IT AI Index
Index Vendors › tenfold · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

tenfold

21Judge labels
4First choices
1Negative labels
8 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
7% in IGA for small business buyers
Rank 24 of 77 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 8 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In iga · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named tenfold for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Identity governanceIdentity and access0%24 of 770%8under 10 labels · led by Lumos at 20%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for tenfold yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated tenfold across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast02002
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash01102
Llama 4 Maverick01102
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct6 labelsNone
Paraphrase5 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labels2
Scale-constrained3 labels2
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative21 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“tenfold - a no-code IGA platform that covers the full user lifecycle and is suitable for mid-market organizations.” Llama 4 Maverick · IGA · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“No-code automation for full user lifecycle... Tailored for mid-market hybrid IT” Grok 4.1 Fast · IGA · direct prompt · alternative
“Best for mid-market organizations wanting no-code governance automation” Mistral Small · IGA · direct prompt · alternative
“Tenfold is noted specifically for filling this mid-market gap” DeepSeek V4 Flash · IGA · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as tenfold, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and tenfold was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
SailPoint14 of 211Not in the top three
Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud12 of 210Not in the top three
Lumos11 of 214Not in the top three
Okta Identity Governance9 of 210Not in the top three
AccessOwl8 of 213Not in the top three
One Identity Manager8 of 210Not in the top three
JumpCloud7 of 211Not in the top three
Microsoft Entra ID Governance7 of 211Not in the top three
Omada Identity7 of 211Not in the top three
Iden7 of 210Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named tenfold. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 21 answers that named tenfold and are not a share of its labels.

Names read as tenfold

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as tenfold; a claim can dispute any of them.
Tenfold 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when tenfold's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as tenfold, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at tenfold-security.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.