Every category where a model named Ataccama ONE for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Master data management	Data platform	2%	7 of 92	8%	25	accepted challenger
Data quality and observability	Data platform	0%	64 of 110	33%	9	under 10 labels · led by Metaplane at 31%
Data catalogs and governance	Data platform	0%	13 of 83	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Atlan at 44%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Ataccama ONE yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Ataccama ONE across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	3	0	0	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	2	2	0	4
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	2	2	4
Mistral Small	0	1	1	1	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	3	1	6
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	4	0	5
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	4	0	1	5
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	2	0	0	2
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	2	0	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct7 labelsNone

Paraphrase20 labels3

Comparative42 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained7 labelsNone

Scale-constrained9 labels1

Negative20 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative105 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you want enterprise power but manageable scale → Informatica or Ataccama” MiniMax M2.5 · Master data · scale prompt · first choice

“Other options include Ataccama and data.world, which offer integrated data quality or knowledge-graph approaches without enterprise-tier costs.” Llama 4 Maverick · Data catalogs · budget prompt · alternative

“Ataccama: best if you want a broader AI-powered data management platform across cloud and hybrid environments.” Perplexity Sonar · Master data · direct prompt · alternative

“A unified platform that combines data quality, data profiling, and MDM. Excellent if your data is highly chaotic” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Master data · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid enterprise tools like Reltio/Ataccama unless budget allows” Grok 4.1 Fast · Master data · budget prompt · hard negative

“Ataccama | $90,000–$100,000+/year, heavy enterprise focus” Kimi K2 · Data observability · paraphrase prompt · hard negative

“suitable for upper mid-market to enterprise needs, but may be more complex or costly for smaller mid-market firms” Mistral Small · Master data · direct prompt · soft negative

“Gartner-noted UI/lineage mismatches (extra licensing); better for governance than pure observability.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Data observability · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Ataccama ONE, over the 105 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Ataccama ONE was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Semarchy xDM47 of 1056Compare →

Profisee MDM46 of 10515Compare →

Informatica MDM45 of 10511Compare →

Reltio37 of 1053Compare →

Stibo Systems STEP32 of 1051Not among the top eight

SAP Master Data Governance32 of 1050Not among the top eight

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud28 of 1058Not among the top eight

Monte Carlo25 of 10510Not among the top eight

Collibra Data Quality & Observability22 of 1050Not among the top eight

Great Expectations21 of 1052Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Ataccama ONE. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 103 of the 105 answers that named Ataccama ONE and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

ovaledge.com46

gartner.com38

atlan.com34

g2.com34

semarchy.com30

atrocore.com28

ciopages.com27

fanruan.com24

informatica.com24

ataccama.comYour site23

285 of the 308 domain citations in answers naming Ataccama ONE came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

semarchy.com/blog/top-master-data-management-solutions-compared28

atrocore.com/en/blog/best-master-data-management-tools23

ovaledge.com/blog/master-data-management-tools23

ciopages.com/buyer-guides/master-data-management20

guideflow.com/blog/master-data-management-software17

larksuite.com/en_us/blog/tools-for-master-data-management17

profisee.com/30-best-master-data-management-tools17

geopostcodes.com/blog/comparison-master-data-management-tools16

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

ataccama.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Ataccama ONE takes 2% of first choices and Profisee MDM takes 41%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “master data management platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “master data management platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 90 a month (“ataccama one”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 2,552 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 979 · 47 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 2,380
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

41 ads · 38 text, 2 video, 1 image · 14 shown in the last 30 days

First shown May 2024, as Ataccama Corp., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 16 in the year, 25 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 7 of 92 in master data

Segment leader

41%

Profisee MDM

First choices: 4 across its categories
Named in: 105 answers
Its own site cited: in 103 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on ataccama.com

10,656

subdomains included

Content

1,141

counted in the table below

Documentation

9,284

Product · Integration

23 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest
Glossary or explainer	456	2	2026-07-28
Blog	162	14	2026-09-28
Webinar or virtual event	155	2	2026-09-16
Conference or event	121	12	2026-10-15
Report or ebook	101	6	2026-09-15
News or press	95	4	2026-09-09
Case study	33	3	2026-09-18
Comparison	12	1	2026-07-14
Template or tool	5	0	2026-06-01
Podcast or video	1	0	2025-12-10

Most recent

2026-10-15Snowflake world tour new york conference or event
2026-10-15Gartner uk cdao community executive summit conference or event
2026-10-15The winners circle conference or event
2026-10-14Data innovation summit mea 2026 conference or event
2026-10-13Trust driven medallion architecture conference or event
2026-09-28Data enrichment blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page ataccama.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Ataccama ONE

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Ataccama ONE; a claim can dispute any of them.

Ataccama 21Ataccama (Ataccama ONE) 1Ataccama (ONE) 1Ataccama ONE Platform 1Ataccama One 1

Follow Ataccama ONE

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Ataccama ONE is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: A unified data trust platform that combines data quality, data observability, master data management, and data governance into a single AI-powered solution.
ataccama.com
For: enterprises
ataccama.com
Free plan or trial: custom demo; guided evaluation ataccama.com/pricing
Customers named: T-MobileLloyds Banking GroupPrudentialBlue Cross Blue ShieldFifth Third BankJudo BankSSEN TransmissionMarti Group
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Ataccama ONE's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: ataccama.com, ataccama.com/pricing, ataccama.com/platform, ataccama.com/customers, ataccama.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Ataccama ONE's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Ataccama ONE, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Ataccama ONE by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Ataccama ONE is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Ataccama ONE, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.