Index › Products › Talend Data Quality · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Talend Data Quality

8Judge labels

0First choices

2Negative labels

5 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Talend Data Quality was named 4 times in Data observability, where Metaplane led with 31%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market96 of 110

under the label threshold

Enterprise21 of 101

under the label threshold

In data observability · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Talend Data Quality for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Data quality and observability	Data platform	0%	96 of 110	50%	4	under 10 labels · led by Metaplane at 31%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Talend Data Quality yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Talend Data Quality across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase6 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Consider Talend if you need deeper integration capabilities and have the budget” Kimi K2 · Data observability · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Reserve Talend Data Quality for when you need a broader, enterprise‑grade data quality and governance platform and can justify a higher investment.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Data observability · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

“Enterprise data integration & governance | Custom (high) | Multiple | ⭐⭐ (over‑kill)” MiniMax M2.5 · Data observability · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Talend Data Quality, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Talend Data Quality was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Informatica Data Quality4 of 81Not among the top eight

Ataccama ONE4 of 80Not among the top eight

Great Expectations4 of 80Not among the top eight

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud3 of 81Not among the top eight

Collibra Data Quality & Observability3 of 80Not among the top eight

Microsoft Purview3 of 80Not among the top eight

Cleanlist2 of 82Not among the top eight

Bigeye2 of 80Not among the top eight

DemandTools2 of 80Not among the top eight

Dynatrace2 of 80Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Talend Data Quality. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 8 answers that named Talend Data Quality and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

pipeline.zoominfo.com4

airbyte.com3

ataccama.com3

atlan.com3

cleanlist.ai3

datamation.com3

g2.com3

sourceforge.net3

capterra.co.uk2

cognism.com2

No domain is on file for Talend Data Quality, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

pipeline.zoominfo.com/operations/data-cleansing-software4

airbyte.com/top-etl-tools-for-sources/data-quality-tools3

capterra.co.uk/directory/31126/data-quality/software2

cleanlist.ai/blog/2026-03-27-data-quality-tools2

cleanlist.ai/glossary/data-quality-tools2

cognism.com/blog/data-quality-management-tools2

datamation.com/big-data/data-observability-tools2

em360tech.com/top-10/data-quality-tools2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Talend Data Quality

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Talend Data Quality; a claim can dispute any of them.

Talend Data Quality (Qlik) 1

Follow Talend Data Quality

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Talend Data Quality's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Talend Data Quality, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Talend Data Quality by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Talend Data Quality is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Talend Data Quality, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.