| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data quality and observability | Data platform | 9% | 3 of 110 | 0% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Metaplane at 31% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Cleanlist - offers enrichment and cleansing capabilities, with a 14-day trial and a free plan or $79/month. It integrates with HubSpot, Salesforce, and API, making it a good option for SMB/mid-market teams.” Llama 4 Maverick · Data observability · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For most mid-sized B2B companies, Cleanlist or Insycle are excellent starting points” Mistral Small · Data observability · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Most mid‑sized B2B companies will get the best bang for their buck with Cleanlist” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Data observability · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Start with Insycle or Cleanlist. The ROI is immediate” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Data observability · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 12 answers that named Cleanlist and are not a share of its labels.
Fifty-one of the sixty-three domain citations in answers naming Cleanlist came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 176 | 67 | 2026-09-22 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 83 | 0 | 2026-06-30 | ||
| Comparison | 46 | 11 | 2026-09-07 | ||
| Template or tool | 41 | 18 | 2026-07-17 | ||
| Report or ebook | 14 | undated | |||
| Case study | 3 | 0 | 2026-03-15 |
Every page cleanlist.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Cleanlist's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: cleanlist.ai, cleanlist.ai/pricing, cleanlist.ai/product/api, cleanlist.ai/customers, cleanlist.ai/resources/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Cleanlist's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Cleanlist, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Cleanlist by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
Cleanlist is among the products AI models recommend first in Data quality and observability this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.