AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Bigeye · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Bigeye

105Judge labels
3First choices
29Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
3% in Data observability for mid-market buyers
Rank 7 of 110 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 23% of its 35 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Bigeye →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In data observability · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Bigeye for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Data quality and observabilityData platform3%7 of 11023%35accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Bigeye yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Bigeye across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.502002
GPT-5.4 mini11002
Gemini 3.5 Flash00011
Perplexity Sonar01113
Grok 4.1 Fast00213
Mistral Small00112
DeepSeek V4 Flash02103
Llama 4 Maverick01102
Qwen 3.7 Flash00112
Kimi K202215
GLM 4.7 FlashX02002
MiniMax M2.502002
GPT-6 Luna00101
Muse Glimmer 30B21025

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct25 labels1
Paraphrase4 labelsNone
Comparative23 labels4not counted in share
Budget-constrained13 labelsNone
Scale-constrained19 labels2
Negative21 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative105 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Bigeye is positioned as the Enterprise AI Trust Platform combining data observability, end-to-end lineage and agentic AI governance. It is recommended for large enterprises 500+ employees” Muse Glimmer 30B · Data observability · scale prompt · first choice
“Bigeye is the platform most guides explicitly call out for mid-market ease of use and quick implementation” Muse Glimmer 30B · Data observability · direct prompt · first choice
“If you want production observability with automated anomaly detection: Monte Carlo or Bigeye” GPT-5.4 mini · Data observability · comparative prompt · first choice
“Enterprise AI trust and data observability platform for improving data quality, lineage visibility, sensitivity discovery, governance, and AI policy enforcement.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Data observability · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Why be cautious: integration gaps for non-standard stacks, workspace management overhead, and enterprise-only quote pricing.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Data observability · negative prompt · soft negative
“users note tuning needs; consolidation (e.g., via acquisitions like Datadog/Metaplane) may disrupt roadmaps” Grok 4.1 Fast · Data observability · negative prompt · soft negative
“Monte Carlo, Anomalo, Bigeye: While popular, these ML-based platforms are best for specific use cases” Mistral Small · Data observability · negative prompt · soft negative
“contrasted with usage-based enterprise pricing like Monte Carlo / Bigeye at $25K–$100K+/year” Muse Glimmer 30B · Data observability · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Bigeye, over the 105 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Bigeye was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Soda60 of 1058Compare →
Anomalo50 of 1051Not among the top eight
Acceldata41 of 1055Not among the top eight
Datadog23 of 1050Not among the top eight
Collibra Data Quality & Observability22 of 1051Not among the top eight
Ataccama ONE19 of 1052Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Bigeye. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 99 of the 105 answers that named Bigeye and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

atlan.com63
datamation.com44
g2.com44
learn.g2.com41
guideflow.com33
ir.com31
gartner.com29
research.isg-one.com29
basedash.com26
acceldata.io24

364 of the 364 domain citations in answers naming Bigeye came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

bigeye.com ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Bigeye takes 3% of first choices and Metaplane takes 31%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “data observability platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best data observability platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
33,100 a month (“bigeye”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
618 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 9,473 a month
Searches its site ranks for
674 · 31 in the top three
Sites linking to it
3,197
Paid Google search
3 searches its ads show for, about 2,358 clicks and $18,069 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
31 ads · 30 text, 1 image · 4 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2021, as Toro Data Labs, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 7 in the year, 24 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
3%
rank 7 of 110 in data observability
Segment leader
31%
Metaplane
First choices
3 across its categories
Named in
105 answers
Its own site cited
in 99 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on bigeye.com
1,159
subdomains included
Content
540
counted in the table below
Documentation
491
Product · Integration
26 · 1
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog25902026-03-24Observability, ETL
Glossary or explainer190undatedETL, Data catalogs
Webinar or virtual event3422026-10-01
Conference or event2812026-09-23
Comparison15undatedETL, Observability
Case study1102026-01-27
News or press2undated
Podcast or video1undated

Most recent

Events in person

Last twelve months

As the event pages on bigeye.com state them, read October 5, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page bigeye.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Bigeye

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Bigeye; a claim can dispute any of them.
Bigeye / Bigeye AI Trust Platform 1Bigeye/Fivetran 1

Follow Bigeye

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Bigeye is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Bigeye is the data and AI trust platform for large enterprises.
For
large enterprises
Certifications
EU AI ActISO 42001SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001:2022ISO/IEC 27001 certificationSOC 2ISO 27001
Hosting
AWS
Customers named
NOVFreedom MortgageZoomUdacityJustAnswerSimpleRoseImpiraCrux
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations

What Bigeye's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: bigeye.com, trust.bigeye.com, bigeye.com/platform/security, bigeye.com/customer-stories, bigeye.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Bigeye's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Bigeye, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Bigeye by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Bigeye is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Bigeye, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at bigeye.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.