AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Mandiant Threat Intelligence · October 2026 Edition
Mandiant · 1 category · Ranked

Mandiant Threat Intelligence

54Judge labels
1First choices
24Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Threat intel for small business buyers
Rank 118 of 119 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 47% of its 17 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Mandiant Threat Intelligence →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business25 of 126
2%13 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market118 of 119
0%17 labels
criticized challenger
Enterprise17 of 83
0%24 labels
criticized challenger
In threat intel · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Mandiant Threat Intelligence for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Threat intelligence platformsSecurity operations0%118 of 11947%17criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Mandiant Threat Intelligence held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Threat intel · by segment

Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 108 → 19 of 114
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 111 of 111, unchanged
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 10 → 16 of 78

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Threat intel0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 111 → 118 of 119

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Mandiant Threat Intelligence across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00022
Perplexity Sonar00011
Grok 4.2000123
Mistral Small00011
DeepSeek V4 Flash01012
Llama 4 Maverick00011
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K210001
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.501203
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct7 labelsNone
Paraphrase8 labelsNone
Comparative10 labels3not counted in share
Budget-constrained4 labelsNone
Scale-constrained8 labels1
Negative17 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative54 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For Large Enterprises: Mandiant or Recorded Future for comprehensive coverage” Kimi K2 · Threat intel · comparative prompt · first choice
“stick with platforms that produce original research and finished intelligence (Recorded Future, Mandiant, CrowdStrike's intel team, Flashpoint, Intel 471)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Threat intel · negative prompt · alternative
“offers small and medium-sized business-friendly pricing with mid-market pricing” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Threat intel · direct prompt · alternative
“Deep adversary profiling & forensic analysis | Mandiant (FireEye)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Threat intel · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“cited as a platform to be cautious about because of high pricing, ecosystem lock-in, and limited continuous external monitoring” Perplexity Sonar · Threat intel · negative prompt · hard negative
“Exceptionally expensive and best suited for teams with dedicated CTI analysts” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Threat intel · direct prompt · hard negative
“Some analyses suggest avoiding it unless you are a large enterprise” Mistral Small · Threat intel · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid pure enterprise (e.g., Mandiant >$500K)” Grok 4.20 · Threat intel · direct prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Mandiant Threat Intelligence, over the 54 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mandiant Threat Intelligence was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud52 of 5411Not among the top eight
Anomali ThreatStream37 of 542Not among the top eight
ThreatConnect36 of 543Not among the top eight
MISP23 of 541Not among the top eight
OpenCTI23 of 541Not among the top eight
Flashpoint Ignite17 of 541Not among the top eight
CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence16 of 542Not among the top eight
SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence12 of 546Not among the top eight
Cyble Vision9 of 542Not among the top eight
AlienVault OTX8 of 540Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Mandiant Threat Intelligence. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 52 of the 54 answers that named Mandiant Threat Intelligence and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

upguard.com31
analyticsinsight.net26
it-ai-index.com22
vectra.ai22
underdefense.com19
learn.g2.com18
bitsight.com15
csoonline.com15
flare.io15
ciopages.com14

197 of the 197 domain citations in answers naming Mandiant Threat Intelligence came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

upguard.com/blog/best-threat-intelligence-platforms-and-vendors31
analyticsinsight.net/cybersecurity/10-best-threat-intelligence-platforms-in-202622
vectra.ai/topics/threat-intelligence-tools22
learn.g2.com/best-threat-intelligence-tools18
underdefense.com/blog/threat-detection-tools17
csoonline.com/article/3984720/threat-intelligence-platform-buyers-guide-how-to-pick-the-be15
ciopages.com/buyer-guides/threat-intelligence-platform14
it-ai-index.com/security/threat-intelligence-platforms/enterprise14

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

mandiant.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Mandiant Threat Intelligence takes 0% of first choices and MISP takes 12%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “threat intelligence platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “threat intelligence platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
260 a month (“mandiant threat intelligence”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
1 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 225 a month
Searches its site ranks for
82 · 14 in the top three
Sites linking to it
12,980
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 118 of 119 in threat intel
Segment leader
12%
MISP
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
54 answers
Its own site cited
in 52 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on mandiant.com
7
subdomains included
Content
1
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Conference or event1undated

Events in person

Last twelve months

As the event pages on mandiant.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page mandiant.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Mandiant Threat Intelligence

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Mandiant Threat Intelligence; a claim can dispute any of them.
Mandiant 4Mandiant (Google Threat Intelligence) 4Mandiant (Google) 2Mandiant (FireEye) 1Mandiant / Google Threat Intelligence 1Mandiant Advantage 1

Follow Mandiant Threat Intelligence

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Mandiant is the company behind Mandiant Threat Intelligence.
ShowHide

On record

Company records

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Turn threat intelligence into confident decisions
mandiant.com
For
organizations
mandiant.com
Customers named
University of California, RiversideDunelmLloyds Banking Group
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Mandiant Threat Intelligence's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: mandiant.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Mandiant Threat Intelligence's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Mandiant Threat Intelligence, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Mandiant Threat Intelligence by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Mandiant Threat Intelligence is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Mandiant Threat Intelligence, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at mandiant.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.