Every category where a model named MISP for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Threat intelligence platforms	Security operations	11%	2 of 128	8%	24	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for MISP yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated MISP across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	1	1	0	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	3	1	1	5
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	3	0	0	3
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	1	1	4
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1	0	2
Kimi K2	2	2	0	0	4
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	1	0	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labelsNone

Paraphrase12 labels2

Comparative15 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained18 labels10

Scale-constrained4 labels1

Negative13 labels2not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative67 labels in all, every segment counted; 13 of the 17 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For a budget‑constrained company that can dedicate a small server, MISP + TheHive (or OpenCTI) gives you enterprise‑grade intel sharing and investigation without any licensing cost.” MiniMax M2.5 · Threat intel · budget prompt · first choice

“start with OpenCTI Community Edition (for analysis and knowledge management) paired with MISP (for IOC sharing and operational intel)” Kimi K2 · Threat intel · budget prompt · first choice

“MISP offers enterprise-grade threat intelligence management at zero licensing cost and is an excellent starting point” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Threat intel · budget prompt · first choice

“MISP – a free, open-source Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) to collect, organize, and share IoCs” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Threat intel · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid open-source TIPs if your security team consists of "generalists"” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Threat intel · negative prompt · soft negative

“Avoid Open-Source TIPs if you lack dedicated engineering support” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Threat intel · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as MISP, over the 67 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MISP was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Recorded Future42 of 678Not in the top three

OpenCTI38 of 673Not in the top three

ThreatConnect30 of 672Not in the top three

AlienVault OTX27 of 674Not in the top three

Abuse.ch22 of 671Not in the top three

GreyNoise19 of 671Not in the top three

Anomali16 of 671Not in the top three

VirusTotal16 of 671Not in the top three

Anomali ThreatStream15 of 670Not in the top three

NordStellar14 of 674Compare →

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named MISP. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 52 of the 67 answers that named MISP and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

upguard.com33

b2breviews.com29

learn.g2.com27

esecurityplanet.com26

analyticsinsight.net23

cyware.com20

vectra.ai20

sourceforge.net19

g2.com14

spotsaas.com14

225 of the 225 domain citations in answers naming MISP came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

upguard.com/blog/best-threat-intelligence-platforms-and-vendors32

b2breviews.com/threat-intelligence-platforms29

learn.g2.com/best-threat-intelligence-tools27

esecurityplanet.com/products/threat-intelligence-platforms23

vectra.ai/topics/threat-intelligence-tools20

sourceforge.net/software/threat-intelligence/for-small-business15

analyticsinsight.net/cybersecurity/10-best-threat-intelligence-platforms-in-202614

spotsaas.com/list/threat-intelligence-software/for-small-business14

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as MISP

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as MISP; a claim can dispute any of them.

MISP (Malware Information Sharing Platform) 6MISP (Open Source) 2

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when MISP's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as MISP, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at misp-project.org is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.