Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 30 of 114, unchanged
2 categories · RankedCyble Vision
42Judge labels
7First choices
5Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
5% in Threat intel for mid-market buyers
Rank 7 of 119 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
2 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 15% of its 13 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Cyble Vision →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business35 of 126
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market7 of 119
5%13 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise6 of 83
2%7 labels
under the label threshold
In threat intel · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Cyble Vision for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Threat intelligence platforms | Security operations | 5% | 7 of 119 | 15% | 13 | accepted challenger | ▼−1Since September 2026: 6% → 6%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Digital risk protection | Security operations | 2% | 15 of 86 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by UpGuard BreachSight at 22% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Cyble Vision held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Threat intel · by segment
Mid-market▼−1Since September 2026: 6% → 6%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
6%from 6% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 7 of 111, unchanged
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 17 → 6 of 78
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DRP | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 15 of 86, unchanged |
| Threat intel | 6% | 6% | ▼−1Since September 2026: 6% → 6%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 7 of 119, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Cyble Vision across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Cyble Vision across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct11 labels3
Paraphrase7 labels2
Comparative8 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained7 labels1
Scale-constrained4 labels1
Negative5 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative42 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Cyble Vision combines threat intelligence, dark web monitoring, brand protection, and automated takedowns, with breadth of coverage at a generally more accessible price point” Claude Haiku 4.5 · DRP · direct prompt · first choice
“Cyble Vision ranks first for combining external threat intelligence, dark web monitoring, attack surface management, and brand protection into a single AI-native platform.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Threat intel · comparative prompt · first choice
“prioritize platforms that offer Extended Threat Intelligence (XTI) or Brand/Identity protection (like SOCRadar, Flare, or Cyble)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Threat intel · scale prompt · first choice
“Rapid7 Threat Command and Cyble Vision are the strongest overall picks” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Threat intel · direct prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Cyble received criticism for: Duplicate notifications and unreliable alert delivery → alert fatigue, Poor customer support” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Threat intel · negative prompt · soft negative
“positioned for larger teams or come with custom pricing, so they are usually not the best first pick when budget is constrained” Perplexity Sonar · Threat intel · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Cyble Vision, over the 42 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Cyble Vision was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Cyble Vision, over the 42 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Cyble Vision was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Cyble Vision. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 42 of the 42 answers that named Cyble Vision and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
upguard.com30
cyble.comYour site26
analyticsinsight.net20
learn.g2.com18
g2.com15
flare.io14
expertinsights.com13
bitsight.com12
cyware.com12
cyberpress.org11
145 of the 171 domain citations in answers naming Cyble Vision came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
cyble.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Cyble Vision takes 5% of first choices and MISP takes 12%.ShowHide
Search and answers
cyble.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Cyble Vision takes 5% of first choices and MISP takes 12%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “threat intelligence platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “threat intelligence platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 30 a month (“cyble vision”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 1 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 20,856 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 9,229 · 37 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 6,687
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
5%
rank 7 of 119 in threat intel
Segment leader
12%
MISP
- First choices
- 7 across its categories
- Named in
- 42 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 42 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on cyble.com
2,284
subdomains included
Content
1,739
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
37 · 2
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,438 | undated | ASM, MFA | ||
| News or press | 106 | undated | Threat intel, ASM | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 78 | undated | ASM, EDR | ||
| Conference or event | 37 | undated | |||
| Case study | 31 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 19 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 18 | undated | EDR | ||
| Podcast or video | 8 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 4 | undated |
Events in person
Last twelve months
- October 13, 2026 to October 15, 2026Meet Cyble at GovWare 2026Sands Expo, Singapore · exhibited
- September 10, 2026 to September 13, 2026Meet Cyble at ET CISO Annual Conclave 2026Grand Hyatt, Goa · sponsored
- March 17, 2026 to March 18, 2026Meet Cyble at the National Cyber Security Summit 2026Tākina, Wellington · sponsored
As the event pages on cyble.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page cyble.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Cyble Vision
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Cyble Vision; a claim can dispute any of them.
Cyble 8Cyble (Cyble Vision) 1
Follow Cyble Vision
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Cyble Vision is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Cyble Vision is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Cyble Vision is an award-winning threat intelligence platform delivering real-time cyber threat detection and response for enterprises.
- For
- enterprises
- Free plan or trial
- 14 days, analyst-guided cyble.com/platforms
- Certifications
- ISO/IEC 27001SOC 2 Type I & IIGDPR AlignedGDPRSOC 2 Type 2ISO/IEC 27001:2022SOC 2 Type II
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, integrations, hosting, customers
What Cyble Vision's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: cyble.com, trust.cyble.com, cyble.com/platforms, cyble.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Cyble Vision's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Cyble Vision, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Cyble Vision by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Cyble Vision is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Cyble Vision, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.