One of fourteen models named Anomali ThreatStream first on the direct prompt; two named SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence. Anomali ThreatStream was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence by eight and Anomali ThreatStream carries 40 labels and SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence 15, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the threat intelligence platforms page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Anomali ThreatStream and SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence were named in the same answer seventeen times, of the 110 answers naming Anomali ThreatStream and the 78 naming SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence. In those answers SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence took the first choice six times and Anomali ThreatStream zero.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Verdict: Avoid unless you are a large enterprise with specific requirements for high-volume, automated ingestion” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise tools like ThreatQuotient or Anomali ($10K+ annually).” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · hard negative
“Anomali is flagged as enterprise-heavy and may not be the best fit” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Evaluate Anomali or ThreatConnect's mid-market tiers, or your existing security vendor's intel add-ons.” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · first choice
“Recorded Future (feed) + EclecticIQ Fusion (free) or Anomali (SaaS)” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I would recommend Anomali or Cyware as the platform” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.
“positioned for larger teams or come with custom pricing, so they are usually not the best first pick when budget is constrained” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · soft negative
“SOCRadar and similar platforms have user reports of "volume of false positives" requiring extensive manual tuning” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“prioritize platforms that offer Extended Threat Intelligence (XTI) or Brand/Identity protection (like SOCRadar, Flare, or Cyble)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Choose SOCRadar. It offers the most comprehensive, direct threat-intel suite tailored for mid-market budgets.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.