IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › StackStorm · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

StackStorm

8Judge labels

0First choices

2Negative labels

4 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. StackStorm was named 3 times in SOAR, where Tines led with 47%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business19 of 55

under the label threshold

Mid-market27 of 49

under the label threshold

Enterprise47 of 48

under the label threshold

In soar · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named StackStorm for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
SOAR platforms	Security operations	0%	27 of 49	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Tines at 47%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for StackStorm yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated StackStorm across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained5 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as StackStorm, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and StackStorm was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Shuffle8 of 83Not in the top three

Tines6 of 83Not in the top three

Cortex XSOAR3 of 81Not in the top three

Torq3 of 81Not in the top three

Tracecat3 of 81Not in the top three

Splunk SOAR3 of 80Not in the top three

TheHive with Cortex3 of 80Not in the top three

n8n3 of 80Not in the top three

FortiSOAR2 of 80Not in the top three

Rapid7 InsightConnect2 of 80Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named StackStorm. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 8 answers that named StackStorm and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

aimultiple.com5

cybersec-automation.com4

paloaltonetworks.com4

blinkops.com3

cloudsek.com3

comparitech.com3

exabeam.com3

gartner.com3

strike48.com3

tracecat.com3

Thirty-four of the thirty-four domain citations in answers naming StackStorm came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

aimultiple.com/open-source-soar5

aimultiple.com/top-soar-platforms4

cybersec-automation.com/p/opensource-soar-uncovered4

paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/soar-tools-comparison4

cloudsek.com/knowledge-base/best-soar-platforms3

comparitech.com/net-admin/best-soar-software3

gartner.com/reviews/market/security-orchestration-automation-and-response-solutions3

tracecat.com/alternatives/open-source-soar3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as StackStorm

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as StackStorm; a claim can dispute any of them.

Stackstorm 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when StackStorm's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as StackStorm, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at stack.watch is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.