42Crunch vs StackHawk
Zero of fourteen models named 42Crunch first on the direct prompt; zero named StackHawk. 42Crunch was named by twelve of the fourteen models and StackHawk by twelve and 42Crunch carries 31 labels and StackHawk 19, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the API security platforms page.
By framing
42CrunchFirst choices, of fourteen modelsStackHawk
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, 42Crunch and StackHawk were named in the same answer twenty-five times, of the 86 answers naming 42Crunch and the 147 naming StackHawk. In those answers StackHawk took the first choice two times and 42Crunch five.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | ||||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | |||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | | ||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
42Crunch StackHawk first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, 42Crunch on the left and StackHawk on the right.The direct prompt
Neither was the first choice, one was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
10 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
42Crunch12%#1 of 14StackHawk11%#2 of 14What the models said about 42Crunch
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“42Crunch reviewers specifically call out that inaccurate contracts reduce effectiveness, and that deployment/orchestration can add overhead.” GPT-5.4 mini · negative prompt · soft negative
“Pricing is the most accessible among dedicated platforms: a free tier for individual developers, a single user plan starting at $7.50 per month” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Best overall budget-conscious choice: 42Crunch if you want to start smaller and keep costs more predictable.” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · first choice
“42Crunch: Often recommended for its affordability and robust API security features.” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about StackHawk
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“If you outgrow them, scale to affordable paid like StackHawk.” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · soft negative
“Best Overall Value (Automated Testing): StackHawk ... widely considered the best balance of cost and capability for startups and SMBs” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“StackHawk - a developer-centric CI/CD DAST on a budget, with a free tier and paid plans starting at $59/mo.” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.