | 0% | 16 of 67 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Tines at 41% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Tracecat held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · SOAR · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 8 → 19 of 56
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOAR | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 8 → 16 of 67 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Tracecat across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Tracecat across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained7 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Open-source SOAR platform positioned as an alternative to Tines and Splunk SOAR” Muse Glimmer 30B · SOAR · budget prompt · alternative
“Tracecat: A newer, AI-native open-source SOAR (AGPL-3.0)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · SOAR · budget prompt · alternative
“Best Modern/AI-Native Open Source: Tracecat” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SOAR · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Tracecat, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Tracecat was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Tracecat, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Tracecat was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Tracecat. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 8 answers that named Tracecat and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
tracecat.comYour site8
g2.com5
aimultiple.com4
itechguides.com4
sourceforge.net4
automationatlas.io3
aws.amazon.com3
checkthat.ai3
cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com3
comparitech.com3
Thirty-two of the forty domain citations in answers naming Tracecat came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on tracecat.com
794
subdomains included
Content
120
counted in the table below
Documentation
579
Product · Integration
1 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Template or tool | 109 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 8 | 2 | 2026-09-11 | SOAR | |
| Blog | 3 | 1 | 2026-09-21 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-21Tracecat 1 0 launch blog
- 2026-09-11Open source soar comparison
- 2026-09-02Tines comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page tracecat.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Tracecat
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Tracecat is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Tracecat is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Open source security automation platform for teams and AI agents
- For
- AI-native security teams
- Price stated
- Free forever; Custom tracecat.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Build agents free today tracecat.com
- Integrations claimed
- 500 tracecat.com
- Certifications
- SOC2 Type IISOC 2 Type II
- Hosting
- USEU
- Customers named
- DepopNeo FinancialSaronic
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price
What Tracecat's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: tracecat.com, tracecat.com/pricing, trust.tracecat.com, tracecat.com/security-automation-examples/platform-security. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Tracecat's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Tracecat, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Tracecat by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Tracecat is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Tracecat, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.