Every category where a model named Cyble Vision for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Threat intelligence platforms	Security operations	6%	6 of 128	0%	12	accepted challenger
Attack surface management	Security operations	0%	92 of 104	50%	2	under 10 labels · led by Intruder at 59%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Cyble Vision yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Cyble Vision across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	2	1	0	0	3
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	1	0	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1	1	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct9 labels2

Paraphrase5 labels1

Comparative10 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative26 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Cyble Vision is the strongest choice for organizations that need dark web monitoring integrated with attack surface and brand intelligence” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Threat intel · direct prompt · first choice

“the best overall threat intelligence platform is usually SOCRadar or Cyble Vision” Perplexity Sonar · Threat intel · direct prompt · first choice

“Cyble Vision (Best Overall for Mid-Market)” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Threat intel · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Cyble processes more than 2 petabytes of data daily and tracks activity across 35,000+ cybercrime sources” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Threat intel · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Usually overkill on price and complexity for a mid-sized firm” DeepSeek V4 Flash · ASM · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Cyble Vision, over the 26 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Cyble Vision was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Recorded Future19 of 2613Not in the top three

ThreatConnect13 of 260Not in the top three

CrowdStrike Falcon Adversary Intelligence10 of 262Not in the top three

Anomali ThreatStream10 of 260Not in the top three

Flashpoint8 of 260Not in the top three

Google Threat Intelligence6 of 261Not in the top three

Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence6 of 260Not in the top three

SOCRadar5 of 261Not in the top three

CloudSEK5 of 260Not in the top three

NordStellar4 of 263Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Cyble Vision. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 26 of the 26 answers that named Cyble Vision and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

analyticsinsight.net21

cyble.comYour site17

cyware.com17

upguard.com15

esecurityplanet.com13

stellarcyber.ai13

learn.g2.com12

b2breviews.com10

expertinsights.com10

shadowdragon.io10

121 of the 138 domain citations in answers naming Cyble Vision came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cyble.com/knowledge-hub/top-best-threat-intelligence-platforms17

analyticsinsight.net/cybersecurity/best-threat-intelligence-platforms16

cyware.com/blog/top-threat-intelligence-platforms-and-solutions16

analyticsinsight.net/cybersecurity/10-best-threat-intelligence-platforms-in-202614

upguard.com/blog/best-threat-intelligence-platforms-and-vendors14

esecurityplanet.com/products/threat-intelligence-platforms13

learn.g2.com/best-threat-intelligence-tools12

stellarcyber.ai/learn/top-threat-intelligence-platforms11

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Cyble Vision's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Cyble Vision, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at cyble.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.